首页 > 最新文献

Paying for Pollution最新文献

英文 中文
Objections to a Carbon Tax 反对征收碳税
Pub Date : 2019-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0009
G. Metcalf
This chapter addresses common objections to a carbon tax including whether the science is settled enough to put a price on greenhouse gas emissions, whether the tax will hurt economic growth, or whether the tax will kill jobs. It dispels a number of myths about climate policy and coal mining while making the case for providing transitional relief to coal miners and other groups particularly hard hit by the tax. It also discusses how the tax can be designed to ensure that long-term emission reduction goals are met.
本章讨论了对碳税的普遍反对意见,包括科学是否足够成熟,可以为温室气体排放定价,碳税是否会损害经济增长,或者碳税是否会扼杀就业机会。它消除了一些关于气候政策和煤炭开采的神话,同时为煤矿工人和其他受税收打击特别严重的群体提供过渡性救济。它还讨论了如何设计税收以确保实现长期减排目标。
{"title":"Objections to a Carbon Tax","authors":"G. Metcalf","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses common objections to a carbon tax including whether the science is settled enough to put a price on greenhouse gas emissions, whether the tax will hurt economic growth, or whether the tax will kill jobs. It dispels a number of myths about climate policy and coal mining while making the case for providing transitional relief to coal miners and other groups particularly hard hit by the tax. It also discusses how the tax can be designed to ensure that long-term emission reduction goals are met.","PeriodicalId":275101,"journal":{"name":"Paying for Pollution","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129007745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Climate Change: What’s the Big Deal? 气候变化:有什么大不了的?
Pub Date : 2019-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0002
G. Metcalf
Droughts, floods, soaring temperatures, sea-level rise, and melting ice are just some of the damages brought about by climate change. Chapter 1 details the cost of our failure to cut our emissions, from crop-destroying droughts to devastating floods. It also documents the inexorable build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere as demonstrated by the Keeling curve and observations from Antarctic ice core samples. The chapter then provides a brief history of the science linking the build-up of atmospheric greenhouse gases and climate damages.
干旱、洪水、气温飙升、海平面上升和冰融化只是气候变化带来的一些损害。第一章详细描述了我们未能减少排放的代价,从破坏庄稼的干旱到毁灭性的洪水。它还记录了大气中温室气体不可阻挡的累积,正如基林曲线和对南极冰芯样本的观察所证明的那样。然后,本章简要介绍了将大气温室气体的积累与气候破坏联系起来的科学史。
{"title":"Climate Change: What’s the Big Deal?","authors":"G. Metcalf","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"Droughts, floods, soaring temperatures, sea-level rise, and melting ice are just some of the damages brought about by climate change. Chapter 1 details the cost of our failure to cut our emissions, from crop-destroying droughts to devastating floods. It also documents the inexorable build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere as demonstrated by the Keeling curve and observations from Antarctic ice core samples. The chapter then provides a brief history of the science linking the build-up of atmospheric greenhouse gases and climate damages.","PeriodicalId":275101,"journal":{"name":"Paying for Pollution","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132758299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What to Do with $200 Billion: Give It Back 如何处置2000亿美元:还回去
Pub Date : 2019-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0007
G. Metcalf
This chapter discusses how economists measure the burden of a carbon tax—which households have less spending power because of the tax. It also discusses fairness in the tax code and how the revenue, which can be substantial, from a carbon tax can be returned to households and businesses in ways that enhance the fairness and efficiency of the overall tax system. A common belief is that a carbon tax is regressive—that it disproportionately burdens poor households. Studies discussed in this chapter refute this belief and argue that judicious use of the carbon tax revenue can make a carbon tax reform (tax and return of the revenue) even more progressive.
本章讨论经济学家如何衡量碳税的负担——由于税收,家庭的消费能力降低。报告还讨论了税法的公平性,以及如何将碳税带来的可观收入返还给家庭和企业,从而提高整个税收体系的公平性和效率。人们普遍认为,碳税是递减的——它给贫困家庭带来了不成比例的负担。本章讨论的研究驳斥了这一观点,并认为明智地使用碳税收入可以使碳税改革(税收和收入返还)更加进步。
{"title":"What to Do with $200 Billion: Give It Back","authors":"G. Metcalf","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses how economists measure the burden of a carbon tax—which households have less spending power because of the tax. It also discusses fairness in the tax code and how the revenue, which can be substantial, from a carbon tax can be returned to households and businesses in ways that enhance the fairness and efficiency of the overall tax system. A common belief is that a carbon tax is regressive—that it disproportionately burdens poor households. Studies discussed in this chapter refute this belief and argue that judicious use of the carbon tax revenue can make a carbon tax reform (tax and return of the revenue) even more progressive.","PeriodicalId":275101,"journal":{"name":"Paying for Pollution","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116307570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
So You Want a Carbon Tax: How Do You Design It? 如果你想征收碳税,你该如何设计?
Pub Date : 2019-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0008
G. Metcalf
This chapter reviews the nuts and bolts of implementing a carbon tax. Invoking principles of administrative simplicity, ease of compliance, and avoidance of design features that dilute the price signal, it gives practical advice on who should be responsible for collecting the tax and remitting it to the government. It explains how the tax should handle the possibility that we can capture and permanently store carbon dioxide emissions and how we should tax emissions related to internationally traded goods so the United States is not disadvantaged in global trade. Finally, it identifies, and warns policymakers away from, various pitfalls in carbon tax design.
本章回顾了实施碳税的具体细节。它援引了管理简单、易于遵守和避免淡化价格信号的设计特征的原则,就谁应该负责征税并将其汇给政府提出了切实可行的建议。它解释了税收应该如何处理我们可以捕获和永久储存二氧化碳排放的可能性,以及我们应该如何对与国际贸易商品相关的排放征税,这样美国就不会在全球贸易中处于劣势。最后,它指出并警告政策制定者远离碳税设计中的各种陷阱。
{"title":"So You Want a Carbon Tax: How Do You Design It?","authors":"G. Metcalf","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0008","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews the nuts and bolts of implementing a carbon tax. Invoking principles of administrative simplicity, ease of compliance, and avoidance of design features that dilute the price signal, it gives practical advice on who should be responsible for collecting the tax and remitting it to the government. It explains how the tax should handle the possibility that we can capture and permanently store carbon dioxide emissions and how we should tax emissions related to internationally traded goods so the United States is not disadvantaged in global trade. Finally, it identifies, and warns policymakers away from, various pitfalls in carbon tax design.","PeriodicalId":275101,"journal":{"name":"Paying for Pollution","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125474825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Business as Usual: What Are the Costs? 一切如常:成本是什么?
Pub Date : 2019-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0003
G. Metcalf
This chapter describes the additional damages we will face if we don’t cut our carbon pollution. More frequent occurrences of extreme weather will cause more damages. We will also have to pay for stronger climate-proof infrastructure to adapt to new weather conditions and change our lifestyles to stay out of harm’s way. The chapter also addresses the uncertainties of climate change and suggests a way for climate skeptics to think about climate change. The example of Pascal’s Wager is used to illustrate why it is riskier not to act on climate change even in the face of uncertainty about the magnitude of the damages.
本章描述了如果我们不减少碳污染,我们将面临的额外损害。极端天气越频繁,造成的损害就越大。我们还必须为更强大的防气候基础设施买单,以适应新的天气条件,改变我们的生活方式,避免受到伤害。本章还讨论了气候变化的不确定性,并为气候怀疑论者提供了一种思考气候变化的方法。帕斯卡打赌的例子被用来说明,为什么即使面对损害程度的不确定性,不采取行动应对气候变化的风险更大。
{"title":"Business as Usual: What Are the Costs?","authors":"G. Metcalf","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter describes the additional damages we will face if we don’t cut our carbon pollution. More frequent occurrences of extreme weather will cause more damages. We will also have to pay for stronger climate-proof infrastructure to adapt to new weather conditions and change our lifestyles to stay out of harm’s way. The chapter also addresses the uncertainties of climate change and suggests a way for climate skeptics to think about climate change. The example of Pascal’s Wager is used to illustrate why it is riskier not to act on climate change even in the face of uncertainty about the magnitude of the damages.","PeriodicalId":275101,"journal":{"name":"Paying for Pollution","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126365817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enacting a Carbon Tax: How Do We Get There? 制定碳税:我们如何实现这一目标?
Pub Date : 2019-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0010
G. Metcalf
The final chapter lays out a policy framework for building political support to enact a carbon tax. The framework can focus policymakers on the task at hand and instill discipline in the legislative process. The carbon tax should be revenue neutral, contribute to fairness in the tax system, streamline climate policy, and lead to significant emission reductions over time. The chapter goes on to explain why those are key elements of a policy framework through which bipartisan support for a carbon tax could be possible.
最后一章提出了一个政策框架,为制定碳税提供政治支持。该框架可以使政策制定者专注于手头的任务,并在立法过程中灌输纪律。碳税应该是收入中性的,有助于税收制度的公平,简化气候政策,并随着时间的推移导致显著的减排。本章接着解释了为什么这些是政策框架的关键要素,通过这些因素,两党对碳税的支持才有可能实现。
{"title":"Enacting a Carbon Tax: How Do We Get There?","authors":"G. Metcalf","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0010","url":null,"abstract":"The final chapter lays out a policy framework for building political support to enact a carbon tax. The framework can focus policymakers on the task at hand and instill discipline in the legislative process. The carbon tax should be revenue neutral, contribute to fairness in the tax system, streamline climate policy, and lead to significant emission reductions over time. The chapter goes on to explain why those are key elements of a policy framework through which bipartisan support for a carbon tax could be possible.","PeriodicalId":275101,"journal":{"name":"Paying for Pollution","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122451632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction: Why This Book? 引言:为什么要写这本书?
Pub Date : 2019-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0001
G. Metcalf
The introduction provides an overview of the argument of the book that climate change has real costs we are paying right now. Greenhouse emissions are changing our climate and our current policies are inadequate to the task of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. A carbon tax uses the power of the market to reduce emissions without onerous regulations. It uses the power of market forces to reduce emissions without burdening businesses with paperwork and red tape. As such, it should have bipartisan appeal.
引言部分概述了这本书的论点,即气候变化有我们现在正在付出的实际代价。温室气体排放正在改变我们的气候,而我们目前的政策不足以完成减少温室气体排放的任务。碳税利用市场的力量来减少排放,而不需要繁琐的监管。它利用市场力量来减少排放,而不给企业带来文书工作和繁文缛节的负担。因此,它应该具有两党的吸引力。
{"title":"Introduction: Why This Book?","authors":"G. Metcalf","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0001","url":null,"abstract":"The introduction provides an overview of the argument of the book that climate change has real costs we are paying right now. Greenhouse emissions are changing our climate and our current policies are inadequate to the task of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. A carbon tax uses the power of the market to reduce emissions without onerous regulations. It uses the power of market forces to reduce emissions without burdening businesses with paperwork and red tape. As such, it should have bipartisan appeal.","PeriodicalId":275101,"journal":{"name":"Paying for Pollution","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124962564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cap and Trade: The Other Way to Price Pollution 限额与交易:污染定价的另一种方式
Pub Date : 2019-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0006
G. Metcalf
This chapter reviews another way to put a price on pollution: establishing a cap and trade program. It describes what cap and trade is, how it puts a price on pollution, and its use around the world. The chapter then goes on to make a case for why a carbon tax is a better approach than cap and trade for pricing carbon pollution in the United States. While either cap and trade or a carbon tax is preferable to the other options discussed in chapter 4, a carbon tax still has significant advantages over cap and trade.
本章回顾了另一种为污染定价的方法:建立限额与交易计划。它描述了什么是限额与交易,它是如何给污染定价的,以及它在世界各地的使用情况。这一章接着阐述了为什么在美国征收碳税比限额与交易制度更好地为碳污染定价。尽管与第四章讨论的其他方案相比,限额与交易或碳税都更可取,但碳税仍比限额与交易有显著优势。
{"title":"Cap and Trade: The Other Way to Price Pollution","authors":"G. Metcalf","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews another way to put a price on pollution: establishing a cap and trade program. It describes what cap and trade is, how it puts a price on pollution, and its use around the world. The chapter then goes on to make a case for why a carbon tax is a better approach than cap and trade for pricing carbon pollution in the United States. While either cap and trade or a carbon tax is preferable to the other options discussed in chapter 4, a carbon tax still has significant advantages over cap and trade.","PeriodicalId":275101,"journal":{"name":"Paying for Pollution","volume":"11 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131692645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Why Do Economists Like a Carbon Tax? 经济学家为什么喜欢碳税?
Pub Date : 2019-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0004
G. Metcalf
In non-technical language, the chapter explains why economists favor putting a price on pollution as the least expensive way to cut pollution to its socially optimal level. Using a pollution example from nineteenth-century British law made famous by the Chicago economist Ronald Coase, the chapter lays out the principles for good environmental policy and shows how a carbon tax fits with those principles. It introduces Arthur C. Pigou, an early twentieth-century economist who saw that a tax on pollution could use the power of the market to solve the pollution problem. It then demonstrates that carbon taxes in British Columbia and Sweden have not harmed their economies but have helped reduce carbon pollution.
用非技术语言,本章解释了为什么经济学家倾向于给污染定价,因为这是将污染减少到社会最优水平的最便宜的方法。本章以19世纪英国污染法为例,阐述了良好环境政策的原则,并展示了碳税如何符合这些原则。该书介绍了20世纪早期的经济学家阿瑟·庇古(Arthur C. Pigou),他认为对污染征税可以利用市场的力量来解决污染问题。然后,它证明了不列颠哥伦比亚省和瑞典的碳税并没有损害他们的经济,而是帮助减少了碳污染。
{"title":"Why Do Economists Like a Carbon Tax?","authors":"G. Metcalf","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190694197.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"In non-technical language, the chapter explains why economists favor putting a price on pollution as the least expensive way to cut pollution to its socially optimal level. Using a pollution example from nineteenth-century British law made famous by the Chicago economist Ronald Coase, the chapter lays out the principles for good environmental policy and shows how a carbon tax fits with those principles. It introduces Arthur C. Pigou, an early twentieth-century economist who saw that a tax on pollution could use the power of the market to solve the pollution problem. It then demonstrates that carbon taxes in British Columbia and Sweden have not harmed their economies but have helped reduce carbon pollution.","PeriodicalId":275101,"journal":{"name":"Paying for Pollution","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117263750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Isn’t There a Better Way? (No, There Isn’t) 难道没有更好的办法吗?(不,没有)
Pub Date : 2019-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0005
G. Metcalf
This chapter reviews alternative approaches to putting a price on pollution to control greenhouse gas emissions. It reviews the history of the Clean Air Act and Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards and demonstrates that these policies cut pollution at a much higher cost than by simply putting a price on pollution. It also reviews subsidies for clean energy, state-level renewable portfolio standards, and information and voluntary programs and demonstrates that a carbon tax is superior to any of these alternatives.
本章回顾了为污染定价以控制温室气体排放的各种方法。它回顾了《清洁空气法》和企业平均燃料经济性(CAFE)标准的历史,并证明这些政策以比简单地为污染定价高得多的代价来减少污染。报告还审查了清洁能源补贴、州级可再生能源组合标准、信息和自愿项目,并表明碳税优于上述任何一种替代方案。
{"title":"Isn’t There a Better Way? (No, There Isn’t)","authors":"G. Metcalf","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190694197.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews alternative approaches to putting a price on pollution to control greenhouse gas emissions. It reviews the history of the Clean Air Act and Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards and demonstrates that these policies cut pollution at a much higher cost than by simply putting a price on pollution. It also reviews subsidies for clean energy, state-level renewable portfolio standards, and information and voluntary programs and demonstrates that a carbon tax is superior to any of these alternatives.","PeriodicalId":275101,"journal":{"name":"Paying for Pollution","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132977398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Paying for Pollution
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1