Protective effect of B.clasuii on sepsis

Varlık K Erel
{"title":"Protective effect of B.clasuii on sepsis","authors":"Varlık K Erel","doi":"10.4328/aemed.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DOI: 10.4328/AEMED.127 Received: 15.03.2018 Accepted: 24.03.2018 Published Online: 26.03.2018 Printed Online: 01.05.2018 J Ann Eu Med 2018;6(2): 20-3 Corresponding Author: Varlik K. Erel, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Aydın, Turkey. E-Mail: varlik.erel@gmail.com ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0539-661X Abstract Aim: Sepsis is a clinical problem that still has high mortality and morbidity despite advances in supportive care in intensive care. The study’s aim was to investigate the protective effect of Bacillus clausii, an important probiotic with a strengthening effect on the gastrointestinal barrier, on septicemia. Material and Method: Twenty-four rats were divided into three randomized and double-blind groups, as Group 1 (control group, n=8), Group 2 (sepsis group, n=8), and Group 3 (sepsis+probiotic group, n=8). Lipopolysaccharide extracted from serotypes (0111:B4) of Escherichia coli (E.coli ) was injected intraperitoneally to all group for sepsis model at a dose of 15 mg/kg and rats were sacrificed at 48 hours. Serum oxidant and antioxidant parameters were measured. Results: The C-Reactive Protein (CRP) value of Group 1 was significantly lower than Group 2 [CI:(-44.16)-(-28.52), p=0.000], whereas the CRP values of Group 3 were significantly lower than Group 2 [CI:(7.4)-(34.7), p=0.005]. MDA values were found to be significant between Groups 1 and 2, CI:(-0.3)-(-0.7), p=0.045. The thiol values of Group 2 were significantly lower than Group 1 [CI:(9)-(366), p=0.041], whereas the thiol (SH) values of Group 3 were significantly higher than those of Group 2 [CI:(-659)-(-98), p=0.016]. Discussion: B. clausii is one of a group of probiotics that is inexpensive and effective. Sepsis is still a high-risk clinical problem. Our study showed that B. clausii has a protective effect against sepsis.","PeriodicalId":129767,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Clinical and Analytical Medicine","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Clinical and Analytical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4328/aemed.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DOI: 10.4328/AEMED.127 Received: 15.03.2018 Accepted: 24.03.2018 Published Online: 26.03.2018 Printed Online: 01.05.2018 J Ann Eu Med 2018;6(2): 20-3 Corresponding Author: Varlik K. Erel, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Aydın, Turkey. E-Mail: varlik.erel@gmail.com ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0539-661X Abstract Aim: Sepsis is a clinical problem that still has high mortality and morbidity despite advances in supportive care in intensive care. The study’s aim was to investigate the protective effect of Bacillus clausii, an important probiotic with a strengthening effect on the gastrointestinal barrier, on septicemia. Material and Method: Twenty-four rats were divided into three randomized and double-blind groups, as Group 1 (control group, n=8), Group 2 (sepsis group, n=8), and Group 3 (sepsis+probiotic group, n=8). Lipopolysaccharide extracted from serotypes (0111:B4) of Escherichia coli (E.coli ) was injected intraperitoneally to all group for sepsis model at a dose of 15 mg/kg and rats were sacrificed at 48 hours. Serum oxidant and antioxidant parameters were measured. Results: The C-Reactive Protein (CRP) value of Group 1 was significantly lower than Group 2 [CI:(-44.16)-(-28.52), p=0.000], whereas the CRP values of Group 3 were significantly lower than Group 2 [CI:(7.4)-(34.7), p=0.005]. MDA values were found to be significant between Groups 1 and 2, CI:(-0.3)-(-0.7), p=0.045. The thiol values of Group 2 were significantly lower than Group 1 [CI:(9)-(366), p=0.041], whereas the thiol (SH) values of Group 3 were significantly higher than those of Group 2 [CI:(-659)-(-98), p=0.016]. Discussion: B. clausii is one of a group of probiotics that is inexpensive and effective. Sepsis is still a high-risk clinical problem. Our study showed that B. clausii has a protective effect against sepsis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克拉伊杆菌对败血症的保护作用
DOI: 10.4328 / AEMED.127J Ann Eu Med 2018;6(2): 20-3通讯作者:Varlik K. Erel, Adnan Menderes大学医学院麻醉与复苏学系,Aydın,土耳其。摘要目的:脓毒症是一个临床问题,尽管在重症监护室的支持治疗取得了进展,但仍有很高的死亡率和发病率。这项研究的目的是研究克氏芽孢杆菌对败血症的保护作用,克氏芽孢杆菌是一种重要的益生菌,对胃肠道屏障有增强作用。材料与方法:将24只大鼠随机分为3个双盲组:1组(对照组,n=8)、2组(脓毒症组,n=8)、3组(脓毒症+益生菌组,n=8)。从大肠杆菌(E.coli)血清型(0111:B4)中提取脂多糖,以15 mg/kg的剂量腹腔注射至脓毒症模型各组,48 h处死大鼠。测定血清氧化和抗氧化指标。结果:1组c -反应蛋白(CRP)值显著低于2组[CI:(-44.16)-(-28.52), p=0.000], 3组CRP值显著低于2组[CI:(7.4)-(34.7), p=0.005]。各组间MDA值差异有统计学意义,CI:(-0.3)-(-0.7), p=0.045。第2组的硫醇值显著低于第1组[CI:(9)-(366), p=0.041],第3组的硫醇(SH)值显著高于第2组[CI:(-659)-(-98), p=0.016]。讨论:克劳梭菌是一种廉价而有效的益生菌。脓毒症仍然是一个高风险的临床问题。我们的研究表明克劳梭菌对脓毒症有保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Protective effect of B.clasuii on sepsis Rhomboid excision and limberg flap reconstruction for pilonidal disease Endobronchial foreign body aspirations causing chronic cough and dyspnea Laparoscopic colorectal surgery outcomes in our first 65 case comparing with literature Simultaneous combined spinal epidural anesthesia technique without catheter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1