Classification of Discourse Coherence Relations: An Exploratory Study using Multiple Knowledge Sources

Ben Wellner, J. Pustejovsky, Catherine Havasi, Anna Rumshisky, R. Saurí
{"title":"Classification of Discourse Coherence Relations: An Exploratory Study using Multiple Knowledge Sources","authors":"Ben Wellner, J. Pustejovsky, Catherine Havasi, Anna Rumshisky, R. Saurí","doi":"10.3115/1654595.1654618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we consider the problem of identifying and classifying discourse coherence relations. We report initial results over the recently released Discourse GraphBank (Wolf and Gibson, 2005). Our approach considers, and determines the contributions of, a variety of syntactic and lexico-semantic features. We achieve 81% accuracy on the task of discourse relation type classification and 70% accuracy on relation identification.","PeriodicalId":426429,"journal":{"name":"SIGDIAL Workshop","volume":"81 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"81","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGDIAL Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/1654595.1654618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81

Abstract

In this paper we consider the problem of identifying and classifying discourse coherence relations. We report initial results over the recently released Discourse GraphBank (Wolf and Gibson, 2005). Our approach considers, and determines the contributions of, a variety of syntactic and lexico-semantic features. We achieve 81% accuracy on the task of discourse relation type classification and 70% accuracy on relation identification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语篇连贯关系分类:基于多知识来源的探索性研究
本文主要研究语篇连贯关系的识别和分类问题。我们报告了最近发布的Discourse GraphBank的初步结果(Wolf and Gibson, 2005)。我们的方法考虑并决定了各种句法和词汇语义特征的贡献。我们在篇章关系类型分类任务上达到了81%的准确率,在关系识别任务上达到了70%的准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Information State-Based Dialogue Manager for Call for Fire Dialogues A computational model of multi-modal grounding for human robot interaction Classification of Discourse Coherence Relations: An Exploratory Study using Multiple Knowledge Sources Balancing Conflicting Factors in Argument Interpretation Semantic and Pragmatic Presupposition in Discourse Representation Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1