Efficient designs for multiple gene knockdown experiments

B. Nazer, R. Nowak
{"title":"Efficient designs for multiple gene knockdown experiments","authors":"B. Nazer, R. Nowak","doi":"10.1109/GENSIPS.2010.5719680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops theoretical bounds on the number of required experiments to infer which genes are active in a particular biological process. The standard approach is to perform many experiments, each with a single gene suppressed or knocked down. However, certain effects are not revealed by single-gene knockouts and are only observed when two or more genes are suppressed simultaneously. Here, we propose a framework for identifying such interactions without resorting to an exhaustive pairwise search. We exploit the inherent sparsity of the problem that stems from the fact that very few gene pairs are likely to be active. We model the biological process by a multilinear function with unknown coefficients and develop a compressed sensing framework for inferring the coefficients. Our main result is that if at most S gene or gene pairs are active out of N total then approximately S2 log N measurements suffice to identify the significant active components.","PeriodicalId":388703,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Workshop on Genomic Signal Processing and Statistics (GENSIPS)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Workshop on Genomic Signal Processing and Statistics (GENSIPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GENSIPS.2010.5719680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper develops theoretical bounds on the number of required experiments to infer which genes are active in a particular biological process. The standard approach is to perform many experiments, each with a single gene suppressed or knocked down. However, certain effects are not revealed by single-gene knockouts and are only observed when two or more genes are suppressed simultaneously. Here, we propose a framework for identifying such interactions without resorting to an exhaustive pairwise search. We exploit the inherent sparsity of the problem that stems from the fact that very few gene pairs are likely to be active. We model the biological process by a multilinear function with unknown coefficients and develop a compressed sensing framework for inferring the coefficients. Our main result is that if at most S gene or gene pairs are active out of N total then approximately S2 log N measurements suffice to identify the significant active components.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多基因敲低实验的高效设计
本文发展了所需实验的数量的理论界限,以推断哪些基因在特定的生物过程中是活跃的。标准的方法是进行许多实验,每个实验都有一个基因被抑制或敲除。然而,单基因敲除不显示某些影响,只有在两个或更多基因同时被抑制时才会观察到。在这里,我们提出了一个框架来识别这种相互作用,而不诉诸穷尽的两两搜索。我们利用了这个问题固有的稀疏性,它源于很少有基因对可能是活跃的这一事实。我们通过一个具有未知系数的多线性函数来模拟生物过程,并开发了一个用于推断系数的压缩感知框架。我们的主要结果是,如果在N总中最多有S个基因或基因对是有活性的,那么大约S2 log N的测量就足以确定重要的活性成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Network propagation models for gene selection Subtype specific breast cancer event prediction Importance sampling method for efficient estimation of the probability of rare events in biochemical reaction systems Bayesian MMSE estimation of classification error and performance on real genomic data Pathway and network analysis probing epigenetic influences on chemosensitivity in ovarian cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1