{"title":"ON THE REPRESENTATION OF THE CULTURAL CATEGORY OF SINFULNESS IN THE WORKS OF A. DE CUSTINE AND T. GAUTIER","authors":"E. Semukhina","doi":"10.12731/2576-9782-2022-4-158-171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cultural category of sinfulness is widely represented in the literature of the 19th century, in particular in the books of A. de Custine “Russia in 1839” and T. Gauthier “Journey to Russia”. The culturological study A. de Custine’s and T. Gautier’s works seems relevant, since the first underlies the background ideas of Europeans about the culture of Russia and it is the basis of permanent myths, and the second belongs to the pen of a famous French writer and arouses the interest of numerous modern scientists. In addition, the works written in the same era represent the presentation of the opposing views of the authors, which provides valuable material for analysis. It is also important to identify and study morphological units of cultural knowledge on a specific material, ensuring its preservation and translation. The aim of the work is to analyze the facts of objectification of the cultural category of sinfulness in the works of A. de Custine “Russia in 1839” and T. Gautier “Journey to Russia” (published in 1867). The main methods of research were the method of continuous sampling from the text of books of fragments and sayings correlated with the idea of sin and the cultural category of sinfulness itself, the method of observing the facts of objectification of cultural categories, the structural and functional method of unit analysis. The results of the work were the analysis of the selected units correlating with the concepts (understood as structural parts of the category) of sin and holiness. In the book of A. de Custine, in describing Russian culture, the concepts of such sins as pride, envy, sloth are objectified. In T. Gautier’s work is represented the concept of holiness in connection with the author’s image of “holy Russia”.","PeriodicalId":212111,"journal":{"name":"Russian Studies in Culture and Society","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Studies in Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12731/2576-9782-2022-4-158-171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The cultural category of sinfulness is widely represented in the literature of the 19th century, in particular in the books of A. de Custine “Russia in 1839” and T. Gauthier “Journey to Russia”. The culturological study A. de Custine’s and T. Gautier’s works seems relevant, since the first underlies the background ideas of Europeans about the culture of Russia and it is the basis of permanent myths, and the second belongs to the pen of a famous French writer and arouses the interest of numerous modern scientists. In addition, the works written in the same era represent the presentation of the opposing views of the authors, which provides valuable material for analysis. It is also important to identify and study morphological units of cultural knowledge on a specific material, ensuring its preservation and translation. The aim of the work is to analyze the facts of objectification of the cultural category of sinfulness in the works of A. de Custine “Russia in 1839” and T. Gautier “Journey to Russia” (published in 1867). The main methods of research were the method of continuous sampling from the text of books of fragments and sayings correlated with the idea of sin and the cultural category of sinfulness itself, the method of observing the facts of objectification of cultural categories, the structural and functional method of unit analysis. The results of the work were the analysis of the selected units correlating with the concepts (understood as structural parts of the category) of sin and holiness. In the book of A. de Custine, in describing Russian culture, the concepts of such sins as pride, envy, sloth are objectified. In T. Gautier’s work is represented the concept of holiness in connection with the author’s image of “holy Russia”.
罪恶的文化范畴在19世纪的文学作品中得到了广泛的体现,特别是在A. de Custine的《1839年的俄罗斯》和T. Gauthier的《俄罗斯之旅》中。a . de Custine和T. Gautier的作品的文化研究似乎是相关的,因为前者是欧洲人对俄罗斯文化的背景观念的基础,是永久神话的基础,而后者属于一位著名的法国作家的笔,引起了许多现代科学家的兴趣。此外,同一时代的作品代表了作者对立观点的呈现,为分析提供了宝贵的材料。识别和研究特定材料上文化知识的形态单位,确保其保存和翻译也很重要。本文的目的是分析A. de Custine的《1839年的俄罗斯》和T. Gautier的《俄罗斯之旅》(1867年出版)作品中罪恶文化范畴的客观化事实。主要的研究方法有:从与罪的观念和罪本身的文化范畴相关的断句书文本中连续取样的方法、观察文化范畴客观化事实的方法、结构与功能的单元分析方法。工作的结果是分析与罪恶和圣洁的概念(被理解为类别的结构部分)相关的选定单位。在A. de Custine的书中,在描述俄罗斯文化时,傲慢、嫉妒、懒惰等罪恶的概念被物化了。在T.戈蒂埃的作品中,神圣的概念与作者的“神圣俄罗斯”形象有关。