Validity and reliability of a one‐minute half sit‐up test of abdominal strength and endurance

M. H. Diener, L. Golding, D. Diener
{"title":"Validity and reliability of a one‐minute half sit‐up test of abdominal strength and endurance","authors":"M. H. Diener, L. Golding, D. Diener","doi":"10.1080/15438629509512042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abdominal muscle strength and endurance are widely assessed by means of a timed 1‐minute full sit‐up test, despite the more accepted use of half sit‐ups as a muscular strength and endurance exercise. In the present study, the validity and reliability of a 1‐minute half sit‐up protocol was investigated. A total of 142 different subjects participated in one of four studies designed to assess test‐retest reliability, interapparatus reliability, intertester reliability, and validity. Findings included very high test‐retest reliability (r = 0.98), moderately high interapparatus reliability (r = 0.71), and high intertester reliability (r = 0.76). The correlation of the half sit‐up test with the full sit‐up test of the National YMCA was 0.67 and the correlation with isometric abdominal strength was 0.38. The proposed half sit‐up test was found to be reliable and is proposed as an alternative method of evaluating abdominal strength and endurance.","PeriodicalId":403174,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15438629509512042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

Abdominal muscle strength and endurance are widely assessed by means of a timed 1‐minute full sit‐up test, despite the more accepted use of half sit‐ups as a muscular strength and endurance exercise. In the present study, the validity and reliability of a 1‐minute half sit‐up protocol was investigated. A total of 142 different subjects participated in one of four studies designed to assess test‐retest reliability, interapparatus reliability, intertester reliability, and validity. Findings included very high test‐retest reliability (r = 0.98), moderately high interapparatus reliability (r = 0.71), and high intertester reliability (r = 0.76). The correlation of the half sit‐up test with the full sit‐up test of the National YMCA was 0.67 and the correlation with isometric abdominal strength was 0.38. The proposed half sit‐up test was found to be reliable and is proposed as an alternative method of evaluating abdominal strength and endurance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一分钟半仰卧起坐腹部力量和耐力测试的效度和信度
腹肌力量和耐力被广泛地通过计时1分钟的全仰卧起坐测试来评估,尽管更被接受的是使用半仰卧起坐作为肌肉力量和耐力锻炼。在本研究中,研究了1分钟半仰卧起坐方案的有效性和可靠性。共有142名不同的受试者参与了四项研究中的一项,旨在评估测试-重测信度、仪器间信度、测试者间信度和效度。结果包括非常高的测试-重测信度(r = 0.98),中等高的仪器间信度(r = 0.71)和高的测试间信度(r = 0.76)。半仰卧起坐测试与全仰卧起坐测试的相关系数为0.67,与等长腹肌力量的相关系数为0.38。所建议的半仰卧起坐试验被认为是可靠的,并被建议作为评估腹部力量和耐力的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power spectrum of heart rate variability in exercising humans: The effect of exercise intensity Effects of drop jump height and technique on ground reaction force with possible implication for injury The Influence of an Aircast Sports Stirrup Ankle Brace on the Ankle Joint Proprioception of Professional Soccer Players A Comparison of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Deep Water Running and Treadmill Running: Considerations in the Prescription of Exercise Intensity Effects of two entrainment patterns on performance of female novice rowers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1