What influences the willingness of citizens to coproduce public services? Results from a vignette experiment

Fabian Hattke, Janne Kalucza
{"title":"What influences the willingness of citizens to coproduce public services? Results from a vignette experiment","authors":"Fabian Hattke, Janne Kalucza","doi":"10.30636/JBPA.21.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing body of literature has investigated the involvement of private and third-sector organizations in the provision and maintenance of public goods. Still, there is little empirical knowledge about the reasons for individual citizens to coproduce public services. Research discusses several motivational and situational factors as important antecedents. We elaborate on this framework and test the effect of the relationships proposed by the literature in a survey experiment by modelling a realistic coproduction situation in the context of city waste management. Our results show that general motivations are not a predictor of the individual willingness to coproduce, while context-specific self-efficacy, intrinsic, and prosocial motivation are. Furthermore, access to coproduction resources and expected personal benefits positively influence the willingness to coproduce, while performance delay has a negative effect. A post-hoc analysis identifies two distinct types of coproducers: a decisive type, whose willingness is most strongly influenced by intrinsic motivation; and a flexible type whose coproduction intention only depends on situational factors. These detailed insights yield valuable implications for public administrations that want to engage citizens in the provision of public goods.","PeriodicalId":407938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30636/JBPA.21.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

A growing body of literature has investigated the involvement of private and third-sector organizations in the provision and maintenance of public goods. Still, there is little empirical knowledge about the reasons for individual citizens to coproduce public services. Research discusses several motivational and situational factors as important antecedents. We elaborate on this framework and test the effect of the relationships proposed by the literature in a survey experiment by modelling a realistic coproduction situation in the context of city waste management. Our results show that general motivations are not a predictor of the individual willingness to coproduce, while context-specific self-efficacy, intrinsic, and prosocial motivation are. Furthermore, access to coproduction resources and expected personal benefits positively influence the willingness to coproduce, while performance delay has a negative effect. A post-hoc analysis identifies two distinct types of coproducers: a decisive type, whose willingness is most strongly influenced by intrinsic motivation; and a flexible type whose coproduction intention only depends on situational factors. These detailed insights yield valuable implications for public administrations that want to engage citizens in the provision of public goods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么因素影响公民共同提供公共服务的意愿?小插图实验的结果
越来越多的文献研究了私营和第三部门组织参与提供和维持公共产品的问题。尽管如此,关于公民个人共同提供公共服务的原因,我们仍然缺乏经验知识。研究讨论了几个动机和情境因素作为重要的前因。我们详细阐述了这一框架,并通过在城市废物管理背景下模拟现实的合作生产情况,在调查实验中测试了文献中提出的关系的效果。我们的研究结果表明,一般动机不是个体共同生产意愿的预测因子,而情境特定的自我效能感、内在动机和亲社会动机是个体共同生产意愿的预测因子。获得合产资源和个人预期利益对合产意愿有正向影响,而绩效延迟对合产意愿有负向影响。事后分析确定了两种不同类型的合作生产者:一种是决定性类型,其意愿受内在动机的影响最大;灵活型,其合作意愿仅取决于情境因素。这些详细的见解为希望公民参与公共产品提供的公共行政部门提供了有价值的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bringing “Behavioral” Fully into Behavioral Public Administration Administrative Informatics Simon’s Behavior and Waldo’s Public Revisiting Our Assumptions About the Nature of Man Ambiguous COVID-19 Messaging Increases Unsafe Socializing Intentions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1