Dementia and the Politics of Memory in Fiction. From the Condition as Narrative Experiment to the Patient as Plot Device

M. Zimmermann
{"title":"Dementia and the Politics of Memory in Fiction. From the Condition as Narrative Experiment to the Patient as Plot Device","authors":"M. Zimmermann","doi":"10.1515/9783110713626-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay historically situates dementia fiction of the early 2000s that features Alzheimer’s disease or a similar type of dementia in the context of the Second World War and the Holocaust. It will delineate shifts that have occurred in how dementia is deployed in fiction that negotiates the various crimes committed and traumas predominantly caused by Nazi Germany. To do this, it will focus on the period from the 1980s onwards, commonly referred to as “Alzheimerisation” (Adelman 1995), when literary writing first employed the term “Alzheimer’s disease.” The period between 1980 and today is not distant enough to offer truly historicist conclusions. But to my mind, we can distinguish different phases of dementia literary writing (including significant periods of overlap), especially regarding how memory and forgetting have been explored and deployed in bestselling dementia fiction. I would distinguish: (i) literary fiction of the 1980s developed during what Jens Brockmeier (2015) refers to as the “memory boom” and Andreas Huyssen (2003, 4) sees as marked by an “explosion of memory discourses”; (ii) literary lifewriting by dementia caregivers of the 1990s as part of the continuation of the memory boom period; and (iii) bestselling literary fiction of the early 2000s. This essay brings a fictional text from the 1980s into conversation with several titles of the new century (for reflections on literary life-writing, I point to the contributions by Kristina Lucenko, Nina Schmidt and Dana Walrath in this volume). I take Debra Dean’s bestseller The Madonnas of Leningrad (2006) and Alice LaPlante’s acclaimed Turn of Mind (2011) as my present-day examples and read them against J. Bernlef’s bestselling novel Out of Mind, first published in","PeriodicalId":293497,"journal":{"name":"The Politics of Dementia","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Politics of Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110713626-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This essay historically situates dementia fiction of the early 2000s that features Alzheimer’s disease or a similar type of dementia in the context of the Second World War and the Holocaust. It will delineate shifts that have occurred in how dementia is deployed in fiction that negotiates the various crimes committed and traumas predominantly caused by Nazi Germany. To do this, it will focus on the period from the 1980s onwards, commonly referred to as “Alzheimerisation” (Adelman 1995), when literary writing first employed the term “Alzheimer’s disease.” The period between 1980 and today is not distant enough to offer truly historicist conclusions. But to my mind, we can distinguish different phases of dementia literary writing (including significant periods of overlap), especially regarding how memory and forgetting have been explored and deployed in bestselling dementia fiction. I would distinguish: (i) literary fiction of the 1980s developed during what Jens Brockmeier (2015) refers to as the “memory boom” and Andreas Huyssen (2003, 4) sees as marked by an “explosion of memory discourses”; (ii) literary lifewriting by dementia caregivers of the 1990s as part of the continuation of the memory boom period; and (iii) bestselling literary fiction of the early 2000s. This essay brings a fictional text from the 1980s into conversation with several titles of the new century (for reflections on literary life-writing, I point to the contributions by Kristina Lucenko, Nina Schmidt and Dana Walrath in this volume). I take Debra Dean’s bestseller The Madonnas of Leningrad (2006) and Alice LaPlante’s acclaimed Turn of Mind (2011) as my present-day examples and read them against J. Bernlef’s bestselling novel Out of Mind, first published in
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆和小说中的记忆政治。从作为叙事实验的条件到作为情节工具的病人
这篇文章将21世纪初的痴呆症小说历史地置于第二次世界大战和大屠杀的背景下,这些小说以阿尔茨海默病或类似类型的痴呆症为特征。它将描述痴呆症在小说中如何被部署的变化,这些小说讨论了纳粹德国主要造成的各种罪行和创伤。为了做到这一点,它将把重点放在从20世纪80年代开始的时期,通常被称为“阿尔茨海默病”(Adelman 1995),当时文学写作首次使用了“阿尔茨海默病”一词。1980年至今的这段时间还不足以得出真正的历史定论。但在我看来,我们可以区分痴呆症文学写作的不同阶段(包括重要的重叠时期),特别是在畅销的痴呆症小说中如何探索和运用记忆和遗忘。我将区分:(I) 20世纪80年代的文学小说是在Jens Brockmeier(2015)所称的“记忆热潮”和Andreas Huyssen(2003, 4)所认为的以“记忆话语爆炸”为标志的时期发展起来的;(ii) 20世纪90年代痴呆症护理人员的文学生活写作,作为记忆繁荣时期延续的一部分;(三)21世纪初最畅销的文学小说。这篇文章将20世纪80年代的虚构文本与新世纪的几个标题进行了对话(为了对文学生活写作的反思,我指出了克里斯蒂娜·卢申科、尼娜·施密特和达纳·沃尔拉斯在本卷中的贡献)。我以黛布拉·迪恩的畅销书《列宁格勒的圣母》(2006年)和爱丽丝·拉普兰特广受好评的《心灵的转向》(2011年)为例,将它们与j·伯恩莱夫的畅销小说《心灵之外》(1986年首次出版)进行对比
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strange Bodies. Dementia and Legacies of Colonialism in Fiona McFarlane’s The Night Guest Homo Sacer / Homo Demens. The Epistemology of Dementia in Contemporary Literature and Theory Index Journeying into Uncertainty: Representations of Memory Loss in Kindertransport Fiction and Drama Dementia and the Politics of Memory in Fiction. From the Condition as Narrative Experiment to the Patient as Plot Device
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1