Validity of Carotid Doppler Ultrasound for Detection of Caroted Stenosis keeping Computed Tomography Sensitivity as Gold Standard

Shahzad Ahmad, Khatra Wahid, Gulsanga Ayub, Parkha Jabbar Khan, Muhammad Sajjad Ali Khan, Owais Ali
{"title":"Validity of Carotid Doppler Ultrasound for Detection of Caroted Stenosis keeping Computed Tomography Sensitivity as Gold Standard","authors":"Shahzad Ahmad, Khatra Wahid, Gulsanga Ayub, Parkha Jabbar Khan, Muhammad Sajjad Ali Khan, Owais Ali","doi":"10.52206/jsmc.2022.12.2.571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Stroke is that the world's leading reason for death and major incapacity. Arterial sclerosis is answerable for over half of all ischemic strokes. Plaque morphology has recently been discovered to assist within the prediction of arterial sclerosis, Clinical behaviour and stroke risk.Objective: To guage the frequency and diagnostic exactitude of artery Doppler imaging pathology detection to arterial blood vessel pathology.Material and Methods: Study was conducted in Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar from1st August 2019 to 31st March 2020. A total of 120 patients were consecutively selected. The inclusion criteria were all the patients having ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Doppler ultrasound was performed in every patient by a consultant radiologist. Doppler ultrasound findings were compared with Carotid artery stenosis reports.Results: Age range in this study was from 30-80 years with mean age of 63.07±3.76 years. Mean duration of disease was 1 Years ±3.32 months. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of Doppler Ultrasoundis 89.5%, 76.20%, 45.5%, 93.88% and 76.9% respectively.Conclusion: With the advancement in technology, the accuracy of Carotid artery stenosis diagnosis has significantly improved over the decades. From measuring the narrowing carotid artery diameter to evaluating the increased velocity field near the obstruction/lesion site, the identification of additional parameters to characterize plaque vulnerability has become more important in the carotid artery. Via various imaging modalities, the use of computer-aided programmes has increased the sensitivity, precision, and accuracy of Carotid artery stenosis diagnosis.Key Words: Carotid artery stenosis, Doppler ultrasound Sensitivity, Specificity","PeriodicalId":326561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2022.12.2.571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke is that the world's leading reason for death and major incapacity. Arterial sclerosis is answerable for over half of all ischemic strokes. Plaque morphology has recently been discovered to assist within the prediction of arterial sclerosis, Clinical behaviour and stroke risk.Objective: To guage the frequency and diagnostic exactitude of artery Doppler imaging pathology detection to arterial blood vessel pathology.Material and Methods: Study was conducted in Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar from1st August 2019 to 31st March 2020. A total of 120 patients were consecutively selected. The inclusion criteria were all the patients having ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Doppler ultrasound was performed in every patient by a consultant radiologist. Doppler ultrasound findings were compared with Carotid artery stenosis reports.Results: Age range in this study was from 30-80 years with mean age of 63.07±3.76 years. Mean duration of disease was 1 Years ±3.32 months. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of Doppler Ultrasoundis 89.5%, 76.20%, 45.5%, 93.88% and 76.9% respectively.Conclusion: With the advancement in technology, the accuracy of Carotid artery stenosis diagnosis has significantly improved over the decades. From measuring the narrowing carotid artery diameter to evaluating the increased velocity field near the obstruction/lesion site, the identification of additional parameters to characterize plaque vulnerability has become more important in the carotid artery. Via various imaging modalities, the use of computer-aided programmes has increased the sensitivity, precision, and accuracy of Carotid artery stenosis diagnosis.Key Words: Carotid artery stenosis, Doppler ultrasound Sensitivity, Specificity
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈动脉多普勒超声检测颈动脉狭窄的有效性,以计算机断层扫描灵敏度为金标准
背景:中风是世界上导致死亡和主要丧失工作能力的主要原因。动脉硬化是半数以上缺血性中风的病因。斑块形态最近被发现有助于预测动脉硬化、临床行为和中风风险。目的:探讨动脉多普勒成像病理检测对动脉血管病理的诊断准确率。材料和方法:研究于2019年8月1日至2020年3月31日在白沙瓦联合军队医院进行。共选取120例患者。纳入标准为所有缺血性脑血管病患者。每位患者均由放射科顾问医师进行多普勒超声检查。将多普勒超声检查结果与颈动脉狭窄报告进行比较。结果:年龄30 ~ 80岁,平均年龄63.07±3.76岁。平均病程1年±3.32个月。多普勒超声的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确率分别为89.5%、76.20%、45.5%、93.88%和76.9%。结论:近几十年来,随着技术的进步,颈动脉狭窄诊断的准确性有了显著提高。从测量狭窄的颈动脉直径到评估阻塞/病变部位附近增加的速度场,确定其他参数来表征斑块易感性在颈动脉中变得越来越重要。通过各种成像方式,计算机辅助程序的使用提高了颈动脉狭窄诊断的敏感性、精确性和准确性。关键词:颈动脉狭窄;多普勒超声;敏感性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality Control in Regional Blood Center QC Laboratory Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario Comparison of Color Matching Ability of Dental Students and Dental Graduates using Vita Tooth Guide 3-D Master Serum Zinc and Copper Levels in Children with Thalassemia Major The Efficacy of Phacotrabeculectomy in Reducing Intraocular Pressure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1