Conscious Subjects, Conscious Unity, and Five Arguments for Anti-Combination

L. Roelofs
{"title":"Conscious Subjects, Conscious Unity, and Five Arguments for Anti-Combination","authors":"L. Roelofs","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190859053.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at five arguments that have been advanced to show that minds cannot combine (under the heading of the “combination problem for panpsychism”) and considers the options for addressing them. They are the subject-summing argument, the unity argument, the privacy argument, the boundary argument, and the incompatible contexts argument. All of these arguments, under scrutiny, turn out to rest on assumptions either about the metaphysics of subjects of experience or about the unity of consciousness, so this chapter contains some in-depth examination of these two topics. For both topics, there is room for a range of plausible but conflicting views, and so the chapter outlines a plan to sketch three different theories of mental combination, starting from different assumptions about subjects and unity.","PeriodicalId":188271,"journal":{"name":"Combining Minds","volume":"262 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Combining Minds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190859053.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter looks at five arguments that have been advanced to show that minds cannot combine (under the heading of the “combination problem for panpsychism”) and considers the options for addressing them. They are the subject-summing argument, the unity argument, the privacy argument, the boundary argument, and the incompatible contexts argument. All of these arguments, under scrutiny, turn out to rest on assumptions either about the metaphysics of subjects of experience or about the unity of consciousness, so this chapter contains some in-depth examination of these two topics. For both topics, there is room for a range of plausible but conflicting views, and so the chapter outlines a plan to sketch three different theories of mental combination, starting from different assumptions about subjects and unity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自觉主体、自觉统一与反联合的五种论证
本章着眼于已经提出的五个论证,这些论证表明思想不能结合(在“泛心论的结合问题”的标题下),并考虑解决这些问题的选择。它们是主体概括论、统一性论、私密性论、边界论和不相容语境论。经过仔细研究,所有这些论证都是建立在关于经验主体的形而上学或关于意识统一性的假设之上的,因此本章将对这两个主题进行深入探讨。对于这两个主题,有一系列看似合理但相互矛盾的观点,因此本章概述了一个计划,概述三种不同的心理结合理论,从不同的主体和统一假设开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Composite Subjectivity and Microsubjects The Problems of Structural Discrepancy Conscious Subjects, Conscious Unity, and Five Arguments for Anti-Combination Composite Subjectivity and Intelligent Subjects Composite Subjectivity and Psychological Subjects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1