Effects of two entrainment patterns on performance of female novice rowers

L. Wiley, Jennifer Robinson, D. Reid, Gordon E. Shkurhan, Glen J. David, K. Coutts, D. Mckenzie
{"title":"Effects of two entrainment patterns on performance of female novice rowers","authors":"L. Wiley, Jennifer Robinson, D. Reid, Gordon E. Shkurhan, Glen J. David, K. Coutts, D. Mckenzie","doi":"10.1080/15438620109512094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Rowers who entrain breathing frequency to stroke rate do so in either a 1:1 or 2:1 pattern. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance and physiological difference that occurs between the practice of these two patterns of breathing. Methods: Fifteen novice female rowers (age =19.7 ± 1.6 yr.; body mass = 70.9 ±6.3 kg; height = 174.4 ±4.4 cm) were randomly assigned to complete a 2000 meter rowing ergometer test alternatively using each breathing pattern one week apart. Expired gases and breathing frequencies were measured using a Medical Graphics CPX‐D metabolic system. Heart rate (fc) was recorded using direct lead ECG. Stroke rate was obtained from the Concept II Ergometer. Results: Repeated measures MANOVA determined that when the breathing frequency was 2 breaths per stroke (2:1 versus 1:1), the time to complete the test was significantly shorter (490 ± 24.8 vs. 514 ± 11.3 s, p ≤ 0.05) and power output was greater (203.4 ± 21.5 vs. 184.5 ± 20.4 W, p ≤ 0.05). Oxygen uptake during each test did not differ significantly (2:1 = 2.7 ± 0.2; 1:1 = 2.5 ± 0.4 L/min, p > 0.05) despite an increased heart rate during the 2:1 trial (186.5 ± 8.9 vs. 175.7 ± 17.0 bpm, p = ≤ 0.05). The end tidal carbon dioxide tension (PETCO2) and tidal volume values were significantly lower during the 2:1 vs. the 1:1 condition (35.8±3.3vs. 45.1±3.4mmHg, p ≤ 0.05) and (2.1±0.3vs. 2.6 ± 0.3 L, p ≤ 0.05) respectively. Conclusion: Entrainment at 2 breaths per stroke results in a significant improvement in performance during a standard 2000 m rowing ergometer test compared to a 1:1 pattern of breathing. Entrainment of one breath per stroke leads to carbon dioxide retention, which may result in respiratory acidosis and a negative impact on performance.","PeriodicalId":403174,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15438620109512094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Rowers who entrain breathing frequency to stroke rate do so in either a 1:1 or 2:1 pattern. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance and physiological difference that occurs between the practice of these two patterns of breathing. Methods: Fifteen novice female rowers (age =19.7 ± 1.6 yr.; body mass = 70.9 ±6.3 kg; height = 174.4 ±4.4 cm) were randomly assigned to complete a 2000 meter rowing ergometer test alternatively using each breathing pattern one week apart. Expired gases and breathing frequencies were measured using a Medical Graphics CPX‐D metabolic system. Heart rate (fc) was recorded using direct lead ECG. Stroke rate was obtained from the Concept II Ergometer. Results: Repeated measures MANOVA determined that when the breathing frequency was 2 breaths per stroke (2:1 versus 1:1), the time to complete the test was significantly shorter (490 ± 24.8 vs. 514 ± 11.3 s, p ≤ 0.05) and power output was greater (203.4 ± 21.5 vs. 184.5 ± 20.4 W, p ≤ 0.05). Oxygen uptake during each test did not differ significantly (2:1 = 2.7 ± 0.2; 1:1 = 2.5 ± 0.4 L/min, p > 0.05) despite an increased heart rate during the 2:1 trial (186.5 ± 8.9 vs. 175.7 ± 17.0 bpm, p = ≤ 0.05). The end tidal carbon dioxide tension (PETCO2) and tidal volume values were significantly lower during the 2:1 vs. the 1:1 condition (35.8±3.3vs. 45.1±3.4mmHg, p ≤ 0.05) and (2.1±0.3vs. 2.6 ± 0.3 L, p ≤ 0.05) respectively. Conclusion: Entrainment at 2 breaths per stroke results in a significant improvement in performance during a standard 2000 m rowing ergometer test compared to a 1:1 pattern of breathing. Entrainment of one breath per stroke leads to carbon dioxide retention, which may result in respiratory acidosis and a negative impact on performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种诱导方式对女性新手赛艇成绩的影响
目的:划艇运动员按照1:1或2:1的比例来训练呼吸频率和划速。本研究的目的是调查的性能和生理差异发生在这两个模式的呼吸练习。方法:15名女性赛艇新手(年龄=19.7±1.6岁;体重= 70.9±6.3 kg;身高= 174.4±4.4 cm)的受试者随机分配,间隔一周交替使用每种呼吸模式完成2000米划船测力仪测试。使用Medical Graphics CPX - D代谢系统测量过期气体和呼吸频率。直接导联心电图记录心率(fc)。冲程速率由Concept II测功仪获得。结果:重复测量方差分析发现,当呼吸频率为每搏2次(2:1对1:1)时,完成测试的时间明显缩短(490±24.8 vs. 514±11.3 s, p≤0.05),输出功率更大(203.4±21.5 vs. 184.5±20.4 W, p≤0.05)。各试验期间摄氧量无显著差异(2:1 = 2.7±0.2;1∶1 = 2.5±0.4 L/min, p > 0.05),尽管在2∶1试验中心率增加(186.5±8.9 vs. 175.7±17.0 bpm, p =≤0.05)。与1:1条件相比,2:1条件下的末潮二氧化碳张力(PETCO2)和潮气量值显著降低(35.8±3.3vs)。45.1±3.4mmHg, p≤0.05)和(2.1±0.3vs。2.6±0.3 L, p≤0.05)。结论:在标准的2000米划船测力仪测试中,与1:1的呼吸模式相比,每次划水呼吸2次可以显著提高性能。每次划水一次呼吸导致二氧化碳潴留,这可能导致呼吸性酸中毒,并对表现产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power spectrum of heart rate variability in exercising humans: The effect of exercise intensity Effects of drop jump height and technique on ground reaction force with possible implication for injury The Influence of an Aircast Sports Stirrup Ankle Brace on the Ankle Joint Proprioception of Professional Soccer Players A Comparison of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Deep Water Running and Treadmill Running: Considerations in the Prescription of Exercise Intensity Effects of two entrainment patterns on performance of female novice rowers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1