Learning By Collaborative Teaching: An Engaging Multi-Party CoWriter Activity

L. E. Hamamsy, W. Johal, Thibault Asselborn, Jauwairia Nasir, P. Dillenbourg
{"title":"Learning By Collaborative Teaching: An Engaging Multi-Party CoWriter Activity","authors":"L. E. Hamamsy, W. Johal, Thibault Asselborn, Jauwairia Nasir, P. Dillenbourg","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the design of a novel and engaging collaborative learning activity for handwriting where a group of participants simultaneously tutor a Nao robot. This activity was intended to take advantage of both collaborative learning and the learning by teaching paradigm to improve children’s meta-cognition (perception of their own skills). Multiple engagement probes were integrated into the activity as a first step towards fostering long term interactions. As a lot of research targets social interactions, the goal here was to determine whether an engagement strategy focused on the task could be as, or more efficient than one focused on social interactions and participants’ introspection. To that effect, two engagement strategies were implemented. They differed in content but used the same multi-modal design in order to increase participants’ meta-cognitive reflection, once on the task and performances, and once on participants’ enjoyment and emotions. Both strategies were compared to a baseline by probing and assessing engagement at the individual and group level, along the behavioural, emotional and cognitive dimensions, in a between subject experiment with 12 groups of children. The experiments showed that the collaborative task pushed the children to adapt their manner of writing to the group, even though the adopted solution was not always correct. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the strategies in terms of behaviour on task (behavioural engagement), satisfaction (emotional engagement) or performance (cognitive engagement) as the group dynamics had a stronger impact on the outcome of the collaborative teaching task. Therefore, the task and social engagement strategies can be considered as efficient in the context of collaboration.","PeriodicalId":286478,"journal":{"name":"2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This paper presents the design of a novel and engaging collaborative learning activity for handwriting where a group of participants simultaneously tutor a Nao robot. This activity was intended to take advantage of both collaborative learning and the learning by teaching paradigm to improve children’s meta-cognition (perception of their own skills). Multiple engagement probes were integrated into the activity as a first step towards fostering long term interactions. As a lot of research targets social interactions, the goal here was to determine whether an engagement strategy focused on the task could be as, or more efficient than one focused on social interactions and participants’ introspection. To that effect, two engagement strategies were implemented. They differed in content but used the same multi-modal design in order to increase participants’ meta-cognitive reflection, once on the task and performances, and once on participants’ enjoyment and emotions. Both strategies were compared to a baseline by probing and assessing engagement at the individual and group level, along the behavioural, emotional and cognitive dimensions, in a between subject experiment with 12 groups of children. The experiments showed that the collaborative task pushed the children to adapt their manner of writing to the group, even though the adopted solution was not always correct. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the strategies in terms of behaviour on task (behavioural engagement), satisfaction (emotional engagement) or performance (cognitive engagement) as the group dynamics had a stronger impact on the outcome of the collaborative teaching task. Therefore, the task and social engagement strategies can be considered as efficient in the context of collaboration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过合作教学学习:参与多方共同写作活动
本文介绍了一种新颖的、引人入胜的手写协作学习活动的设计,其中一组参与者同时指导一个Nao机器人。该活动旨在利用合作学习和教中学习两种模式来提高儿童的元认知(对自己技能的感知)。作为促进长期互动的第一步,多个参与探针被整合到活动中。由于许多研究都以社交互动为目标,这里的目标是确定专注于任务的参与策略是否与专注于社交互动和参与者自省的策略一样有效,或者更有效。为此,实施了两项接触策略。他们在内容上有所不同,但使用了相同的多模态设计,以增加参与者的元认知反思,一次是对任务和表现的反思,一次是对参与者的享受和情绪的反思。在12组儿童的实验中,通过探索和评估个人和群体层面的参与度,以及行为、情感和认知维度,将这两种策略与基线进行比较。实验表明,协作任务促使孩子们调整他们的写作方式以适应小组,即使采用的解决方案并不总是正确的。此外,在任务行为(行为投入)、满意度(情感投入)或表现(认知投入)方面,不同策略之间没有显著差异,因为群体动力学对合作教学任务的结果有更强的影响。因此,任务和社会参与策略在协作的背景下可以被认为是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Descriptive and Emotive Labels to Explain Human Perception of Gait Styles on a Compass Walker in Variable Contexts Communicating with SanTO – the first Catholic robot Transferring Dexterous Surgical Skill Knowledge between Robots for Semi-autonomous Teleoperation Improving Robot Transparency: An Investigation With Mobile Augmented Reality Development and Applicability of a Cable-driven Wearable Adaptive Rehabilitation Suit (WeARS)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1