Triangulating Public Meaning: Corpus Linguistics, Immersion, and the Constitutional Record

Lawrence B. Solum
{"title":"Triangulating Public Meaning: Corpus Linguistics, Immersion, and the Constitutional Record","authors":"Lawrence B. Solum","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3019494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Essay contributes to the development of an originalist methodology by making the case for an approach that employs three distinct methods, each of which serves as a basis for confirming or questioning the results reached by the other two. This approach will be called the Method of Triangulation. The three component techniques are as follows: \n(1) The Method of Corpus Linguistics: The method of corpus linguistics employs large-scale data sets (corpora) that provide evidence of linguistic practice. \n(2) The Originalist Method of Immersion: The method of immersion requires researchers to immerse themselves in the linguistic and conceptual world of the authors and readers of the constitutional provision being studied. \n(3) The Method of Studying the Constitutional Record: The method of studying the record framing, ratification, and implementation requires the researcher to examine the drafting process, including sources upon which the drafters relied, debates during the drafting and ratification process, and the early history of implementation of the constitutional provision. \nThese three methods each provide different inputs into the process of constitutional interpretation and construction. Because each method can be checked against the others, the combination of the three methods results in what can be called \"triangulation.\"","PeriodicalId":142428,"journal":{"name":"BYU Law Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BYU Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3019494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This Essay contributes to the development of an originalist methodology by making the case for an approach that employs three distinct methods, each of which serves as a basis for confirming or questioning the results reached by the other two. This approach will be called the Method of Triangulation. The three component techniques are as follows: (1) The Method of Corpus Linguistics: The method of corpus linguistics employs large-scale data sets (corpora) that provide evidence of linguistic practice. (2) The Originalist Method of Immersion: The method of immersion requires researchers to immerse themselves in the linguistic and conceptual world of the authors and readers of the constitutional provision being studied. (3) The Method of Studying the Constitutional Record: The method of studying the record framing, ratification, and implementation requires the researcher to examine the drafting process, including sources upon which the drafters relied, debates during the drafting and ratification process, and the early history of implementation of the constitutional provision. These three methods each provide different inputs into the process of constitutional interpretation and construction. Because each method can be checked against the others, the combination of the three methods results in what can be called "triangulation."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三角化公共意义:语料库语言学、浸入式和宪法记录
本文通过提出一种采用三种不同方法的方法,每一种方法都作为确认或质疑其他两种方法得出的结果的基础,为原旨主义方法论的发展做出了贡献。这种方法将被称为三角测量法。三个组成部分的技术如下:(1)语料库语言学方法:语料库语言学方法使用大规模的数据集(语料库)提供语言实践的证据。(2)原旨主义沉浸法:沉浸法要求研究人员将自己沉浸在所研究的宪法条款的作者和读者的语言和概念世界中。(3)研究宪法记录的方法:研究记录的制定、批准和实施的方法要求研究人员审查起草过程,包括起草者所依赖的来源、起草和批准过程中的辩论以及宪法条款实施的早期历史。这三种方法分别为宪法解释和建构提供了不同的输入。因为每种方法都可以与其他方法相比较,所以这三种方法的组合可以产生所谓的“三角测量”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gay Rights, Religious Liberty, and the Misleading Racism Analogy Triangulating Public Meaning: Corpus Linguistics, Immersion, and the Constitutional Record Working Without a Net: Supreme Court Decision Making as Performance Why Religious Freedom? Why the Religiously Committed, the Religiously Indifferent and Those Hostile to Religion Should Care A Lawyer's Introduction to Meaning in the Framework of Corpus Linguistics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1