Comparison of two text entry methods on interactive TV

Adam J. Sporka, Ondrej Polácek, P. Slavík
{"title":"Comparison of two text entry methods on interactive TV","authors":"Adam J. Sporka, Ondrej Polácek, P. Slavík","doi":"10.1145/2325616.2325627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a study with 18 participants on two text input methods for use with interactive television, The Numpad Typer (TNT) and TwiceTap. Both methods were designed for use with a common infra-red remote control. Each character is entered using two keystrokes. After one hour and forty minutes of practice, split into 5 sessions, the participants were able to type faster than 9 words per minute. While the performance of both methods was similar, the TwiceTap required a smaller number of keystrokes per character, was less prone to errors, and was found to be more comfortable by the participants. Over time, the use of frequent n-grams in TwiceTap was reinforced while the use of infrequent n-grams was suppressed.","PeriodicalId":166630,"journal":{"name":"European Conference on Interactive TV","volume":"190 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference on Interactive TV","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This paper describes a study with 18 participants on two text input methods for use with interactive television, The Numpad Typer (TNT) and TwiceTap. Both methods were designed for use with a common infra-red remote control. Each character is entered using two keystrokes. After one hour and forty minutes of practice, split into 5 sessions, the participants were able to type faster than 9 words per minute. While the performance of both methods was similar, the TwiceTap required a smaller number of keystrokes per character, was less prone to errors, and was found to be more comfortable by the participants. Over time, the use of frequent n-grams in TwiceTap was reinforced while the use of infrequent n-grams was suppressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交互式电视上两种文本输入方法的比较
本文描述了一项研究,18名参与者对两种文本输入法的使用与互动电视,Numpad Typer (TNT)和TwiceTap。这两种方法都被设计为使用一个共同的红外遥控器。每个字符使用两次按键输入。经过1小时40分钟的练习,分成5个阶段,参与者每分钟的打字速度超过9个单词。虽然这两种方法的性能相似,但TwiceTap每个字符需要的按键次数更少,更不容易出错,而且参与者发现使用起来更舒服。随着时间的推移,TwiceTap中频繁n-gram的使用得到加强,而不频繁n-gram的使用受到抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A virtual camera controlling method using multi-touch gestures for capturing free-viewpoint video SoundsLike: movies soundtrack browsing and labeling based on relevance feedback and gamification Out of the box selection and application of UX evaluation methods and practical cases Live-streaming changes the (video) game 1st International workshop on interactive content consumption at euroITV 2013
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1