Black Feminism Reimagined: After Intersectionality

Eliza de Souza Silva Araújo
{"title":"Black Feminism Reimagined: After Intersectionality","authors":"Eliza de Souza Silva Araújo","doi":"10.22478/ufpb.1807-8214.2019v28n1.49322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In her Black feminism reimagined, Jennifer C. Nash engages with the notion of intersectionality, central for the discussions of black feminism, in an affective and also critical way. The theoretician’s standpoint is located in her experience and readings as an academic, therefore, a substantial part of the discussion is centered around academic practices and their most recent connections with intersectionality. Understanding the university as a place that was not historically a space of support for intellectual knowledge production of black women, Nash ponders about practices which remain colonial in such locations: the use of intersectionality for good corporate image, the peripheral space reserved for theoreticians who engage with this type of analytics, the fetishization of black women, which contributes to systemic violence. Nash believes one can read and think intersectionality from a perspective which requires commitment and care, where there is space and demand for dialogue and reinvention, inspired by social and global changes already taking place and amplifying feminist perfections of black women and women of color.","PeriodicalId":438381,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ártemis","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"89","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ártemis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1807-8214.2019v28n1.49322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 89

Abstract

In her Black feminism reimagined, Jennifer C. Nash engages with the notion of intersectionality, central for the discussions of black feminism, in an affective and also critical way. The theoretician’s standpoint is located in her experience and readings as an academic, therefore, a substantial part of the discussion is centered around academic practices and their most recent connections with intersectionality. Understanding the university as a place that was not historically a space of support for intellectual knowledge production of black women, Nash ponders about practices which remain colonial in such locations: the use of intersectionality for good corporate image, the peripheral space reserved for theoreticians who engage with this type of analytics, the fetishization of black women, which contributes to systemic violence. Nash believes one can read and think intersectionality from a perspective which requires commitment and care, where there is space and demand for dialogue and reinvention, inspired by social and global changes already taking place and amplifying feminist perfections of black women and women of color.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑人女权主义的重新想象:在交叉性之后
在她重新构想的黑人女权主义中,詹妮弗·c·纳什以一种情感和批判的方式,探讨了交叉性的概念,这是黑人女权主义讨论的核心。理论家的立场是基于她作为学者的经验和阅读,因此,讨论的很大一部分是围绕学术实践及其与交叉性的最新联系展开的。纳什认为大学在历史上并不是一个支持黑人女性知识生产的地方,他思考了在这样的地方仍然存在殖民主义的做法:利用交叉性来获得良好的企业形象,为从事这种分析的理论家保留的外围空间,对黑人女性的崇拜,这导致了系统性暴力。纳什认为,人们可以从一个需要承诺和关怀的角度来解读和思考交叉性,那里有对话和重塑的空间和需求,受到已经发生的社会和全球变化的启发,放大了黑人女性和有色人种女性的女权主义完美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lilith em (per)cursos entre o ontem e o hoje A maternidade política em Hibisco Roxo, de Chimamanda Adichie Apresentação do dossiê A homofobia contra o professor “primário” do sexo masculino Os efeitos do binarismo de gênero nas estruturas cognitivas e na construção do pensamento social dos filhos da injúria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1