Application of Importance Performance Analysis Method in Measuring the Level of Community Satisfaction with the Quality of Service of the Minasa Upa Public Health Center

Resti Wulandari Muchlis, A. Saleh, Muhammad Fachry Hafid
{"title":"Application of Importance Performance Analysis Method in Measuring the Level of Community Satisfaction with the Quality of Service of the Minasa Upa Public Health Center","authors":"Resti Wulandari Muchlis, A. Saleh, Muhammad Fachry Hafid","doi":"10.56953/jsiems.v1i1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure the level of patient satisfaction with service quality at the Minasa Upa Health Center. \nDesign/methodology/approach: This study uses the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) method to measure community satisfaction with service quality. Data was obtained by distributing questionnaires. Five dimensions are measured: tangible variables, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. \nFindings: The results of this study indicate that the quality of service at the Minasa Upa Public Health Center in terms of five dimensions results in a perception value below the expected value. These results suggest that patient satisfaction with services at the Minasa Upa Health Center in Makassar city still needs to be fulfilled. \nResearch limitations/implications: This research was fieldwork at the Minasa Upa Public Health Center. The respondents in this study were people who had visited or received treatment at the Minasa Upa Public Health Center, as many as 100. \nOriginality/value: Public Health Center describes a public service engaged in health services that has an essential role in the National Health System. Public Health Center is a health service provider organization that exists in all regions. The quality of service at the Minasa Upa Public Health Center is still not good, as evidenced by the perceived value, which is still below the expected value and has led to decreased public confidence in seeking treatment at the health center. So, this can affect the decline in health levels in the community. In addition to this, facilities and infrastructure factors still do not satisfy service users.","PeriodicalId":424225,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainability Industrial Engineering and Management System","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainability Industrial Engineering and Management System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56953/jsiems.v1i1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure the level of patient satisfaction with service quality at the Minasa Upa Health Center. Design/methodology/approach: This study uses the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) method to measure community satisfaction with service quality. Data was obtained by distributing questionnaires. Five dimensions are measured: tangible variables, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. Findings: The results of this study indicate that the quality of service at the Minasa Upa Public Health Center in terms of five dimensions results in a perception value below the expected value. These results suggest that patient satisfaction with services at the Minasa Upa Health Center in Makassar city still needs to be fulfilled. Research limitations/implications: This research was fieldwork at the Minasa Upa Public Health Center. The respondents in this study were people who had visited or received treatment at the Minasa Upa Public Health Center, as many as 100. Originality/value: Public Health Center describes a public service engaged in health services that has an essential role in the National Health System. Public Health Center is a health service provider organization that exists in all regions. The quality of service at the Minasa Upa Public Health Center is still not good, as evidenced by the perceived value, which is still below the expected value and has led to decreased public confidence in seeking treatment at the health center. So, this can affect the decline in health levels in the community. In addition to this, facilities and infrastructure factors still do not satisfy service users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重要性绩效分析法在衡量Minasa Upa公共卫生中心服务质量的社区满意度中的应用
目的:本研究的目的是测量米纳萨乌帕健康中心的病人对服务质量的满意度。设计/方法/方法:本研究采用重要性绩效分析(IPA)方法来衡量社区对服务质量的满意度。数据是通过发放问卷获得的。测量了五个维度:有形变量、可靠性、响应性、保证和同理心。研究结果:本研究结果表明,在五个维度上,Minasa Upa公共卫生中心的服务质量导致感知值低于期望值。这些结果表明,患者对望加锡市Minasa Upa保健中心服务的满意度仍有待提高。研究局限性/意义:本研究是在Minasa Upa公共卫生中心进行的实地调查。本研究的受访者是在Minasa Upa公共卫生中心访问或接受治疗的人,多达100人。原创性/价值:公共卫生中心描述从事卫生服务的公共服务,在国家卫生系统中发挥重要作用。公共卫生中心是一个存在于所有地区的卫生服务提供者组织。米纳萨乌帕公共卫生中心的服务质量仍然不好,这一点可以从感知价值看出,它仍然低于预期价值,并导致公众对在该卫生中心寻求治疗的信心下降。因此,这可能会影响社区健康水平的下降。除此之外,设施和基础设施因素仍然不能满足服务用户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Machine Maintenance Planning Using the Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) Method at PT Perkebunan Nusantara XIV Camming Sugar Factory in Bone Regency Analysis of the Influence of Mental Workload on Employee Performance with the Subjective Workload Assessment Technique (SWAT) Method at PT. Bumi Jasa Utama (Kalla Group) Analysis of Coffee Product Packaging Development Based on Consumer Preferences Using the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Method of Budi UMKM in Luwu Regency Application of Importance Performance Analysis Method in Measuring the Level of Community Satisfaction with the Quality of Service of the Minasa Upa Public Health Center DESIGN OF ONLINE-BASED STUDY PROGRAM DETERMINATION APPLICATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1