Instruments for unifying judicial practice in the European Union

Manuela Maria NECHITA (cas. PUȘCĂ)
{"title":"Instruments for unifying judicial practice in the European Union","authors":"Manuela Maria NECHITA (cas. PUȘCĂ)","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2023-1-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concern to ensure uniform judicial practice is a priority for most EU Member States and is reflected in the regulation in national law of numerous and varied mechanisms for unifying case law, some formal or informal, others involving an administrative or contentious procedure. The present research proposes to identify the mechanisms of unification of judicial practice existing at the level of the European Union States and an analysis of them in relation to the institution of the appeal in the interest of the law regulated by the criminal procedural legislation of our country. At the same time, we consider the following methodological means: literature review, comparative and epistemological method.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2023-1-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concern to ensure uniform judicial practice is a priority for most EU Member States and is reflected in the regulation in national law of numerous and varied mechanisms for unifying case law, some formal or informal, others involving an administrative or contentious procedure. The present research proposes to identify the mechanisms of unification of judicial practice existing at the level of the European Union States and an analysis of them in relation to the institution of the appeal in the interest of the law regulated by the criminal procedural legislation of our country. At the same time, we consider the following methodological means: literature review, comparative and epistemological method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
统一欧盟司法实践的文书
确保统一司法实践的关切是大多数欧盟成员国的优先事项,这反映在国内法中关于统一判例法的许多不同机制的规定中,有些是正式的或非正式的,有些则涉及行政程序或争议程序。本研究旨在识别欧盟层面存在的司法实践统一机制,并结合我国刑事诉讼立法所规范的法律利益申诉制度对其进行分析。同时,我们考虑了以下方法论手段:文献法、比较法和认识论法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on constitutionalism and the state of emergency Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic from the Brazilian Supreme Court and Romanian Constitutional Court Establishing an International Court against Terorism Questions prejudicielles a la Cour de Justice de l'Union Europeene: l'experience de la Cour Constitutionelle de Belgique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1