A Review on Brain Metastases Prognostic Scoring Systems

E. Topkan, A. Kucuk, D. Sezen, S. Senyurek, Eyub Yasar Aydemir, N. Durankus, Y. Bolukbasi, B. Pehlivan, U. Selek
{"title":"A Review on Brain Metastases Prognostic Scoring Systems","authors":"E. Topkan, A. Kucuk, D. Sezen, S. Senyurek, Eyub Yasar Aydemir, N. Durankus, Y. Bolukbasi, B. Pehlivan, U. Selek","doi":"10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v1/11258d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most common intracranial tumors, and nearly 25% of all cancer patients are diagnosed with this poor prognostic disease condition somewhere during their treatment course. Depending on the potential patient's general well-being status, the main prevailing treatment options typically incorporate palliative radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted agents, immunotherapy, best supportive care, and less frequently surgery in select patients. Past investigations demonstrated the probability to stratify BM patients into particular prognostic gatherings according to the credible combinations of multiple patients- and tumor-related features: the prognostic scoring systems. Such frameworks may serve usefully in the accurate prediction of survival outcomes and the appropriate selection of the best-fit treatment elective. In this present review, we intended to survey the advantages and disadvantages of the broadly recognized on-the-spot prognostic scoring systems for BMs and their clinical merits.","PeriodicalId":360142,"journal":{"name":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 1","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v1/11258d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most common intracranial tumors, and nearly 25% of all cancer patients are diagnosed with this poor prognostic disease condition somewhere during their treatment course. Depending on the potential patient's general well-being status, the main prevailing treatment options typically incorporate palliative radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted agents, immunotherapy, best supportive care, and less frequently surgery in select patients. Past investigations demonstrated the probability to stratify BM patients into particular prognostic gatherings according to the credible combinations of multiple patients- and tumor-related features: the prognostic scoring systems. Such frameworks may serve usefully in the accurate prediction of survival outcomes and the appropriate selection of the best-fit treatment elective. In this present review, we intended to survey the advantages and disadvantages of the broadly recognized on-the-spot prognostic scoring systems for BMs and their clinical merits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑转移瘤预后评分系统综述
脑转移瘤(BMs)是最常见的颅内肿瘤,近25%的癌症患者在治疗过程中被诊断为这种预后不良的疾病。根据潜在患者的总体健康状况,主要的主流治疗方案通常包括姑息放疗、化疗、靶向药物、免疫治疗、最佳支持性护理和少数患者的手术。过去的研究表明,根据多个患者和肿瘤相关特征的可信组合,有可能将BM患者分层为特定的预后集合:预后评分系统。这样的框架可能有助于准确预测生存结果和适当选择最适合的治疗方案。在本综述中,我们旨在调查广泛认可的脑转移现场预后评分系统的优缺点及其临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Brief Study on Rectus Sheath Hematoma Study on Association of Serum Uric Acid, Homocystine and Ferritin among Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients in Bangladesh A Rare Case Report of Acute T-cell Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Presenting with Cutaneous Involvement in a Child Study of Fibroepithelial Lesions of Breast at a tertiary Care Centre- an Audit, Clinicopathological APPROACH and Comparison with WHO Grading A Review on Brain Metastases Prognostic Scoring Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1