The Productivity of Drug Development: A Systematic Review

Takeshi Akiyama, S. Sengoku
{"title":"The Productivity of Drug Development: A Systematic Review","authors":"Takeshi Akiyama, S. Sengoku","doi":"10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of the productivity of research and development (R&D) is crucial for the management of pharmaceutical businesses, and various methods, indicators, and proposals for R&D improvement have been investigated; however, there is no consensus on a unified criteria. To resolve this issue, we present a comprehensive review of previous studies on the topic. Publication databases were searched for all relevant studies related to the following: the pharmaceutical industry, R&D, and productivity; a total of 6,357 publications were obtained. Through in-depth screening, 190 publications were selected and subsequently reviewed. As a result, methods for the evaluation of pharmaceutical R&D were classified into four major approaches: R&D cost, regression analysis, ratio analysis and data envelope analysis (DEA). The characteristics of each of these approaches were examined from the following three perspectives: the pharmaceutical industry-level, company-level, and project-level. Furthermore, several elements were identified that explain the significant decrease in pharmaceutical R&D productivity: the sustainability of a business model; increase in R&D expenditure; effectiveness of outsourcing; size of the company; and premiums and amortization with mergers and acquisition (M&A). By forming an intellectual basis for the evaluation procedures, the present study has contributed to the theory of R&D management and to the practices used in the pharmaceutical industry.","PeriodicalId":390110,"journal":{"name":"2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The evaluation of the productivity of research and development (R&D) is crucial for the management of pharmaceutical businesses, and various methods, indicators, and proposals for R&D improvement have been investigated; however, there is no consensus on a unified criteria. To resolve this issue, we present a comprehensive review of previous studies on the topic. Publication databases were searched for all relevant studies related to the following: the pharmaceutical industry, R&D, and productivity; a total of 6,357 publications were obtained. Through in-depth screening, 190 publications were selected and subsequently reviewed. As a result, methods for the evaluation of pharmaceutical R&D were classified into four major approaches: R&D cost, regression analysis, ratio analysis and data envelope analysis (DEA). The characteristics of each of these approaches were examined from the following three perspectives: the pharmaceutical industry-level, company-level, and project-level. Furthermore, several elements were identified that explain the significant decrease in pharmaceutical R&D productivity: the sustainability of a business model; increase in R&D expenditure; effectiveness of outsourcing; size of the company; and premiums and amortization with mergers and acquisition (M&A). By forming an intellectual basis for the evaluation procedures, the present study has contributed to the theory of R&D management and to the practices used in the pharmaceutical industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物开发的生产力:一个系统的回顾
研究与开发(R&D)生产力的评价对医药企业的管理至关重要,研究了各种改进研发的方法、指标和建议;然而,在统一的标准上没有达成共识。为了解决这一问题,我们对以往的研究进行了全面的回顾。在出版物数据库中检索与以下内容相关的所有相关研究:制药业、研发和生产力;共获得6 357份出版物。通过深入筛选,选出190份出版物并随后加以审查。因此,将药品研发成本评价方法分为研发成本、回归分析、比率分析和数据包络分析(DEA)四大类。从以下三个角度考察了每种方法的特点:制药行业层面、公司层面和项目层面。此外,我们还发现了几个解释制药研发生产率显著下降的因素:商业模式的可持续性;增加研发支出;外包的有效性;公司规模;以及溢价和摊销与并购(M&A)。通过形成评价程序的知识基础,本研究为研发管理理论和制药行业的实践做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Patent Analysis to Anticipate Technology Trends: A Case of Coffee Processing Technology in Thailand The Effects of Business Environments on Innovation Activity and Firm Performance: Based on Workplace Panel Survey of South Korea Measurement and Comparison of Patent Quality on Typical Emerging Industries in China Patient Empowerment via Mobile Personal Health Records and Mobile Health Applications: A Review of the Current Use An Intelligent Risk Management Model for Achieving Smart Manufacturing on Internet of Things
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1