Vocabulary Change in Process Writing: Effect of Text Structure Instruction

Sachi Oshima
{"title":"Vocabulary Change in Process Writing: Effect of Text Structure Instruction","authors":"Sachi Oshima","doi":"10.2478/eip-2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study, conducted as a follow-up study of Oshima (2020), was to examine whether Japanese EFL students’ use of vocabulary changed after being given lessons on explicit instruction on text structure and process writing. Two groups of college students—the beginner-level group writing a descriptive essay and the advanced-level group writing an argumentative essay—wrote an outline, the first draft (D1), the second draft (D2), and the final draft (FD), and I examined the differences in lexical richness between students’ D1 and FD with New Word Level Checker (Mizumoto, 2021). The results showed that both groups’ drafts had changed in the number of words used (tokens), the number of unique words used (types), and the number of lower frequency words used. This study’s finding also supports the importance of choosing an appropriate measurement to analyze students’ vocabulary levels. For Japanese students, 1K-word bands, which have been widely used in previous literature, seem too broad to capture their small vocabulary improvement.","PeriodicalId":131106,"journal":{"name":"Englishes in Practice","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Englishes in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/eip-2023-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study, conducted as a follow-up study of Oshima (2020), was to examine whether Japanese EFL students’ use of vocabulary changed after being given lessons on explicit instruction on text structure and process writing. Two groups of college students—the beginner-level group writing a descriptive essay and the advanced-level group writing an argumentative essay—wrote an outline, the first draft (D1), the second draft (D2), and the final draft (FD), and I examined the differences in lexical richness between students’ D1 and FD with New Word Level Checker (Mizumoto, 2021). The results showed that both groups’ drafts had changed in the number of words used (tokens), the number of unique words used (types), and the number of lower frequency words used. This study’s finding also supports the importance of choosing an appropriate measurement to analyze students’ vocabulary levels. For Japanese students, 1K-word bands, which have been widely used in previous literature, seem too broad to capture their small vocabulary improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过程写作中的词汇变化:篇章结构指导的影响
作为Oshima(2020)的后续研究,本研究的目的是考察日本英语学生在接受了文本结构和过程写作的显性教学后,词汇的使用是否发生了变化。两组大学生——写一篇描述性文章的初级组和写一篇议论文的高级组——写了一个大纲,初稿(D1),二稿(D2)和终稿(FD),我用新词水平检查器(Mizumoto, 2021)检查了学生的D1和FD之间词汇丰富程度的差异。结果表明,两组的草稿在使用的单词数量(标记)、使用的独特单词数量(类型)和使用的低频单词数量上都发生了变化。本研究的发现也支持了选择合适的测量方法来分析学生词汇水平的重要性。对于日本学生来说,以前文献中广泛使用的1000个单词波段似乎太宽泛了,无法反映他们词汇量的小幅提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vocabulary Change in Process Writing: Effect of Text Structure Instruction The use of technology in teaching ELF pronunciation: a help or a hinderance? Changing perceptions of English among Japanese teachers in Brussels Navigating Boundaries through Knowledge: Intercultural Phenomena in ELF Interactions Short-Term Study Abroad: Developing Global Englishes Awareness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1