Aerospace-electronics reliability-assurance (AERA): Three-step prognostics-and-health-monitoring (PHM) modeling approach

Ephraim Suhir
{"title":"Aerospace-electronics reliability-assurance (AERA): Three-step prognostics-and-health-monitoring (PHM) modeling approach","authors":"Ephraim Suhir","doi":"10.1109/EUROSIME.2016.7463293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When encountering a particular reliability problem at the design, fabrication, testing, or an operation stage of an electronics product's life, and considering the use of predictive modeling to assess the seriousness and possible consequences of its detected malfunction and likely failure, one has to choose whether a statistical, or a physics-of-failure-based, or a suitable combination of these two major predictive modeling tools should be employed to address the problem and to decide on how to proceed. An effective aerospace-electronics reliability-assurance (AERA) approach is suggested as a possible way to go in such a situation. In this approach the classical statistical Bayes formula (BF) is used at the first step as a technical diagnostics (TD) tool, with an objective to identify, on the probabilistic basis, the faulty (malfunctioning) device(s) from the obtained prognostics-and-health-monitoring (PHM) signals (\"symptoms of faults\"). The physics-of-failure-based Boltzmann-Arrhenius-Zhurkov's (BAZ) equation, a powerful, flexible and physically meaningful modeling tool suggested about five years ago can be employed at the second step with an objective is to assess the remaining useful life (RUL) of the malfunctioning device(s). If the predicted RUL is still long enough, no action might be needed, but if not, a corrective (restoration) action becomes necessary. It is shown in this connection how short/long the repair time should/could be, so that the availability of the equipment (the probability that it is sound and available to the user when needed) does not fall below the allowable level. In any event, after the first two steps of the AERA modeling effort are carried out, and the assessed probability of the product's continuing operation is found to be satisfactory, the device is put back into operation (testing). If failure nonetheless occurs, the third AERA step should be undertaken to update reliability. A well-known four-parametric statistical beta-distribution (BD), in which the probability of failure is treated as a random variable, can be used at this step. The general AERA concept is illustrated by a detailed numerical example geared to an en-route flight mission. The approach can be used, however, also beyond the aerospace field in other vehicular technologies: maritime, automotive, railroad, etc.","PeriodicalId":438097,"journal":{"name":"2016 17th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 17th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EUROSIME.2016.7463293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When encountering a particular reliability problem at the design, fabrication, testing, or an operation stage of an electronics product's life, and considering the use of predictive modeling to assess the seriousness and possible consequences of its detected malfunction and likely failure, one has to choose whether a statistical, or a physics-of-failure-based, or a suitable combination of these two major predictive modeling tools should be employed to address the problem and to decide on how to proceed. An effective aerospace-electronics reliability-assurance (AERA) approach is suggested as a possible way to go in such a situation. In this approach the classical statistical Bayes formula (BF) is used at the first step as a technical diagnostics (TD) tool, with an objective to identify, on the probabilistic basis, the faulty (malfunctioning) device(s) from the obtained prognostics-and-health-monitoring (PHM) signals ("symptoms of faults"). The physics-of-failure-based Boltzmann-Arrhenius-Zhurkov's (BAZ) equation, a powerful, flexible and physically meaningful modeling tool suggested about five years ago can be employed at the second step with an objective is to assess the remaining useful life (RUL) of the malfunctioning device(s). If the predicted RUL is still long enough, no action might be needed, but if not, a corrective (restoration) action becomes necessary. It is shown in this connection how short/long the repair time should/could be, so that the availability of the equipment (the probability that it is sound and available to the user when needed) does not fall below the allowable level. In any event, after the first two steps of the AERA modeling effort are carried out, and the assessed probability of the product's continuing operation is found to be satisfactory, the device is put back into operation (testing). If failure nonetheless occurs, the third AERA step should be undertaken to update reliability. A well-known four-parametric statistical beta-distribution (BD), in which the probability of failure is treated as a random variable, can be used at this step. The general AERA concept is illustrated by a detailed numerical example geared to an en-route flight mission. The approach can be used, however, also beyond the aerospace field in other vehicular technologies: maritime, automotive, railroad, etc.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
航空航天电子可靠性保证(AERA):三步预测和健康监测(PHM)建模方法
当在电子产品的设计、制造、测试或操作阶段遇到特定的可靠性问题时,并考虑使用预测建模来评估其检测到的故障和可能的故障的严重性和可能的后果,人们必须选择是基于统计还是基于物理故障,或者应该使用这两种主要预测建模工具的适当组合来解决问题并决定如何进行。提出了一种有效的航空电子可靠性保证(AERA)方法作为应对这种情况的可行方法。在这种方法中,第一步使用经典的统计贝叶斯公式(BF)作为技术诊断(TD)工具,目的是根据获得的预后和健康监测(PHM)信号(“故障症状”)在概率基础上识别故障(故障)设备。基于故障物理的Boltzmann-Arrhenius-Zhurkov (BAZ)方程是一种强大、灵活且物理上有意义的建模工具,大约在五年前提出,可以在第二步中使用,其目标是评估故障设备的剩余使用寿命(RUL)。如果预测的RUL仍然足够长,则可能不需要任何操作,但如果不是,则需要进行纠正(恢复)操作。在这种情况下,维修时间应该/可以有多短/多长,才能保证设备的可用性(设备完好并在需要时可供用户使用的概率)不低于允许的水平。在任何情况下,在进行了前两步的AERA建模工作,并且发现产品继续运行的评估概率令人满意后,设备将重新投入运行(测试)。如果仍然发生故障,则应采取第三个AERA步骤来更新可靠性。一个众所周知的四参数统计beta分布(BD),其中故障概率被视为一个随机变量,可以在这一步使用。以航路飞行任务为例,详细说明了AERA的一般概念。然而,这种方法也可以用于航空航天领域以外的其他车辆技术:海事、汽车、铁路等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and modelling of a digital MEMS varactor for wireless applications Aerospace-electronics reliability-assurance (AERA): Three-step prognostics-and-health-monitoring (PHM) modeling approach Hybrid dynamic modeling of V-shaped thermal micro-actuators A systematic approach for reliability assessment of electrolytic capacitor-free LED drivers Numerical simulation of transient moisture and temperature distribution in polycarbonate and aluminum electronic enclosures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1