The Impact of Social Proof on Moral Decision-Making in Video Games

Vedant Sansare, Jake Rovere, Michael McEwan, Malcolm Ryan
{"title":"The Impact of Social Proof on Moral Decision-Making in Video Games","authors":"Vedant Sansare, Jake Rovere, Michael McEwan, Malcolm Ryan","doi":"10.1145/3450337.3483473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When we make ethical decisions in everyday life, our choices are often influenced by what we see others doing around us. In psychology, this phenomenon is known as social proof. When we are uncertain about what to do, we are likely to follow the crowd, especially if we identify with them. In this study, we examine how this behaviour extends to video games, and how it is influenced by other design factors such as time-limited decisions. We present the results of a quantitative study of player behaviour in a visual-novel game The Great Fire. Before making a decision, players are presented with statistics showing what other players chose. We manipulated these figures to display different choices as popular, under timed and untimed conditions. We present preliminary work-in-progress results that suggest that players are indeed influenced to follow the crowd when facing an ambiguous moral decision, but can also show unexpected behaviour when faced with the non-moral choice of calling a coin flip.","PeriodicalId":427412,"journal":{"name":"Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play","volume":"12 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3450337.3483473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When we make ethical decisions in everyday life, our choices are often influenced by what we see others doing around us. In psychology, this phenomenon is known as social proof. When we are uncertain about what to do, we are likely to follow the crowd, especially if we identify with them. In this study, we examine how this behaviour extends to video games, and how it is influenced by other design factors such as time-limited decisions. We present the results of a quantitative study of player behaviour in a visual-novel game The Great Fire. Before making a decision, players are presented with statistics showing what other players chose. We manipulated these figures to display different choices as popular, under timed and untimed conditions. We present preliminary work-in-progress results that suggest that players are indeed influenced to follow the crowd when facing an ambiguous moral decision, but can also show unexpected behaviour when faced with the non-moral choice of calling a coin flip.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子游戏中社会认同对道德决策的影响
当我们在日常生活中做出道德决定时,我们的选择往往会受到周围人行为的影响。在心理学中,这种现象被称为社会认同。当我们不确定要做什么的时候,我们很可能会随大流,尤其是当我们认同他们的时候。在这项研究中,我们研究了这种行为如何扩展到电子游戏中,以及它如何受到其他设计因素(如限时决策)的影响。我们展示了视觉小说游戏《the Great Fire》中玩家行为的定量研究结果。在做出决定之前,玩家会看到其他玩家的选择。我们对这些数据进行了处理,以显示在定时和非定时条件下受欢迎的不同选择。我们提出的初步研究结果表明,当玩家面临模棱两可的道德决定时,他们确实会受到随大流的影响,但当他们面临掷硬币这种非道德选择时,他们也会表现出意想不到的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Walt Disney Imagineering: Decades of Innovation and Play The Game of Video Game Objects: A Minimal Theory of when we see Pixels as Objects rather than Pictures Negotiating Systemic Racial and Gender Bias as a Minoritized Adult Design Researcher Videogame Rewards and Prosocial Behaviour Supporting the Design of Flexible Game Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1