Not at All Costs: Frontier Modernization Schemes and Ethnic Minority Livelihood Debates in the Sino-Vietnamese Borderlands

J. Rousseau, S. Turner
{"title":"Not at All Costs: Frontier Modernization Schemes and Ethnic Minority Livelihood Debates in the Sino-Vietnamese Borderlands","authors":"J. Rousseau, S. Turner","doi":"10.5749/VERGSTUDGLOBASIA.4.1.0133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The Chinese and Vietnamese states are encouraging or endorsing numerous schemes to “modernize” what they deem to be the physical and cultural frontiers of their political territories. Proceeding at a rapid pace across the Sino-Vietnamese borderlands, frontier projects frequently enclose resources at the core of ethnic minority livelihoods for the sake of capitalist expansion, while promoting specific visions of what appropriate, “civilized” frontier livelihoods should be. Though researchers are beginning to direct their attention to such individual transformations, we still know very little about their similarities and differences across space. In this article, we analyze four frontier schemes strongly encouraged by either the Chinese or Vietnamese state: hydropower and house renovation projects directly impacting ethnic minority Handai communities in China's Yunnan Province and state-led agricultural and marketplace restructuring just across the border in northern Vietnam, with important consequences for minority Hmong households. Drawing on the emic, subjective perspectives of ethnic minority populations in these contact zones, we examine and compare how they employ culturally informed livelihood criteria and decision-making processes to accept, rework, or, in some cases, carefully resist the consequences of such frontier schemes.","PeriodicalId":263014,"journal":{"name":"Verge: Studies in Global Asias","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verge: Studies in Global Asias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/VERGSTUDGLOBASIA.4.1.0133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract:The Chinese and Vietnamese states are encouraging or endorsing numerous schemes to “modernize” what they deem to be the physical and cultural frontiers of their political territories. Proceeding at a rapid pace across the Sino-Vietnamese borderlands, frontier projects frequently enclose resources at the core of ethnic minority livelihoods for the sake of capitalist expansion, while promoting specific visions of what appropriate, “civilized” frontier livelihoods should be. Though researchers are beginning to direct their attention to such individual transformations, we still know very little about their similarities and differences across space. In this article, we analyze four frontier schemes strongly encouraged by either the Chinese or Vietnamese state: hydropower and house renovation projects directly impacting ethnic minority Handai communities in China's Yunnan Province and state-led agricultural and marketplace restructuring just across the border in northern Vietnam, with important consequences for minority Hmong households. Drawing on the emic, subjective perspectives of ethnic minority populations in these contact zones, we examine and compare how they employ culturally informed livelihood criteria and decision-making processes to accept, rework, or, in some cases, carefully resist the consequences of such frontier schemes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不惜一切代价:中越边境地区边疆现代化计划与少数民族生计之争
摘要:中国和越南政府正在鼓励或支持许多计划,以“现代化”他们认为是其政治领土的物理和文化边界。在中越边境地区,边境项目以快速的速度进行,为了资本主义的扩张,经常将少数民族生计的核心资源封闭起来,同时促进了适当的、“文明的”边境生计的具体愿景。尽管研究人员开始将注意力转向这种个体的转变,但我们对它们在空间上的异同仍然知之甚少。在本文中,我们分析了中国和越南政府强烈鼓励的四个边境项目:直接影响中国云南省汉族少数民族社区的水电和房屋改造项目,以及国家主导的越南北部农业和市场重组,这些项目对少数民族苗族家庭产生了重要影响。根据这些接触区内少数民族人口的主观观点,我们研究和比较了他们如何采用文化知情的生计标准和决策过程来接受、返工,或者在某些情况下小心翼翼地抵制这些边境计划的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Economies of Brown Salvation: Impoverishment, Assimilationist Imaginaries, and Dominant-Caste Capture The Possibilities and Limits of Brown/ness(es) Indenture, Iteration: Race and the Aesthetics of Contract Labor Making Brown/ness(es): Aesthetics in the Everyday Feeling Brown, Thinking Black: Translating the Black Panther from Lowndes to Bombay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1