Why Do Economists Like a Carbon Tax?

G. Metcalf
{"title":"Why Do Economists Like a Carbon Tax?","authors":"G. Metcalf","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In non-technical language, the chapter explains why economists favor putting a price on pollution as the least expensive way to cut pollution to its socially optimal level. Using a pollution example from nineteenth-century British law made famous by the Chicago economist Ronald Coase, the chapter lays out the principles for good environmental policy and shows how a carbon tax fits with those principles. It introduces Arthur C. Pigou, an early twentieth-century economist who saw that a tax on pollution could use the power of the market to solve the pollution problem. It then demonstrates that carbon taxes in British Columbia and Sweden have not harmed their economies but have helped reduce carbon pollution.","PeriodicalId":275101,"journal":{"name":"Paying for Pollution","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paying for Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In non-technical language, the chapter explains why economists favor putting a price on pollution as the least expensive way to cut pollution to its socially optimal level. Using a pollution example from nineteenth-century British law made famous by the Chicago economist Ronald Coase, the chapter lays out the principles for good environmental policy and shows how a carbon tax fits with those principles. It introduces Arthur C. Pigou, an early twentieth-century economist who saw that a tax on pollution could use the power of the market to solve the pollution problem. It then demonstrates that carbon taxes in British Columbia and Sweden have not harmed their economies but have helped reduce carbon pollution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济学家为什么喜欢碳税?
用非技术语言,本章解释了为什么经济学家倾向于给污染定价,因为这是将污染减少到社会最优水平的最便宜的方法。本章以19世纪英国污染法为例,阐述了良好环境政策的原则,并展示了碳税如何符合这些原则。该书介绍了20世纪早期的经济学家阿瑟·庇古(Arthur C. Pigou),他认为对污染征税可以利用市场的力量来解决污染问题。然后,它证明了不列颠哥伦比亚省和瑞典的碳税并没有损害他们的经济,而是帮助减少了碳污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What to Do with $200 Billion: Give It Back Why Do Economists Like a Carbon Tax? Enacting a Carbon Tax: How Do We Get There? Introduction: Why This Book? So You Want a Carbon Tax: How Do You Design It?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1