Characteristics and outcomes of adolescents requiring admission to the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study

H. Al-Dorzi, Amirah Yaqoub, Fisal T Aldokhel, Khalid Alshuwaier, Sarah F Almujarri, Fatimah A Alkhaldi
{"title":"Characteristics and outcomes of adolescents requiring admission to the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"H. Al-Dorzi, Amirah Yaqoub, Fisal T Aldokhel, Khalid Alshuwaier, Sarah F Almujarri, Fatimah A Alkhaldi","doi":"10.4103/sccj.sccj_9_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Critically ill adolescents are not a well-studied patient population. The optimal setting (pediatric or adult intensive care unit [ICU]) for caring for them is not clear. This study assessed adolescents admitted to the adult ICU and compared the characteristics and outcomes of younger versus older patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study of adolescent patients aged 14–19 years who were admitted to an adult tertiary care ICU between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups, younger (14–16 years old) and older adolescents (17–19 years old). Results: The study included 276 patients; 105 patients were aged 14–16 years and 171 patients 17–19 years. Most patients were males (69.9%); only nine patients had body weights < 30 kg. Trauma was the most common reason for admission (36.2% of the younger group and 49.7% of the older group, P = 0.03) with sepsis being also common (19% of the younger group and 20.5% of the older group). Vasopressor therapy was required for 39.1% of patients and invasive mechanical ventilation for 58% (no between-group difference). The hospital mortality was 16.7% (odds ratio in younger versus older group adjusted for illness severity, 0.804; 95% confidence interval, 0.358–1.802). Mechanical ventilation duration and stay in the ICU and hospital were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Trauma was the most common reason for admission of adolescents aged 14–19 years to the adult ICU. The hospital mortality of younger and older adolescents was similar, suggesting that the management of younger adolescents in the adult ICU is safe.","PeriodicalId":345799,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Critical Care Journal","volume":"20 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Critical Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sccj.sccj_9_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Critically ill adolescents are not a well-studied patient population. The optimal setting (pediatric or adult intensive care unit [ICU]) for caring for them is not clear. This study assessed adolescents admitted to the adult ICU and compared the characteristics and outcomes of younger versus older patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study of adolescent patients aged 14–19 years who were admitted to an adult tertiary care ICU between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups, younger (14–16 years old) and older adolescents (17–19 years old). Results: The study included 276 patients; 105 patients were aged 14–16 years and 171 patients 17–19 years. Most patients were males (69.9%); only nine patients had body weights < 30 kg. Trauma was the most common reason for admission (36.2% of the younger group and 49.7% of the older group, P = 0.03) with sepsis being also common (19% of the younger group and 20.5% of the older group). Vasopressor therapy was required for 39.1% of patients and invasive mechanical ventilation for 58% (no between-group difference). The hospital mortality was 16.7% (odds ratio in younger versus older group adjusted for illness severity, 0.804; 95% confidence interval, 0.358–1.802). Mechanical ventilation duration and stay in the ICU and hospital were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Trauma was the most common reason for admission of adolescents aged 14–19 years to the adult ICU. The hospital mortality of younger and older adolescents was similar, suggesting that the management of younger adolescents in the adult ICU is safe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需要进入重症监护病房的青少年的特征和结果:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:危重青少年并不是一个被充分研究的患者群体。照顾他们的最佳环境(儿科或成人重症监护病房[ICU])尚不清楚。本研究评估了入住成人ICU的青少年,并比较了年轻患者和老年患者的特征和结果。方法:对2015年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间入住成人三级护理ICU的14-19岁青少年患者进行回顾性研究。患者分为两组,年龄较小的(14-16岁)和较大的青少年(17-19岁)。结果:共纳入276例患者;年龄14-16岁105例,17-19岁171例。患者以男性居多(69.9%);只有9例患者体重< 30kg。创伤是最常见的入院原因(36.2%的年轻组和49.7%的老年组,P = 0.03),败血症也很常见(19%的年轻组和20.5%的老年组)。39.1%的患者需要血管加压治疗,58%的患者需要有创机械通气(组间无差异)。住院死亡率为16.7%(经疾病严重程度调整后,年轻组与老年组的优势比为0.804;95%置信区间,0.358-1.802)。两组患者机械通气时间、ICU住院时间和住院时间相似。结论:创伤是14-19岁青少年进入成人ICU的最常见原因。青少年和大龄青少年的住院死亡率相似,提示在成人ICU对青少年的管理是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Antibiotic Treatment Duration for Bloodstream Infections in Critically Ill Patients: A National Survey of Kuwaiti Infectious Diseases and Critical Care Specialists Characteristics and outcomes of adolescents requiring admission to the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study Antibiotic treatment duration for bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: A national survey of Kuwaiti infectious diseases and critical care specialists Use of critical care ultrasound in Saudi Arabia: Questionnaire analysis Effects of different regimens of sedation on mechanically ventilated patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1