Research data services from the perspective of academic librarians

Soohyung Joo, Gisela Schmidt
{"title":"Research data services from the perspective of academic librarians","authors":"Soohyung Joo, Gisela Schmidt","doi":"10.1108/DLP-10-2020-0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate the perceptions of academic librarians regarding research data services (RDS) in academic library environments. This study also examines a range of challenges in RDS from the perspectives of academic librarians.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA nationwide online survey was administered to academic librarians engaged in data services at research universities around the USA. The collected survey responses were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive statistics, hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling.\n\n\nFindings\nAcademic librarians perceived that consultation services would be more valuable to users than technical services in offering RDS. Accordingly, skills associated with consultation services such as instructional skills and data management planning were perceived by participants to be more important. The results revealed that academic libraries would need to seek collaboration opportunities with other units on campus to develop and offer RDS, especially technical services.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to the existing body of research on the topic of data services in research universities. The study investigated various types of specific professional competencies and used clustering analysis to identify closely associated groups of service types. In addition, this study comprehensively examined both relevant resources for and barriers to RDS.\n","PeriodicalId":438470,"journal":{"name":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","volume":" 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-10-2020-0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the perceptions of academic librarians regarding research data services (RDS) in academic library environments. This study also examines a range of challenges in RDS from the perspectives of academic librarians. Design/methodology/approach A nationwide online survey was administered to academic librarians engaged in data services at research universities around the USA. The collected survey responses were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive statistics, hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling. Findings Academic librarians perceived that consultation services would be more valuable to users than technical services in offering RDS. Accordingly, skills associated with consultation services such as instructional skills and data management planning were perceived by participants to be more important. The results revealed that academic libraries would need to seek collaboration opportunities with other units on campus to develop and offer RDS, especially technical services. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing body of research on the topic of data services in research universities. The study investigated various types of specific professional competencies and used clustering analysis to identify closely associated groups of service types. In addition, this study comprehensively examined both relevant resources for and barriers to RDS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高校图书馆员视角下的数据服务研究
目的本研究旨在探讨学术图书馆馆员对研究数据服务(RDS)的认知。本研究还从学术图书馆员的角度探讨了RDS面临的一系列挑战。设计/方法/方法对美国研究型大学从事数据服务的学术图书馆员进行了一项全国性的在线调查。采用描述性统计、层次聚类和多维标度对收集到的调查结果进行定量分析。学术图书馆员认为,在提供RDS时,咨询服务比技术服务对用户更有价值。因此,与会者认为与咨询服务有关的技能,如教学技能和数据管理规划更为重要。结果显示,大学图书馆需要寻求与校园内其他单位合作的机会,以发展和提供RDS,特别是技术服务。原创性/价值本研究对研究型大学数据服务这一主题的现有研究做出了贡献。该研究调查了不同类型的特定专业能力,并使用聚类分析来识别密切相关的服务类型组。此外,本研究还全面考察了RDS的相关资源和障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A partnership between the library and the digital humanities scholars: interview with Plamen Miltenoff Identifying research fronts in NLP applications in library and information science using meta-analysis approaches Open access initiatives in European countries: analysis of trends and policies Cyber security in university libraries and implication for library and information science education in Nigeria The Cologne Public Library as accelerator of digitisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1