Hybrid Models for Aspects Extraction without Labelled Dataset

W. Khong, Lay-Ki Soon, Hui-Ngo Goh
{"title":"Hybrid Models for Aspects Extraction without Labelled Dataset","authors":"W. Khong, Lay-Ki Soon, Hui-Ngo Goh","doi":"10.18653/v1/D19-6611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the important tasks in opinion mining is to extract aspects of the opinion target. Aspects are features or characteristics of the opinion target that are being reviewed, which can be categorised into explicit and implicit aspects. Extracting aspects from opinions is essential in order to ensure accurate information about certain attributes of an opinion target is retrieved. For instance, a professional camera receives a positive feedback in terms of its functionalities in a review, but its overly high price receives negative feedback. Most of the existing solutions focus on explicit aspects. However, sentences in reviews normally do not state the aspects explicitly. In this research, two hybrid models are proposed to identify and extract both explicit and implicit aspects, namely TDM-DC and TDM-TED. The proposed models combine topic modelling and dictionary-based approach. The models are unsupervised as they do not require any labelled dataset. The experimental results show that TDM-DC achieves F1-measure of 58.70%, where it outperforms both the baseline topic model and dictionary-based approach. In comparison to other existing unsupervised techniques, the proposed models are able to achieve higher F1-measure by approximately 3%. Although the supervised techniques perform slightly better, the proposed models are domain-independent, and hence more versatile.","PeriodicalId":153447,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER)","volume":"30 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-6611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the important tasks in opinion mining is to extract aspects of the opinion target. Aspects are features or characteristics of the opinion target that are being reviewed, which can be categorised into explicit and implicit aspects. Extracting aspects from opinions is essential in order to ensure accurate information about certain attributes of an opinion target is retrieved. For instance, a professional camera receives a positive feedback in terms of its functionalities in a review, but its overly high price receives negative feedback. Most of the existing solutions focus on explicit aspects. However, sentences in reviews normally do not state the aspects explicitly. In this research, two hybrid models are proposed to identify and extract both explicit and implicit aspects, namely TDM-DC and TDM-TED. The proposed models combine topic modelling and dictionary-based approach. The models are unsupervised as they do not require any labelled dataset. The experimental results show that TDM-DC achieves F1-measure of 58.70%, where it outperforms both the baseline topic model and dictionary-based approach. In comparison to other existing unsupervised techniques, the proposed models are able to achieve higher F1-measure by approximately 3%. Although the supervised techniques perform slightly better, the proposed models are domain-independent, and hence more versatile.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无标记数据集的方面提取混合模型
意见挖掘的重要任务之一是提取意见目标的各个方面。方面是被审查的意见对象的特征或特征,可分为显性方面和隐性方面。为了确保检索到关于意见目标的某些属性的准确信息,从意见中提取方面是必不可少的。例如,一款专业相机在评测中就其功能得到了正面的反馈,但其过高的价格却得到了负面的反馈。大多数现有的解决方案都侧重于显式方面。然而,评论中的句子通常不会明确地陈述各个方面。本研究提出了两种混合模型,即TDM-DC和TDM-TED来识别和提取显式和隐式方面。提出的模型结合了主题建模和基于字典的方法。模型是无监督的,因为它们不需要任何标记的数据集。实验结果表明,TDM-DC的f1度量值达到58.70%,优于基线主题模型和基于字典的方法。与其他现有的无监督技术相比,所提出的模型能够实现大约3%的更高的f1测量。尽管有监督的技术表现稍好,但所提出的模型是领域无关的,因此更通用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Veritas Annotator: Discovering the Origin of a Rumour Neural Multi-Task Learning for Stance Prediction Hybrid Models for Aspects Extraction without Labelled Dataset Relation Extraction among Multiple Entities Using a Dual Pointer Network with a Multi-Head Attention Mechanism Team GPLSI. Approach for automated fact checking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1