Victual Imperialism and U.S. Indian Policy

Rachel B. Herrmann
{"title":"Victual Imperialism and U.S. Indian Policy","authors":"Rachel B. Herrmann","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501716119.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter studies the rise of American victual imperialism in the 1790s. During the 1780s and 1790s, U.S. Indian commissioners had copied generous British diplomacy because they feared Native hunger. As the federal government gained an advantage over the states, U.S. officials tried to decrease the cost of such practices by telling Native Americans about alternative ways to prevent hunger: by producing crops, meat, and dairy. The Plan of Civilization relied upon the idea that Indians who adopted American notions of proper husbandry could become usefully independent, and could use less land to do so. By the mid-1810s, the Plan of Civilization's promoters had succeeded in decreasing food aid and distributing provisions that physically sickened Native Americans. The scheme, rather than preventing Indian hunger by transforming Indians into husbandmen, instead ate up Indians' territory while killing Indians. American victual imperialism worked alongside the Native and non-Native diplomacy that continued into the 1810s. Victual imperialism and food diplomacy both mischaracterized Native hunger while encouraging select groups of Indians to collaborate with non-Native officials to implement and enforce changes in the food system. Once this process was underway, victual imperialism replaced food diplomacy, and Native Americans lost this particular battle.","PeriodicalId":311322,"journal":{"name":"No Useless Mouth","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"No Useless Mouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501716119.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter studies the rise of American victual imperialism in the 1790s. During the 1780s and 1790s, U.S. Indian commissioners had copied generous British diplomacy because they feared Native hunger. As the federal government gained an advantage over the states, U.S. officials tried to decrease the cost of such practices by telling Native Americans about alternative ways to prevent hunger: by producing crops, meat, and dairy. The Plan of Civilization relied upon the idea that Indians who adopted American notions of proper husbandry could become usefully independent, and could use less land to do so. By the mid-1810s, the Plan of Civilization's promoters had succeeded in decreasing food aid and distributing provisions that physically sickened Native Americans. The scheme, rather than preventing Indian hunger by transforming Indians into husbandmen, instead ate up Indians' territory while killing Indians. American victual imperialism worked alongside the Native and non-Native diplomacy that continued into the 1810s. Victual imperialism and food diplomacy both mischaracterized Native hunger while encouraging select groups of Indians to collaborate with non-Native officials to implement and enforce changes in the food system. Once this process was underway, victual imperialism replaced food diplomacy, and Native Americans lost this particular battle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食物帝国主义与美国印第安政策
本章研究了18世纪90年代美国食品帝国主义的兴起。在18世纪80年代和90年代,美国印第安专员模仿了英国慷慨的外交政策,因为他们担心当地的饥饿。随着联邦政府获得了对各州的优势,美国官员试图通过告诉印第安人防止饥饿的其他方法来降低这种做法的成本:通过生产农作物、肉类和乳制品。《文明计划》基于这样一种理念:印第安人如果采纳了美国人的适当农牧观念,就可以有效地独立,而且可以使用更少的土地。到19世纪10年代中期,文明计划的推动者已经成功地减少了食物援助,并分发了使印第安人身体生病的食物。该计划并没有通过将印第安人转变为农民来防止印第安人饥饿,而是在屠杀印第安人的同时吞噬了印第安人的领土。美国的食物帝国主义与土著和非土著外交一起工作,一直持续到19世纪10年代。食物帝国主义和食物外交都错误地描述了土著的饥饿,同时鼓励选定的印第安人群体与非土著官员合作,实施和执行粮食系统的变革。一旦这个过程开始,食物帝国主义取代了食物外交,美洲原住民输掉了这场特殊的战斗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
5. Fighting Hunger, Fearing Violence after the Revolutionary War 4. Black Victual Warriors and Hunger Creation 1. Hunger, Accommodation, and Violence in Colonial America Victual Imperialism and U.S. Indian Policy Conclusion: Why Native and Black Revolutionaries Lost the Fight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1