On subjectivity in focal engineering

G. Moriarty, Y. Julliard
{"title":"On subjectivity in focal engineering","authors":"G. Moriarty, Y. Julliard","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS.2001.937736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of focal engineering is discussed as a means of taking institutional care for the impact of engineering technologies on the lifeworld. The individual focal engineer is presented as moving into the intersubjective conversation of the lifeworld from out of her/his authentic subjectivity. The engineering enterprise is considered as a contextual phenomenon, including three contextual layers: lifeworld containing the realm of systems, systems containing the realm of technological systems, and technological systems containing the realm of engineering. With increasing technical development, the lifeworld is more and more colonized by systems, especially the technological subsystem. These systems have a broad influence on the lifeworld, as criteria of these subsystems, e.g. efficiency and productivity, seem to dominate everyday life. The colonization process is largely done without rational oversight and seems to indicate a technological determinism. Problems arise from this process. As technological values tend to dictate more and more the shape of the lifeworld, human freedom will be more and more limited. The danger of a dehumanized lifeworld appears. Engineers are largely involved in the process, as technological design is a basic goal of the discipline. The main question is, how should technological design be done in order to be appropriate to the boundary condition of maintaining freedoms in an authentically humanized lifeworld? This is the place of focal engineering.","PeriodicalId":394055,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Symposium on Technology and Society","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Symposium on Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2001.937736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The concept of focal engineering is discussed as a means of taking institutional care for the impact of engineering technologies on the lifeworld. The individual focal engineer is presented as moving into the intersubjective conversation of the lifeworld from out of her/his authentic subjectivity. The engineering enterprise is considered as a contextual phenomenon, including three contextual layers: lifeworld containing the realm of systems, systems containing the realm of technological systems, and technological systems containing the realm of engineering. With increasing technical development, the lifeworld is more and more colonized by systems, especially the technological subsystem. These systems have a broad influence on the lifeworld, as criteria of these subsystems, e.g. efficiency and productivity, seem to dominate everyday life. The colonization process is largely done without rational oversight and seems to indicate a technological determinism. Problems arise from this process. As technological values tend to dictate more and more the shape of the lifeworld, human freedom will be more and more limited. The danger of a dehumanized lifeworld appears. Engineers are largely involved in the process, as technological design is a basic goal of the discipline. The main question is, how should technological design be done in order to be appropriate to the boundary condition of maintaining freedoms in an authentically humanized lifeworld? This is the place of focal engineering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论焦点工程的主体性
焦点工程的概念是作为一种对工程技术对生活世界的影响采取制度关怀的手段来讨论的。个人焦点工程师被呈现为从她/他的真实主体性中进入生活世界的主体间对话。工程企业被认为是一种语境现象,包括三个语境层:包含系统领域的生活世界,包含技术系统领域的系统,以及包含工程领域的技术系统。随着技术的不断发展,生活世界越来越被系统,尤其是技术子系统所殖民。这些系统对生活世界有着广泛的影响,因为这些子系统的标准,例如效率和生产力,似乎主导着日常生活。殖民过程在很大程度上是在没有理性监督的情况下完成的,似乎表明了一种技术决定论。在这个过程中出现了问题。随着技术价值越来越倾向于决定生活世界的形态,人类的自由将越来越受到限制。一个非人化的生活世界的危险出现了。工程师在很大程度上参与了这个过程,因为技术设计是该学科的基本目标。主要的问题是,为了在真正人性化的生活世界中保持自由的边界条件,技术设计应该如何进行?这是重点工程的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethics, law and technology: a case study in computer-mediated communication A conceptual framework for teaching Internet ethics Humanities and social sciences in engineering education-postwar to postmodern and beyond On subjectivity in focal engineering What is the key to globalisation? [social aspects of automation]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1