Relational STE and theorem proving for formal verification of industrial circuit designs

J. O'Leary, R. Kaivola, T. Melham
{"title":"Relational STE and theorem proving for formal verification of industrial circuit designs","authors":"J. O'Leary, R. Kaivola, T. Melham","doi":"10.1109/FMCAD.2013.6679397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model checking by symbolic trajectory evaluation, orchestrated in a flexible functional-programming framework, is a well-established technology for correctness verification of industrial-scale circuit designs. Most verifications in this domain require decomposition into subproblems that symbolic trajectory evaluation can handle, and deductive theorem proving has long been proposed as a complement to symbolic trajectory evaluation to enable such compositional reasoning. This paper describes an approach to verification by symbolic simulation, called Relational STE, that raises verification properties to the purely logical level suitable for compositional reasoning in a theorem prover. We also introduce a new deductive theorem prover, called Goaled, that has been integrated into Intel's Forte verification framework for this purpose. We illustrate the effectiveness of this combination of technologies by describing a general framework, accessible to non-experts, that is widely used for verification and regression validation of integer multipliers at Intel.","PeriodicalId":346097,"journal":{"name":"2013 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2013.6679397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Model checking by symbolic trajectory evaluation, orchestrated in a flexible functional-programming framework, is a well-established technology for correctness verification of industrial-scale circuit designs. Most verifications in this domain require decomposition into subproblems that symbolic trajectory evaluation can handle, and deductive theorem proving has long been proposed as a complement to symbolic trajectory evaluation to enable such compositional reasoning. This paper describes an approach to verification by symbolic simulation, called Relational STE, that raises verification properties to the purely logical level suitable for compositional reasoning in a theorem prover. We also introduce a new deductive theorem prover, called Goaled, that has been integrated into Intel's Forte verification framework for this purpose. We illustrate the effectiveness of this combination of technologies by describing a general framework, accessible to non-experts, that is widely used for verification and regression validation of integer multipliers at Intel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业电路设计形式化验证的关系STE和定理证明
在灵活的功能编程框架中,通过符号轨迹评估进行模型检查是一种成熟的技术,用于验证工业规模电路设计的正确性。该领域的大多数验证都需要分解成符号轨迹评估可以处理的子问题,而演绎定理证明早就被提出作为符号轨迹评估的补充来实现这种组合推理。本文描述了一种通过符号模拟进行验证的方法,称为关系STE,它将验证属性提高到适合定理证明器中组合推理的纯逻辑级别。我们还引入了一个新的演绎定理证明器,称为目标,它已被集成到英特尔的Forte验证框架中。我们通过描述一个非专家可访问的通用框架来说明这种技术组合的有效性,该框架被广泛用于英特尔整数乘法器的验证和回归验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficient handling of obligation constraints in synthesis from omega-regular specifications Verifying global convergence for a digital phase-locked loop Relational STE and theorem proving for formal verification of industrial circuit designs Verifying multi-threaded software with impact Formal co-validation of low-level hardware/software interfaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1