The effect of general anesthesia applied during cesarean section on newborn bilirubin

Deniz Turan, A. Karayel
{"title":"The effect of general anesthesia applied during cesarean section on newborn bilirubin","authors":"Deniz Turan, A. Karayel","doi":"10.51271/kmj-0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Today, delivery is often performed as normal spontaneous vaginal delivery (NSVD) and cesarean section operations. Deliveries with NSVD mostly take place in the delivery room without the need for additional anesthetic agents. General anesthesia and regional anesthesia techniques are applied in cesarean section operations. In this study; The aim of this study was to examine the effect of general anesthesia on newborn bilirubin and to compare it with the bilirubin level of babies born without general anesthesia with NSVD method.\nMethods: Between March 2022 and September 2022, 152 patients over the age of 18 with term pregnancy NSVD and elective cesarean section without complications were randomly included in the study. Cases diagnosed with liver and biliary tract disease, systemic liver and biliary tract effective drug use, DCOOMBS( +) and Covid (+) clinics were excluded.\nResults: Of the patients included in our study, 75 (49.3%) were given general anesthesia and 77 (50.7%) delivered with NSVD without general anesthesia. It was determined that the first hour bilirubin and the fourth hour bilirubin values were significantly higher (p <0.05) in the general anesthesia group compared to the group that did not receive general anesthesia. In the group that did not receive general anesthesia, the APGAR 5th min score was found to be significantly (p <0.05) higher than the general anesthesia group. APGAR 1 min value did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) between the anesthesia-free and general anesthesia groups. Neonatal weight, head circumference, and infant height did not differ significantly between the groups that did not receive general anesthesia and those who did not receive general anesthesia (p> 0.05). \nConclusion: Among the groups that did not receive general anesthesia and anesthesia; Bilirubin value was found to be higher among babies born by cesarean section under general anesthesia. It seems that it is more beneficial to avoid systemic effects as much as possible and to disseminate NSVD.","PeriodicalId":369732,"journal":{"name":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","volume":"24 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51271/kmj-0124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Today, delivery is often performed as normal spontaneous vaginal delivery (NSVD) and cesarean section operations. Deliveries with NSVD mostly take place in the delivery room without the need for additional anesthetic agents. General anesthesia and regional anesthesia techniques are applied in cesarean section operations. In this study; The aim of this study was to examine the effect of general anesthesia on newborn bilirubin and to compare it with the bilirubin level of babies born without general anesthesia with NSVD method. Methods: Between March 2022 and September 2022, 152 patients over the age of 18 with term pregnancy NSVD and elective cesarean section without complications were randomly included in the study. Cases diagnosed with liver and biliary tract disease, systemic liver and biliary tract effective drug use, DCOOMBS( +) and Covid (+) clinics were excluded. Results: Of the patients included in our study, 75 (49.3%) were given general anesthesia and 77 (50.7%) delivered with NSVD without general anesthesia. It was determined that the first hour bilirubin and the fourth hour bilirubin values were significantly higher (p <0.05) in the general anesthesia group compared to the group that did not receive general anesthesia. In the group that did not receive general anesthesia, the APGAR 5th min score was found to be significantly (p <0.05) higher than the general anesthesia group. APGAR 1 min value did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) between the anesthesia-free and general anesthesia groups. Neonatal weight, head circumference, and infant height did not differ significantly between the groups that did not receive general anesthesia and those who did not receive general anesthesia (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Among the groups that did not receive general anesthesia and anesthesia; Bilirubin value was found to be higher among babies born by cesarean section under general anesthesia. It seems that it is more beneficial to avoid systemic effects as much as possible and to disseminate NSVD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖腹产时全身麻醉对新生儿胆红素的影响
目的:如今,分娩通常分为正常自然阴道分娩(NSVD)和剖腹产手术。正常自然阴道分娩大多在产房进行,不需要额外的麻醉剂。剖腹产手术则采用全身麻醉和区域麻醉技术。本研究旨在探讨全身麻醉对新生儿胆红素的影响,并将其与未使用全身麻醉的 NSVD 法新生儿的胆红素水平进行比较:2022年3月至2022年9月期间,随机纳入152例18岁以上足月妊娠NSVD和无并发症的择期剖宫产患者。排除确诊为肝胆道疾病、全身肝胆道有效药物使用、DCOOMBS(+)和Covid(+)门诊的病例:在纳入研究的患者中,75 例(49.3%)进行了全身麻醉,77 例(50.7%)在未进行全身麻醉的情况下进行了 NSVD 分娩。经测定,无麻醉组和全身麻醉组的第一小时胆红素值和第四小时胆红素值明显更高(P 0.05)。新生儿体重、头围和身高在未接受全身麻醉组和未接受全身麻醉组之间没有明显差异(P> 0.05)。结论在未接受全身麻醉组和麻醉组中,发现在全身麻醉下剖宫产的婴儿胆红素值较高。由此看来,尽可能避免全身影响和传播 NSVD 更为有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health follow-up visits of children with autism How much did the February 6 earthquakes affect a distant hospital? The effect of general anesthesia applied during cesarean section on newborn bilirubin Ultrasound-guided neuromonitoring methods in the intensive care unit Pulmonary candidiasis presenting as tumor-like shadow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1