Scaling studies of hot electron injection and interface-state generation in deep-submicron silicon mosfets: a monte carlo analysis

J. Ellis-Monaghan, R. Hulfachor, K.W. Kim, M. Littlejohn
{"title":"Scaling studies of hot electron injection and interface-state generation in deep-submicron silicon mosfets: a monte carlo analysis","authors":"J. Ellis-Monaghan, R. Hulfachor, K.W. Kim, M. Littlejohn","doi":"10.1109/DRC.1994.1009424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The simulation model employed in this study consists of an advanced ensemble Monte Carlo method, that incorporates two conduction energy bands from pseudopotential calculations, coupled with an interface-state genemtion model. It has been demonstrated that this coupled treatment can calculate interface-state generation with accuracy and a good overall agreement has been achieved between the simulated results and measured data in longchannel (l-pm) devices [ I]. Using the same methodology, we explored the implications of power-supply voltages driven by two widely used device-scaling approaches: constant field scaling [2] 'and a more generalized scaling [3]. Throughout this study, the devices are stressed for 120 seconds at Vds=2Vgs. For constant field scaling, we found that the simulated electron injection rates decreased from 6.4x102'/cm2sec at the location of peak electron injection for a 0.33-pin device with Vd,=3.3 V, to 2.4x10\"/cm2sec for a 0.12-pin device with Vd,=1.2 V. This corresponds to a predicted peak interface-state density of 7x10\"/cm2eV and 4.3x10\"/cm2eV for the 0.33-pm and 0.12-pm device, respectively. This decrease seems to be caused mainly by the reduced lateral field, (The \"constant\" lateral field methodology reduces the peak electric field from 170 kV/cm to 150 kV/cm for these short-channel devices.) On the other hand, the peak average electron energy is significantly reduced from 2.2 eV for the 0.33-pm device to 1.3 eV for the 0.12-pin device. When the generalized scaling scheme was applied, the simulated electron injection and interface-state generation rates increased considerably, from an interface-state generation density of 7x10\"/cm2eV for the same 0.33-pm device with Vh=3.3 V, to 9.2x10\"/cm2eV for a 0.12-pm device with Vd,=2.25 V. The corresponding peak electron injection rate for the 0.12-pm device was 1.1x1OZ2/cm2sec. For the generalized scaling scheme, the peak lateral field increased from 170 kV/cm to 240 kV/cm as the devices scaled down. The effect of power-supplyvoltage reduction was clearly seen in the average electron energy. The average energy at the location of pe'ak electron injection was significantly reduced, from 2.2 eV for the 0.33-pm device to 1.5 eV for the 0.12-pm device. Thus, the electron energy distribution appears to have strongly non-linear characteristics. While the average energy scales down with the power-supply voltage, the electrons in the high-energy tail of the distribution ciui bc enhanced (i.e., a longer tail) by the large peak electric field. These results for the two scaling approaches demonstrate the importance of hot electron degradation in deep-submicron MOSFETS operating below the 3 V power supply level.","PeriodicalId":244069,"journal":{"name":"52nd Annual Device Research Conference","volume":"1 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"52nd Annual Device Research Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRC.1994.1009424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The simulation model employed in this study consists of an advanced ensemble Monte Carlo method, that incorporates two conduction energy bands from pseudopotential calculations, coupled with an interface-state genemtion model. It has been demonstrated that this coupled treatment can calculate interface-state generation with accuracy and a good overall agreement has been achieved between the simulated results and measured data in longchannel (l-pm) devices [ I]. Using the same methodology, we explored the implications of power-supply voltages driven by two widely used device-scaling approaches: constant field scaling [2] 'and a more generalized scaling [3]. Throughout this study, the devices are stressed for 120 seconds at Vds=2Vgs. For constant field scaling, we found that the simulated electron injection rates decreased from 6.4x102'/cm2sec at the location of peak electron injection for a 0.33-pin device with Vd,=3.3 V, to 2.4x10"/cm2sec for a 0.12-pin device with Vd,=1.2 V. This corresponds to a predicted peak interface-state density of 7x10"/cm2eV and 4.3x10"/cm2eV for the 0.33-pm and 0.12-pm device, respectively. This decrease seems to be caused mainly by the reduced lateral field, (The "constant" lateral field methodology reduces the peak electric field from 170 kV/cm to 150 kV/cm for these short-channel devices.) On the other hand, the peak average electron energy is significantly reduced from 2.2 eV for the 0.33-pm device to 1.3 eV for the 0.12-pin device. When the generalized scaling scheme was applied, the simulated electron injection and interface-state generation rates increased considerably, from an interface-state generation density of 7x10"/cm2eV for the same 0.33-pm device with Vh=3.3 V, to 9.2x10"/cm2eV for a 0.12-pm device with Vd,=2.25 V. The corresponding peak electron injection rate for the 0.12-pm device was 1.1x1OZ2/cm2sec. For the generalized scaling scheme, the peak lateral field increased from 170 kV/cm to 240 kV/cm as the devices scaled down. The effect of power-supplyvoltage reduction was clearly seen in the average electron energy. The average energy at the location of pe'ak electron injection was significantly reduced, from 2.2 eV for the 0.33-pm device to 1.5 eV for the 0.12-pm device. Thus, the electron energy distribution appears to have strongly non-linear characteristics. While the average energy scales down with the power-supply voltage, the electrons in the high-energy tail of the distribution ciui bc enhanced (i.e., a longer tail) by the large peak electric field. These results for the two scaling approaches demonstrate the importance of hot electron degradation in deep-submicron MOSFETS operating below the 3 V power supply level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深亚微米硅mosfet中热电子注入和界面态生成的标度研究:蒙特卡罗分析
本研究中采用的模拟模型包括一种先进的集合蒙特卡罗方法,该方法结合了来自伪势计算的两个传导能带,以及界面状态生成模型。已经证明,这种耦合处理可以准确地计算界面状态生成,并且在长通道(l-pm)器件中模拟结果与测量数据之间取得了良好的总体一致性[1]。使用相同的方法,我们探索了由两种广泛使用的器件缩放方法驱动的电源电压的含义:恒定场缩放[2]和更广义的缩放[3]。在整个研究过程中,设备在Vds=2Vgs下承受120秒的压力。对于恒定场缩放,我们发现模拟的电子注入速率从0.33引脚Vd =3.3 V的峰值电子注入位置的6.4 × 102’/cm2sec下降到0.12引脚Vd =1.2 V的峰值电子注入位置的2.4 × 10’/cm2sec。这对应于0.33 pm和0.12 pm器件的预测峰值界面状态密度分别为7x10“/cm2eV和4.3x10”/cm2eV。这种下降似乎主要是由于侧场的减小引起的(“恒定”侧场方法将这些短通道器件的峰值电场从170 kV/cm降低到150 kV/cm)。另一方面,峰值平均电子能量从0.33 pm器件的2.2 eV显著降低到0.12引脚器件的1.3 eV。当采用广义标度方案时,模拟电子注入和界面状态生成速率显著增加,从相同的0.33 pm器件(Vh=3.3 V)的界面状态生成密度为7x10“/cm2eV,到0.12 pm器件(Vd =2.25 V)的界面状态生成密度为9.2x10”/cm2eV。0.12 pm器件对应的峰值电子注入速率为1.1 x10oz2 /cm2sec。对于广义缩放方案,随着器件尺寸的减小,峰值横向电场从170 kV/cm增加到240 kV/cm。在平均电子能量中可以清楚地看到供电电压降低的影响。pe’ak电子注入位置的平均能量显著降低,从0.33 pm器件的2.2 eV降至0.12 pm器件的1.5 eV。因此,电子能量分布似乎具有强烈的非线性特征。当平均能量随电源电压的减小而减小时,分布回路高能尾部的电子由于峰值电场的增大而增强(即长尾)。这两种标度方法的结果证明了热电子降解在工作在低于3v电源水平的深亚微米mosfet中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In/sub 0.29/Al/sub 0.71/As/In/sub 0.3/Ga/sub 0.7/As heterostructure devices grown on GaAs substrates with a metamorphic buffer design Ultra-high-speed rapid single-flux-quantum digital circuits. using a planarized-niobium-trilaver josephson junction technology High-brightness green light-emitting diodes Technology for monolithic integration of ridge-guided quantum well lasers and AlGaAs/GaAs/AlGaAs-HEMT electronics Resonant-cavity light emitting diodes with organic semiconductors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1