Measuring Gestalt therapy: a critique of the Gestalt Therapy Fidelity Scale

Dominic Hosemans
{"title":"Measuring Gestalt therapy: a critique of the Gestalt Therapy Fidelity Scale","authors":"Dominic Hosemans","doi":"10.53667/ctoi2211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Abstract: The GTFS is a 21-item measure developed by Fogarty et al. (2015, 2016, 2019) in order to measure therapist behaviours representative of Gestalt therapy (GT). The scale itself was developed as a step towards achieving evidence-based practice. It is essential that the scale can demonstrate its scientific robustness and hold up against thorough critique. The current paper offers a comprehensive critique of the scale, from the use of a fidelity scale in GT, to the scale’s initial development as well as the structure and utility of the scale. Herein a number of problems are identified and discussed, undermining the scale’s validity and reliability. For instance, theoretical inconsistency can be identified between the fidelity scale and the philosophical underpinning of GT coupled with a lack of rigour in the scientific process leading to the general nature of items. Although some validity analyses show promise for the scale, these have been performed in the absence of determining the soundness of the scale’s internal structure. Such a critique has great importance, considering the GTFS has the potential to influence future Gestalt research, therapy and supervision. Recommendations are made in order to proceed with the aim of establishing GT as an evidence-based practice. Keywords: Gestalt Therapy Fidelity Scale (GTFS), critique, scale development, evidence- based practice.\"","PeriodicalId":103162,"journal":{"name":"British Gestalt Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Gestalt Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53667/ctoi2211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Abstract: The GTFS is a 21-item measure developed by Fogarty et al. (2015, 2016, 2019) in order to measure therapist behaviours representative of Gestalt therapy (GT). The scale itself was developed as a step towards achieving evidence-based practice. It is essential that the scale can demonstrate its scientific robustness and hold up against thorough critique. The current paper offers a comprehensive critique of the scale, from the use of a fidelity scale in GT, to the scale’s initial development as well as the structure and utility of the scale. Herein a number of problems are identified and discussed, undermining the scale’s validity and reliability. For instance, theoretical inconsistency can be identified between the fidelity scale and the philosophical underpinning of GT coupled with a lack of rigour in the scientific process leading to the general nature of items. Although some validity analyses show promise for the scale, these have been performed in the absence of determining the soundness of the scale’s internal structure. Such a critique has great importance, considering the GTFS has the potential to influence future Gestalt research, therapy and supervision. Recommendations are made in order to proceed with the aim of establishing GT as an evidence-based practice. Keywords: Gestalt Therapy Fidelity Scale (GTFS), critique, scale development, evidence- based practice."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量格式塔治疗:对格式塔治疗忠实度量表的批判
摘要:格式塔治疗量表(GTFS)是由Fogarty等人(2015、2016、2019)开发的21项量表,旨在衡量格式塔治疗(GT)中具有代表性的治疗师行为。量表本身是作为实现循证实践的一个步骤而开发的。至关重要的是,该量表能够证明其科学的稳健性,并经得起彻底的批评。本文对该量表进行了全面的批判,从GT中保真度量表的使用,到量表的最初发展以及量表的结构和效用。本文指出并讨论了一些影响量表效度和信度的问题。例如,理论上的不一致可以在保真度量表和GT的哲学基础之间被识别出来,再加上科学过程中缺乏严谨性,导致了项目的一般性质。虽然一些效度分析显示了量表的前景,但这些分析是在没有确定量表内部结构的稳健性的情况下进行的。这样的批评非常重要,因为GTFS有可能影响未来的格式塔研究、治疗和监督。提出了建议,以便继续将GT建立为一种基于证据的实践。关键词:格式塔治疗忠诚量表(GTFS),批判,量表开发,循证实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards a relational/compassionate Gestalt understanding of trauma and addiction In and out the gender pail Gaslighting: how does a plant survive on fake watering? Artistic creativity as a resource in the work of the psychological support group of Kharkiv Institute of Gestalt and Psychodrama during wartime The Cure: working with separation and loss through song parody (lyric substitution)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1