Islamic Seminaries: A Brief Historical Survey

Dr. Rifai Sulaiman Lebbe
{"title":"Islamic Seminaries: A Brief Historical Survey","authors":"Dr. Rifai Sulaiman Lebbe","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3857572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary objective of this article is to trace the origin, history, and development of learning seminaries in Islamic history. How did learning institutions develop in Islamic history? How do they differ from all other western and eastern non-Muslim educational institutes? Tracing the origin, history, and development of the institutions of learning in Islam, G. Makdisi argues that the concept of university education was originated and developed in Christian traditions. He further contends that the Institutions of learning in Islam originated and developed from a different social, religious, and cultural background. He argues that institutions of Madrasa and related cognate Islamic seminaries developed in different social and historical contexts. Therefore, the concept of university education has nothing to do with Islamic learning traditions. Yet, this claim has been challenged by some Muslim academics. Muslim academics and historians have claimed that the oldest university was originated and developed by Muslims following the intellectual renaissance during the Middle age in Abbasside caliphate. This article examines these claims and counterclaims to understand the nature and development of learning institutions in Islamic history. Moreover, this article also examines the ethos and philosophy of education in Islamic and Christian traditions to understand the aims and objective of education in both traditions. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part traces the origin and nature of Islamic education, the second part deals with history and development if Islamic seminaries, the third part analyses the consequence of the dichotomous attitudes of Muslims towards education. The final part underscores the importance of updating Islamic seminaries.","PeriodicalId":369373,"journal":{"name":"Epistemology eJournal","volume":"146 S281","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epistemology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3857572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective of this article is to trace the origin, history, and development of learning seminaries in Islamic history. How did learning institutions develop in Islamic history? How do they differ from all other western and eastern non-Muslim educational institutes? Tracing the origin, history, and development of the institutions of learning in Islam, G. Makdisi argues that the concept of university education was originated and developed in Christian traditions. He further contends that the Institutions of learning in Islam originated and developed from a different social, religious, and cultural background. He argues that institutions of Madrasa and related cognate Islamic seminaries developed in different social and historical contexts. Therefore, the concept of university education has nothing to do with Islamic learning traditions. Yet, this claim has been challenged by some Muslim academics. Muslim academics and historians have claimed that the oldest university was originated and developed by Muslims following the intellectual renaissance during the Middle age in Abbasside caliphate. This article examines these claims and counterclaims to understand the nature and development of learning institutions in Islamic history. Moreover, this article also examines the ethos and philosophy of education in Islamic and Christian traditions to understand the aims and objective of education in both traditions. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part traces the origin and nature of Islamic education, the second part deals with history and development if Islamic seminaries, the third part analyses the consequence of the dichotomous attitudes of Muslims towards education. The final part underscores the importance of updating Islamic seminaries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯兰神学院:一个简短的历史调查
本文的主要目的是追溯伊斯兰历史上学习型神学院的起源、历史和发展。伊斯兰历史上的学习机构是如何发展的?它们与其他西方和东方的非穆斯林教育机构有何不同?G. Makdisi追溯了伊斯兰教学习机构的起源、历史和发展,认为大学教育的概念起源于基督教传统。他进一步认为,伊斯兰教的学术机构起源于和发展于不同的社会、宗教和文化背景。他认为,伊斯兰学校和相关的伊斯兰神学院是在不同的社会和历史背景下发展起来的。因此,大学教育的概念与伊斯兰教的学习传统毫无关系。然而,这一说法受到了一些穆斯林学者的质疑。穆斯林学者和历史学家声称,这所最古老的大学是在中世纪阿拔赛德哈里发的智力复兴时期由穆斯林创立和发展的。本文考察了这些主张和反主张,以了解伊斯兰历史上学习机构的性质和发展。此外,本文还考察了伊斯兰教和基督教传统的教育精神和哲学,以了解这两种传统的教育目的和目标。本文共分为四个部分。第一部分追溯了伊斯兰教育的起源和本质,第二部分论述了伊斯兰神学院的历史和发展,第三部分分析了穆斯林对教育的两极化态度的后果。最后一部分强调了更新伊斯兰神学院的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Problems Encountered by School Managers in Supplying School Allowances and Expense Areas Islamic Seminaries: A Brief Historical Survey Four Components of Expertise Reducing Emergence: The Case Studies in Statistic Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics After 100 Years, the Time Has Come to Acknowledge That Boole and Keynes Founded a Mathematically, Technically, and Logically Advanced Approach to Imprecise Probability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1