{"title":"Simultaneous combined spinal epidural anesthesia technique without catheter","authors":"Varlık K Erel","doi":"10.4328/AEMED.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DOI: 10.4328/AEMED.128 Received: 16.03.2018 Accepted: 28.03.2018 Published Online: 04.02.2018 Printed Online: 01.05.2018 J Ann Eu Med 2018;6(2): 24-7 Corresponding Author: Varlik K. Erel, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Aydin, Turkey. E-Mail: varlik.erel@gmail.com ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0539-661X Abstract Aims: The extension of spinal anesthesia by extradural injection has been identified as a modification of the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Epidural volume extension (EVE) is a rescue strategy that can raise the level of insufficient post-spinal sensory block. Material and Method: After approval of Adnan Menderes University Ethics Committee (Decision 2016/834/37), the data of 455 patients who had undergone insufficient simultaneous combined spinal epidural without catheter between 2010 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed in terms of ASA scores; demographic and hemodynamic data; surgery type; preoperative and postoperative sensory and motor block levels; operation onset times after anesthesia; need for peroperative additional anesthesia, vasopressor (ephedrine) and atropine; and postoperative pain onset times. Results: Of the 455 patients, there were two groups. In the first group, there were 238 patients who had undergone cesarean section and in the second group there were 217 patients who had undergone surgery for inguinal hernia. There was no mortality and morbidity in any group. There was a statistically significant decrease in heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures during the peroperative period in both groups (p<0.05). Discussion: The simultaneous combined spinal-epidural technique (sCSEA) without catheter may be considered as an alternative to conventional methods for appropriate surgeries. It can be safely used with local anesthetic combinations instead of saline for EVE. The advantages and disadvantages of EVE compared to the conventional method should be demonstrated with clinical randomized studies.","PeriodicalId":129767,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Clinical and Analytical Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Clinical and Analytical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4328/AEMED.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
DOI: 10.4328/AEMED.128 Received: 16.03.2018 Accepted: 28.03.2018 Published Online: 04.02.2018 Printed Online: 01.05.2018 J Ann Eu Med 2018;6(2): 24-7 Corresponding Author: Varlik K. Erel, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Aydin, Turkey. E-Mail: varlik.erel@gmail.com ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0539-661X Abstract Aims: The extension of spinal anesthesia by extradural injection has been identified as a modification of the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Epidural volume extension (EVE) is a rescue strategy that can raise the level of insufficient post-spinal sensory block. Material and Method: After approval of Adnan Menderes University Ethics Committee (Decision 2016/834/37), the data of 455 patients who had undergone insufficient simultaneous combined spinal epidural without catheter between 2010 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed in terms of ASA scores; demographic and hemodynamic data; surgery type; preoperative and postoperative sensory and motor block levels; operation onset times after anesthesia; need for peroperative additional anesthesia, vasopressor (ephedrine) and atropine; and postoperative pain onset times. Results: Of the 455 patients, there were two groups. In the first group, there were 238 patients who had undergone cesarean section and in the second group there were 217 patients who had undergone surgery for inguinal hernia. There was no mortality and morbidity in any group. There was a statistically significant decrease in heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures during the peroperative period in both groups (p<0.05). Discussion: The simultaneous combined spinal-epidural technique (sCSEA) without catheter may be considered as an alternative to conventional methods for appropriate surgeries. It can be safely used with local anesthetic combinations instead of saline for EVE. The advantages and disadvantages of EVE compared to the conventional method should be demonstrated with clinical randomized studies.
DOI: 10.4328 / AEMED.128收稿日期:16.03.2018收稿日期:28.03.2018出版日期:04.02.2018印刷日期:01.05.2018 J Ann Eu Med 2018;6(2): 24-7通讯作者:Varlik K. Erel,土耳其Adnan Menderes大学医学院麻醉与复苏系。摘要目的:硬膜外注射延长脊髓麻醉已被确定为脊髓-硬膜外联合麻醉的一种改进。硬膜外容量扩展(EVE)是一种可以提高脊髓后感觉阻滞不足程度的抢救策略。材料与方法:经Adnan Menderes大学伦理委员会批准(Decision 2016/834/37),对2010 - 2016年间455例同时行硬膜外联合无导管治疗不足患者的ASA评分进行回顾性分析;人口统计和血流动力学数据;手术类型;术前和术后感觉和运动阻滞水平;麻醉后手术开始次数;术中需要额外麻醉,血管加压素(麻黄碱)和阿托品;术后疼痛发作时间。结果:455例患者分为两组。第一组238例患者行剖宫产术,第二组217例患者行腹股沟疝手术。各组无死亡率和发病率。两组患者术中心率、收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压均显著降低(p<0.05)。讨论:无导管同时联合脊髓-硬膜外技术(sCSEA)可作为常规手术的替代方法。它可以安全地与局部麻醉剂组合使用,而不是生理盐水用于EVE。与传统方法相比,EVE的优点和缺点应该通过临床随机研究来证明。