Prioritising National Competitiveness over Support for Democracy? Finnish Media Policy in the 21st Century

M. Ala-Fossi, Mikko Grönlund, Heikki Hellman, Katja Lehtisaari, K. Karppinen, H. Nieminen
{"title":"Prioritising National Competitiveness over Support for Democracy? Finnish Media Policy in the 21st Century","authors":"M. Ala-Fossi, Mikko Grönlund, Heikki Hellman, Katja Lehtisaari, K. Karppinen, H. Nieminen","doi":"10.33067/se.4.2022.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ever since the launch of the World Press Freedom Index almost 20 years ago, Finland has always been among the top fi ve countries of that index. According to the annual Reuters Digital News reports, Finnish people also have the highest level of trust in the news media and one of the highest levels of press readership in the EU. Most of the media companies are doing quite well, while Google and Facebook have a much less dominant role in the advertising market than elsewhere in Europe. In this context, you might expect Finland to have a comprehensive and visionary media and communications policy to support democracy. However, our meta-study of Finnish media and communications policy based on two recent reportsto the Ministry of Transport and Communications, other earlier studies, along with official documents as well as statistical data suggests that is not the case. Our analysis shows that most decisions have been pragmatic ad hoc solutions serving economic interests rather than any specific media and communication policy goals. A closer examination also proves that Finland does not fit into the Nordic Media Welfare State model either, despite a long, shared history and cultural ties.","PeriodicalId":365693,"journal":{"name":"Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs","volume":"417 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33067/se.4.2022.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ever since the launch of the World Press Freedom Index almost 20 years ago, Finland has always been among the top fi ve countries of that index. According to the annual Reuters Digital News reports, Finnish people also have the highest level of trust in the news media and one of the highest levels of press readership in the EU. Most of the media companies are doing quite well, while Google and Facebook have a much less dominant role in the advertising market than elsewhere in Europe. In this context, you might expect Finland to have a comprehensive and visionary media and communications policy to support democracy. However, our meta-study of Finnish media and communications policy based on two recent reportsto the Ministry of Transport and Communications, other earlier studies, along with official documents as well as statistical data suggests that is not the case. Our analysis shows that most decisions have been pragmatic ad hoc solutions serving economic interests rather than any specific media and communication policy goals. A closer examination also proves that Finland does not fit into the Nordic Media Welfare State model either, despite a long, shared history and cultural ties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比起支持民主,国家竞争力更重要?21世纪的芬兰媒体政策
自近20年前发布世界新闻自由指数以来,芬兰一直位列该指数的前五名。根据路透社数字新闻的年度报告,芬兰人民对新闻媒体的信任度也是最高的,也是欧盟中新闻读者人数最高的国家之一。大多数媒体公司都做得很好,而谷歌和Facebook在广告市场上的主导地位远不如欧洲其他地方。在这种情况下,你可能会期望芬兰有一个全面和有远见的媒体和通讯政策来支持民主。然而,我们对芬兰媒体和传播政策的元研究基于交通和通信部最近的两份报告,其他早期研究,以及官方文件和统计数据表明,情况并非如此。我们的分析表明,大多数决定都是务实的临时解决方案,服务于经济利益,而不是任何特定的媒体和传播政策目标。更仔细的研究也证明,芬兰也不适合北欧媒体福利国家模式,尽管两国有着悠久的共同历史和文化纽带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Rule of Law Crisis in Poland and “Normative Power EU” Thesis: Challenges and Implications Opposition Discourse About National Recovery and Resilience Plans. Poland and Hungary Compared Is the Spanish Army’s Experimental Brigade 2035 a Result of Civil-military Relations? A Historical Overview (1923–2021) In-betweenness and Migration Interdependence: Lessons from Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine War and Food (In)security – A Lesson from the Russian-Ukrainian Confl ict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1