Conclusion: Why Native and Black Revolutionaries Lost the Fight

Rachel B. Herrmann
{"title":"Conclusion: Why Native and Black Revolutionaries Lost the Fight","authors":"Rachel B. Herrmann","doi":"10.7591/9781501716133-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This concluding chapter explores why Native and black revolutionaries lost the fight against hunger. Indians and formerly enslaved people lost the fight against hunger not because they became bad at stopping it but because imperial officials gathered enough information to circumscribe Native Americans' and black colonists' abilities to prevent hunger themselves. Knowledge acquisition gave these white officials a specific kind of power over Native and black revolutionaries: the power to reinterpret histories of hunger. They had received education about Native appetites and how to satisfy and then manipulate those appetites as they implemented a policy of victual imperialism. Government officials who delegitimized Native and black hunger-prevention efforts interfered with other people's food sovereignty. They decided that Indians and formerly enslaved people were unqualified to decide what to grow, sell, cook, and eat, and they made it harder for those communities to feed themselves. Ultimately, their actions ignored centuries of Native hunger prevention and erased a short decade of free black colonists' efforts to act similarly.","PeriodicalId":311322,"journal":{"name":"No Useless Mouth","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"No Useless Mouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501716133-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This concluding chapter explores why Native and black revolutionaries lost the fight against hunger. Indians and formerly enslaved people lost the fight against hunger not because they became bad at stopping it but because imperial officials gathered enough information to circumscribe Native Americans' and black colonists' abilities to prevent hunger themselves. Knowledge acquisition gave these white officials a specific kind of power over Native and black revolutionaries: the power to reinterpret histories of hunger. They had received education about Native appetites and how to satisfy and then manipulate those appetites as they implemented a policy of victual imperialism. Government officials who delegitimized Native and black hunger-prevention efforts interfered with other people's food sovereignty. They decided that Indians and formerly enslaved people were unqualified to decide what to grow, sell, cook, and eat, and they made it harder for those communities to feed themselves. Ultimately, their actions ignored centuries of Native hunger prevention and erased a short decade of free black colonists' efforts to act similarly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结论:为什么土著和黑人革命者输掉了战斗
最后一章探讨了土著和黑人革命者在与饥饿的斗争中失败的原因。印第安人和以前被奴役的人在与饥饿的斗争中失败了,不是因为他们不善于阻止饥饿,而是因为帝国官员收集了足够的信息,限制了美洲原住民和黑人殖民者自己防止饥饿的能力。知识的获取使这些白人官员对土著和黑人革命者拥有了一种特殊的权力:重新解释饥饿历史的权力。他们接受了有关当地人胃口的教育,以及如何在实施食物帝国主义政策时满足和操纵这些胃口。政府官员剥夺了土著和黑人预防饥饿努力的合法性,干涉了其他人的粮食主权。他们认为印第安人和以前被奴役的人没有资格决定种植、销售、烹饪和食用什么,他们让这些社区更难养活自己。最终,他们的行动忽视了几个世纪以来土著居民预防饥饿的努力,抹杀了自由黑人殖民者在短短十年里采取类似行动的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
5. Fighting Hunger, Fearing Violence after the Revolutionary War 4. Black Victual Warriors and Hunger Creation 1. Hunger, Accommodation, and Violence in Colonial America Victual Imperialism and U.S. Indian Policy Conclusion: Why Native and Black Revolutionaries Lost the Fight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1