Extent of corporate social responsibility reporting: India's transition from voluntary to mandatory regime

A. Bhatia, Amandeep Dhawan
{"title":"Extent of corporate social responsibility reporting: India's transition from voluntary to mandatory regime","authors":"A. Bhatia, Amandeep Dhawan","doi":"10.1504/IJSSM.2018.10014283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper is the first ever attempt that studies the transition of CSR disclosure practices in India from the voluntary to the mandatory regime. The study compares the CSR practices of Indian companies during the years 2013-2014 and 2015-2016; the former representing the voluntary regime of CSR while the latter representing its mandatory regime. Based on the CSR index given by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, the paper uses content analysis to collect the data on CSR parameters. The results show that the extent of CSR reporting has significantly gone up over the two points of time, thus supporting the institutional theory of CSR, evident also from the fact that even the expenditure incurred by companies in two different environmental conditions is appreciatively enhanced. The paper makes a plea to emphasise that there is greater need of stringent penalties for those non-implementers who do not adhere to the practice of CSR.","PeriodicalId":319298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2018.10014283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The present paper is the first ever attempt that studies the transition of CSR disclosure practices in India from the voluntary to the mandatory regime. The study compares the CSR practices of Indian companies during the years 2013-2014 and 2015-2016; the former representing the voluntary regime of CSR while the latter representing its mandatory regime. Based on the CSR index given by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, the paper uses content analysis to collect the data on CSR parameters. The results show that the extent of CSR reporting has significantly gone up over the two points of time, thus supporting the institutional theory of CSR, evident also from the fact that even the expenditure incurred by companies in two different environmental conditions is appreciatively enhanced. The paper makes a plea to emphasise that there is greater need of stringent penalties for those non-implementers who do not adhere to the practice of CSR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业社会责任报告的范围:印度从自愿向强制性制度的过渡
本文首次尝试研究印度企业社会责任披露实践从自愿向强制性制度的转变。本研究比较了2013-2014年和2015-2016年印度企业社会责任实践;前者代表企业社会责任的自愿性制度,后者代表企业社会责任的强制性制度。本文根据印度政府企业事务部给出的企业社会责任指标,采用内容分析法收集企业社会责任参数数据。结果表明,企业社会责任报告的程度在两个时间点上显著上升,从而支持了企业社会责任的制度理论,这也从企业在两种不同环境条件下的支出也明显增加这一事实中得到了证明。该文件呼吁强调,对于那些不遵守企业社会责任实践的非实施者,更需要严厉的惩罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing a sustainable higher educational institution through talent management practices and Islamic work ethics Key supplier retention for electrical and electronic industry: determinant factors Marriott's strategic sustainability priorities in the Chinese hotel industry Exploring the impact of healthcare agility and resilience on sustainable healthcare performance: moderating role of technology orientation The theory of planned behaviour and transformational leadership: an examination of corporate philanthropy among SMEs in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1