P50 Use of accelerometers to compare physical activity levels in participants with asthma grouped by body mass index and asthma severity

H. Ricketts, R. Chaudhuri, F. Steffensen, J. Baker, D. Buchan, D. Cowan
{"title":"P50 Use of accelerometers to compare physical activity levels in participants with asthma grouped by body mass index and asthma severity","authors":"H. Ricketts, R. Chaudhuri, F. Steffensen, J. Baker, D. Buchan, D. Cowan","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with asthma may find it impacts their ability to be physically active. Physical activity (PA) has been demonstrated to be lower in asthmatics compared to healthy controls. Obesity is commonly linked with difficult-to-control asthma and can worsen outcomes. At least 150 minutes of moderate physical activity (PA) per week is recommended for all adults by the World Health Organisation. We aimed to compare PA levels in patients with difficult-to-control asthma and body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m 2 (DOW group) and two control groups with mild-moderate asthma, one with BMI <25 kg/ m 2 (MHW group) and one with BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 (MOW group). Methods: This cross-sectional study used 7-day recordings from wrist-worn accelerometers to compare PA between groups. We recorded inactive time, light (LPA) and moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). We also measured novel metrics: intensity gradient (IG) reflecting PA intensity, and average acceleration (AA) reflecting PA volume. Parameters were compared across groups using ANOVA testing for normally distributed data and Kruskall-Wallis for skewed data. Correlation analysis explored associations between PA parameters and asthma measures. As AA was most closely correlated with asthma measures, we compared the highest and lowest AA quartiles using unpaired t and Mann-Whitney U tests, depending on normality. Results: 75 participants were recruited, 25 per group. Inactive time was significantly higher (p<0.001), and LPA (p=0.007), MVPA (p<0.001), IG (p=0.0001) and AA (p<0.0001) all significantly lower in DOW group compared to MHW and MOW groups, even after adjusting for age and BMI. For AA, notable correlations included beclometasone diproprionate-equivalent dose of inhaled corticosteroid (r=-0.591, p<0.0001),","PeriodicalId":243447,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics and monitoring of asthma and co-morbidities","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics and monitoring of asthma and co-morbidities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with asthma may find it impacts their ability to be physically active. Physical activity (PA) has been demonstrated to be lower in asthmatics compared to healthy controls. Obesity is commonly linked with difficult-to-control asthma and can worsen outcomes. At least 150 minutes of moderate physical activity (PA) per week is recommended for all adults by the World Health Organisation. We aimed to compare PA levels in patients with difficult-to-control asthma and body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m 2 (DOW group) and two control groups with mild-moderate asthma, one with BMI <25 kg/ m 2 (MHW group) and one with BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 (MOW group). Methods: This cross-sectional study used 7-day recordings from wrist-worn accelerometers to compare PA between groups. We recorded inactive time, light (LPA) and moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). We also measured novel metrics: intensity gradient (IG) reflecting PA intensity, and average acceleration (AA) reflecting PA volume. Parameters were compared across groups using ANOVA testing for normally distributed data and Kruskall-Wallis for skewed data. Correlation analysis explored associations between PA parameters and asthma measures. As AA was most closely correlated with asthma measures, we compared the highest and lowest AA quartiles using unpaired t and Mann-Whitney U tests, depending on normality. Results: 75 participants were recruited, 25 per group. Inactive time was significantly higher (p<0.001), and LPA (p=0.007), MVPA (p<0.001), IG (p=0.0001) and AA (p<0.0001) all significantly lower in DOW group compared to MHW and MOW groups, even after adjusting for age and BMI. For AA, notable correlations included beclometasone diproprionate-equivalent dose of inhaled corticosteroid (r=-0.591, p<0.0001),
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P50使用加速度计比较按体重指数和哮喘严重程度分组的哮喘患者的身体活动水平
背景:哮喘患者可能会发现它影响他们的身体活动能力。与健康对照组相比,哮喘患者的身体活动(PA)已被证明较低。肥胖通常与难以控制的哮喘有关,并可能使病情恶化。世界卫生组织建议所有成年人每周至少进行150分钟的适度体育活动。我们的目的是比较体重指数(BMI)≥25 kg/ m2的难治性哮喘患者(DOW组)和两个轻中度哮喘对照组(BMI <25 kg/ m2组)和BMI≥25 kg/ m2组(MOW组)的PA水平。方法:本横断面研究使用腕带加速度计7天的记录来比较两组之间的PA。我们记录了不活动时间、轻度运动(LPA)和中度剧烈运动(MVPA)。我们还测量了新的指标:反映PA强度的强度梯度(IG)和反映PA体积的平均加速度(AA)。正态分布数据采用ANOVA检验,偏态数据采用Kruskall-Wallis检验。相关性分析探讨了PA参数与哮喘指标之间的关系。由于AA与哮喘测量最密切相关,我们根据正态性使用未配对t和Mann-Whitney U检验比较了AA最高和最低四分位数。结果:招募了75名参与者,每组25人。即使在调整年龄和BMI后,DOW组的不活动时间显著高于MHW和MOW组(p<0.001), LPA (p=0.007)、MVPA (p<0.001)、IG (p=0.0001)和AA (p<0.0001)均显著低于MHW和MOW组。对于AA,显著相关性包括双丙酸倍氯米松-吸入皮质类固醇当量剂量(r=-0.591, p<0.0001);
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
P54 Combined exposure to vapors, gases, dusts, fumes and tobacco smoke increases the risk of asthma symptoms P46 Does asthma during pregnancy actually follow the ‘one-third’ rule? P50 Use of accelerometers to compare physical activity levels in participants with asthma grouped by body mass index and asthma severity P49 Bone protection for patients with asthma – a service evaluation P42 Asthma treatment adherence checks: present and future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1