{"title":"Why Do Economists Like a Carbon Tax?","authors":"G. Metcalf","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In non-technical language, the chapter explains why economists favor putting a price on pollution as the least expensive way to cut pollution to its socially optimal level. Using a pollution example from nineteenth-century British law made famous by the Chicago economist Ronald Coase, the chapter lays out the principles for good environmental policy and shows how a carbon tax fits with those principles. It introduces Arthur C. Pigou, an early twentieth-century economist who saw that a tax on pollution could use the power of the market to solve the pollution problem. It then demonstrates that carbon taxes in British Columbia and Sweden have not harmed their economies but have helped reduce carbon pollution.","PeriodicalId":275101,"journal":{"name":"Paying for Pollution","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paying for Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In non-technical language, the chapter explains why economists favor putting a price on pollution as the least expensive way to cut pollution to its socially optimal level. Using a pollution example from nineteenth-century British law made famous by the Chicago economist Ronald Coase, the chapter lays out the principles for good environmental policy and shows how a carbon tax fits with those principles. It introduces Arthur C. Pigou, an early twentieth-century economist who saw that a tax on pollution could use the power of the market to solve the pollution problem. It then demonstrates that carbon taxes in British Columbia and Sweden have not harmed their economies but have helped reduce carbon pollution.
用非技术语言,本章解释了为什么经济学家倾向于给污染定价,因为这是将污染减少到社会最优水平的最便宜的方法。本章以19世纪英国污染法为例,阐述了良好环境政策的原则,并展示了碳税如何符合这些原则。该书介绍了20世纪早期的经济学家阿瑟·庇古(Arthur C. Pigou),他认为对污染征税可以利用市场的力量来解决污染问题。然后,它证明了不列颠哥伦比亚省和瑞典的碳税并没有损害他们的经济,而是帮助减少了碳污染。