Benchmarking Evaluation of Environmental Impact Assessment Studies Case Study: New Burg El Arab City– Alexandria – Egypt

E. Badr, A. Laban, A. Zahran
{"title":"Benchmarking Evaluation of Environmental Impact Assessment Studies Case Study: New Burg El Arab City– Alexandria – Egypt","authors":"E. Badr, A. Laban, A. Zahran","doi":"10.21608/ijesr.2023.309148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is one of the great significance tools to achieve environmental sustainability. The objective of this research was to investigate the effectiveness of EIA practice in Egypt, through evaluation of the produced environmental impact statement (EIS) reports in New Burg El Arab City (Case study) using the Lee & Colley EIS review package. The study focuses on a comparison between different EIA studies conducted by the Egyptian Environmental Affair Agency (EEAA) and the Industrial Development Authority (IDA), emphasis areas for improving the EIA report quality, and make suggestions for future improvements. The Lee and Colley's EIS review package were modified to evaluate both EIA complete studies (B Scope, C and high-risk industrial projects) and EIA forms (A, B and low-risk industrial projects) in Alexandria, Egypt.The first modification of the EIS review package was used to evaluate the quality of (75) EISs complete study produced during the years 2016 and 2022.The results of This EISs evaluation revealed that approximately 75% of the total samples were satisfactory in quality. (36 EISs) 48% were good, (33 EISs) 44% borderline, (6 EISs) 8% poor. The second modification of the EIS review package was used to evaluate (80) environmental classification forms (A and B) during 2016 (EEAA) and to evaluate (100) low risk industrial projects during the period 2017-2022. The environmental classification forms (A and B) were evaluated that were submitted to the concerned Alexandria branch of the EEAA, and it was found that about 91% of the EIS samples were of acceptable quality. Of these (44 EISs), 55% were good, (36 EISs), 45% were border line. Moreover, the evaluation of low-risk industrial projects indicated that about 56% of the EISs samples were of acceptable quality. Of those (31EISs) 31% were good, (33EISs) 33% were borderline and (36EISs) 36% were poor. The research presents suggestions and recommendations for enhancement of EIA process in Egypt. The use of EIA guidelines, EIS reviewing criteria, environmental monitoring program, EIA consultant’s accreditation, consideration of alternatives and public consultation, all ensue an effective EIA system in Egypt along with protecting our environment /natural resources for us and further generation.","PeriodicalId":169728,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijesr.2023.309148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is one of the great significance tools to achieve environmental sustainability. The objective of this research was to investigate the effectiveness of EIA practice in Egypt, through evaluation of the produced environmental impact statement (EIS) reports in New Burg El Arab City (Case study) using the Lee & Colley EIS review package. The study focuses on a comparison between different EIA studies conducted by the Egyptian Environmental Affair Agency (EEAA) and the Industrial Development Authority (IDA), emphasis areas for improving the EIA report quality, and make suggestions for future improvements. The Lee and Colley's EIS review package were modified to evaluate both EIA complete studies (B Scope, C and high-risk industrial projects) and EIA forms (A, B and low-risk industrial projects) in Alexandria, Egypt.The first modification of the EIS review package was used to evaluate the quality of (75) EISs complete study produced during the years 2016 and 2022.The results of This EISs evaluation revealed that approximately 75% of the total samples were satisfactory in quality. (36 EISs) 48% were good, (33 EISs) 44% borderline, (6 EISs) 8% poor. The second modification of the EIS review package was used to evaluate (80) environmental classification forms (A and B) during 2016 (EEAA) and to evaluate (100) low risk industrial projects during the period 2017-2022. The environmental classification forms (A and B) were evaluated that were submitted to the concerned Alexandria branch of the EEAA, and it was found that about 91% of the EIS samples were of acceptable quality. Of these (44 EISs), 55% were good, (36 EISs), 45% were border line. Moreover, the evaluation of low-risk industrial projects indicated that about 56% of the EISs samples were of acceptable quality. Of those (31EISs) 31% were good, (33EISs) 33% were borderline and (36EISs) 36% were poor. The research presents suggestions and recommendations for enhancement of EIA process in Egypt. The use of EIA guidelines, EIS reviewing criteria, environmental monitoring program, EIA consultant’s accreditation, consideration of alternatives and public consultation, all ensue an effective EIA system in Egypt along with protecting our environment /natural resources for us and further generation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境影响评价的基准评价研究——案例研究:埃及亚历山大港阿拉伯新城
环境影响评价是实现环境可持续性的重要工具之一。本研究的目的是调查埃及环境影响评估实践的有效性,通过使用Lee & Colley环境影响评估包评估新堡El Arab市的环境影响评估报告(案例研究)。本研究重点比较了埃及环境事务管理局(EEAA)和工业发展局(IDA)开展的不同环境影响评估研究,强调了提高环境影响评估报告质量的领域,并提出了今后改进的建议。对Lee和Colley的环境影响评估包进行了修改,以评估埃及亚历山大的环境影响评估完整研究(B范围、C和高风险工业项目)和环境影响评估表格(A、B和低风险工业项目)。EIS审查包的第一次修改用于评估2016年至2022年期间(75)项EIS完整研究的质量。该eis评估的结果显示,大约75%的总样品质量满意。36例良好,33例一般,6例不良,占8%。EIS审查包的第二次修改用于评估2016年(EEAA)期间的80个环境分类表(A和B),并评估2017-2022年期间的100个低风险工业项目。对环境分类表(A和B)进行了评估,并将其提交给有关的EEAA亚历山大分支机构,发现约91%的环境影响报告书样本质量合格。44份eis中,55%为良好,36份eis中,45%为边界线。此外,对低风险工业项目的评估表明,约56%的eis样本质量可接受。其中(31名ei) 31%为良好,(33名ei) 33%为边缘,(36名ei) 36%为差。本研究提出了加强埃及环境影响评估程序的建议和建议。环境影响评估指南的使用、环境影响评估标准、环境监测计划、环境影响评估顾问的认证、替代方案的考虑和公众咨询,所有这些都是埃及有效的环境影响评估系统的基础,同时也为我们和子孙后代保护我们的环境/自然资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Groundwater Quality Evaluation for the Limestone Aquifer Utilizing Hydrochemical Characteristics and Imitative Techniques, Eastern Nile Valley, Egypt Halophytes Dispersion Patterns and Soil Salinity Concentration Across the Egyptian North-Western Mediterranean Coast Assessment of Drains Water Quality for Irrigation Purposes Using Pollution Indices in Egypt Benchmarking Evaluation of Environmental Impact Assessment Studies Case Study: New Burg El Arab City– Alexandria – Egypt Anaerobic Co Digestion of Kitchen Waste With Cattle Dung and Poultry Manure A Means to Overcome The Problems of Anaerobic Mono Digestion and Improve The Production of Biogas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1