KISS Considered Harmful in Digitization of Medieval Chant Manuscripts

Louis W. G. Barton
{"title":"KISS Considered Harmful in Digitization of Medieval Chant Manuscripts","authors":"Louis W. G. Barton","doi":"10.1109/AXMEDIS.2008.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The KISS principle ('Keep It Simple, Stupid') is harmful in projects about digitizing medieval chant manuscripts. Such manuscripts contain various kinds of musical notations called 'neumes'. Some recent initiatives in this area have garnered recognition but have a troublesome disregard for normal scientific protocols of literature search and peer review. KISS methods of transcription that cover only late medieval, square-neume notation are harmful because they tend to fragment digital libraries of chant. In particular, early manuscripts with non-pitched neume notations are hugely important to chant scholarship; KISS data representations for pitched music on a cleffed staff are, however, not capable of handling the complexities and uncertainties of early neumation. Patience and serious scholarship are needed during the development of a unified data representation covering all neume notations. In the meantime, much important work can proceed in other areas such as cataloging, digital imaging, and transcription of chant texts.","PeriodicalId":250298,"journal":{"name":"2008 International Conference on Automated Solutions for Cross Media Content and Multi-Channel Distribution","volume":"375 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International Conference on Automated Solutions for Cross Media Content and Multi-Channel Distribution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AXMEDIS.2008.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The KISS principle ('Keep It Simple, Stupid') is harmful in projects about digitizing medieval chant manuscripts. Such manuscripts contain various kinds of musical notations called 'neumes'. Some recent initiatives in this area have garnered recognition but have a troublesome disregard for normal scientific protocols of literature search and peer review. KISS methods of transcription that cover only late medieval, square-neume notation are harmful because they tend to fragment digital libraries of chant. In particular, early manuscripts with non-pitched neume notations are hugely important to chant scholarship; KISS data representations for pitched music on a cleffed staff are, however, not capable of handling the complexities and uncertainties of early neumation. Patience and serious scholarship are needed during the development of a unified data representation covering all neume notations. In the meantime, much important work can proceed in other areas such as cataloging, digital imaging, and transcription of chant texts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中世纪圣歌手稿数字化中被认为有害的KISS
KISS原则(“Keep It Simple, Stupid”)在中世纪圣歌手稿数字化项目中是有害的。这些手稿包含了各种各样的音乐符号,称为“新符号”。最近在这一领域的一些举措获得了认可,但却令人烦恼地忽视了文献检索和同行评审的常规科学协议。KISS的转录方法只适用于中世纪晚期,方名记谱法是有害的,因为它们往往会破坏圣歌的数字图书馆。特别是,早期手稿与非音调的名词符号是非常重要的圣歌学术;然而,对于有音阶的音高音乐,KISS数据表示不能处理早期振动的复杂性和不确定性。在开发涵盖所有名称符号的统一数据表示过程中,需要耐心和认真的学术研究。与此同时,许多重要的工作可以在其他领域进行,如编目、数字成像和圣歌文本的转录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promotion of Cultural Heritage: Bronzes of Riace in a Cross-Media Approach Experiencing Digital Rights Management in Mobile Environments Automatic Alignment of Music Performances with Scores Aimed at Educational Applications Evaluating Recommender Systems KISS Considered Harmful in Digitization of Medieval Chant Manuscripts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1