Carbon and fossil resource depletion footprints of milk production from Canterbury dairy farms

A. Mazzetto, S. Falconer, S. Ledgard
{"title":"Carbon and fossil resource depletion footprints of milk production from Canterbury dairy farms","authors":"A. Mazzetto, S. Falconer, S. Ledgard","doi":"10.33584/rps.17.2021.3482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the different sustainability metrics, the carbon footprint is the most commonly reported, but the depletion of non-renewable resources such as fossil fuels, is also important. This study aimed to calculate the “cradle to farm-gate” carbon and fossil resource depletion footprint of milk production in Canterbury, New Zealand, comparing two different farm systems: one pasture-based with a relatively small amount of brought-in feed (Lincoln University Dairy Farm, LUDF) and an average Canterbury farm. The estimate of the carbon footprint of milk production was 0.68 and 0.80 kg CO2-eq/kg of fat and protein-corrected milk (FPCM) for the LUDF and Canterbury average, respectively. The main contributor to the carbon footprint for both farms was enteric fermentation, but differences were found mainly in the emissions from the supplementary feed. Conversely, the Canterbury average farm showed lower fossil resource depletion footprint (1.05 MJ/kg FPCM) when compared with the LUDF farm (1.13 MJ/kg FPCM). The differences were mainly related to fertiliser use. However, this difference is small if compared with farms overseas. The study shows that it is important to look at more than one environmental metric when proposing mitigation practices.","PeriodicalId":407057,"journal":{"name":"NZGA: Research and Practice Series","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NZGA: Research and Practice Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33584/rps.17.2021.3482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the different sustainability metrics, the carbon footprint is the most commonly reported, but the depletion of non-renewable resources such as fossil fuels, is also important. This study aimed to calculate the “cradle to farm-gate” carbon and fossil resource depletion footprint of milk production in Canterbury, New Zealand, comparing two different farm systems: one pasture-based with a relatively small amount of brought-in feed (Lincoln University Dairy Farm, LUDF) and an average Canterbury farm. The estimate of the carbon footprint of milk production was 0.68 and 0.80 kg CO2-eq/kg of fat and protein-corrected milk (FPCM) for the LUDF and Canterbury average, respectively. The main contributor to the carbon footprint for both farms was enteric fermentation, but differences were found mainly in the emissions from the supplementary feed. Conversely, the Canterbury average farm showed lower fossil resource depletion footprint (1.05 MJ/kg FPCM) when compared with the LUDF farm (1.13 MJ/kg FPCM). The differences were mainly related to fertiliser use. However, this difference is small if compared with farms overseas. The study shows that it is important to look at more than one environmental metric when proposing mitigation practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坎特伯雷奶牛场牛奶生产的碳和化石资源消耗足迹
在不同的可持续性指标中,碳足迹是最常被报道的,但化石燃料等不可再生资源的消耗也很重要。本研究旨在计算新西兰坎特伯雷牛奶生产的“从摇篮到农场大门”碳和化石资源消耗足迹,比较两种不同的农场系统:一种是牧场,引入饲料量相对较少(林肯大学奶牛场,LUDF),另一种是坎特伯雷的普通农场。根据LUDF和坎特伯雷的平均水平,牛奶生产的碳足迹估计分别为0.68和0.80千克二氧化碳当量/千克脂肪和蛋白质校正奶(FPCM)。两个养殖场碳足迹的主要贡献者是肠道发酵,但差异主要存在于补充饲料的排放。相反,与LUDF农场(1.13 MJ/kg FPCM)相比,坎特伯雷农场的平均化石资源消耗足迹(1.05 MJ/kg FPCM)较低。这种差异主要与肥料的使用有关。然而,与海外农场相比,这种差异很小。该研究表明,在提出缓解措施时,重要的是要考虑多个环境指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Greener Pastures: priorities for a low-footprint, high-value food producing future Resilient pastures Persistence of perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and cocksfoot following annual sowings: influence of grass species, ryegrass cultivar and pasture age on yield, composition and density Annual yield and botanical composition of four dryland grass species with or without nitrogen over six years Climatic factors influencing New Zealand pasture resilience under scenarios of future climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1