Researchers' awareness about plagiarism and impact of plagiarism detection tools - does awareness effect the actions towards preventing plagiarism?

S. M. Mostofa, M. Tabassum, S. M. Zabed Ahmed
{"title":"Researchers' awareness about plagiarism and impact of plagiarism detection tools - does awareness effect the actions towards preventing plagiarism?","authors":"S. M. Mostofa, M. Tabassum, S. M. Zabed Ahmed","doi":"10.1108/DLP-10-2020-0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to analyse researchers’ awareness about plagiarism and impact of plagiarism detection tools on the actions that they take to prevent plagiarism. It also employs a structural model that examines whether awareness of plagiarism and anti-plagiarism tools have any significant effect on the actions taken by the researchers to avoid plagiarism.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA survey questionnaire was distributed to researchers at a large public university in Bangladesh. The survey accumulated 184 valid responses. Descriptive statistics were obtained to assess researchers’ awareness about plagiarism and impact of plagiarism detection tools and the actions taken by them. The reasons that may cause plagiarism were also identified. The awareness of the availability of the anti-plagiarism software that was being used by the university and its actual use by the researchers was gathered through the survey. Non-parametric Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were conducted to investigate the differences in awareness levels and actions in terms of gender, age, discipline and current level of research. The chi-square test was carried out to examine the relationship between awareness about the availability of the anti-plagiarism software and its use by the researchers. Finally, the survey data were analysed using structural equation modeling to examine the effects of awareness of plagiarism and anti-plagiarism software on the actions taken by the researchers.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study revealed that the level of awareness regarding plagiarism and impact of plagiarism detection software is generally high among the researchers. There are some significant differences between researchers’ demographic and personal characteristics and their awareness levels and actions with regard to plagiarism. The findings indicate that almost three-quarters of the researchers were aware about the anti-plagiarism tool that is being used, whereas more than half of the researchers indicated that they used the software to assess their works. The results of the structural equation model do not show a good fit, although there is strong statistical evidence that awareness about plagiarism and anti-plagiarism software has significantly impacted researchers’ actions towards preventing plagiarism.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThere is no reported study on researchers’ awareness of plagiarism and its affiliated issues in Bangladesh. The findings of this study will not only provide useful insights regarding awareness about plagiarism but also assist university authorities to formulate relevant policy and take necessary actions against plagiarism in higher education institutions.\n","PeriodicalId":438470,"journal":{"name":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-10-2020-0100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to analyse researchers’ awareness about plagiarism and impact of plagiarism detection tools on the actions that they take to prevent plagiarism. It also employs a structural model that examines whether awareness of plagiarism and anti-plagiarism tools have any significant effect on the actions taken by the researchers to avoid plagiarism. Design/methodology/approach A survey questionnaire was distributed to researchers at a large public university in Bangladesh. The survey accumulated 184 valid responses. Descriptive statistics were obtained to assess researchers’ awareness about plagiarism and impact of plagiarism detection tools and the actions taken by them. The reasons that may cause plagiarism were also identified. The awareness of the availability of the anti-plagiarism software that was being used by the university and its actual use by the researchers was gathered through the survey. Non-parametric Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were conducted to investigate the differences in awareness levels and actions in terms of gender, age, discipline and current level of research. The chi-square test was carried out to examine the relationship between awareness about the availability of the anti-plagiarism software and its use by the researchers. Finally, the survey data were analysed using structural equation modeling to examine the effects of awareness of plagiarism and anti-plagiarism software on the actions taken by the researchers. Findings The study revealed that the level of awareness regarding plagiarism and impact of plagiarism detection software is generally high among the researchers. There are some significant differences between researchers’ demographic and personal characteristics and their awareness levels and actions with regard to plagiarism. The findings indicate that almost three-quarters of the researchers were aware about the anti-plagiarism tool that is being used, whereas more than half of the researchers indicated that they used the software to assess their works. The results of the structural equation model do not show a good fit, although there is strong statistical evidence that awareness about plagiarism and anti-plagiarism software has significantly impacted researchers’ actions towards preventing plagiarism. Originality/value There is no reported study on researchers’ awareness of plagiarism and its affiliated issues in Bangladesh. The findings of this study will not only provide useful insights regarding awareness about plagiarism but also assist university authorities to formulate relevant policy and take necessary actions against plagiarism in higher education institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究人员对抄袭的意识和抄袭检测工具的影响——意识是否影响了防止抄袭的行动?
本文旨在分析研究人员对抄袭的意识,以及抄袭检测工具对他们采取的防止抄袭行动的影响。它还采用了一个结构模型来检验抄袭意识和反抄袭工具是否对研究人员采取的避免抄袭的行动有任何重大影响。设计/方法/方法向孟加拉国一所大型公立大学的研究人员分发了一份调查问卷。调查共收集了184份有效回复。通过描述性统计来评估研究者对剽窃的认知程度、剽窃检测工具的影响以及他们采取的行动。还确定了可能导致抄袭的原因。通过调查收集了大学正在使用的反剽窃软件的可用性以及研究人员对其实际使用情况的认识。采用非参数Mann-Whitney和Kruskal-Wallis检验来调查性别、年龄、学科和当前研究水平在认知水平和行动方面的差异。采用卡方检验检验研究人员对反剽窃软件可用性的认知与使用之间的关系。最后,利用结构方程模型对调查数据进行分析,考察了抄袭意识和反抄袭软件对研究者采取的行动的影响。研究结果表明,研究人员对抄袭的意识和抄袭检测软件的影响程度普遍较高。研究人员的人口学特征和个人特征与他们对抄袭的认知水平和行为存在显著差异。调查结果表明,近四分之三的研究人员知道正在使用的反剽窃工具,而超过一半的研究人员表示他们使用该软件来评估他们的作品。结构方程模型的结果并没有显示出很好的拟合,尽管有强有力的统计证据表明,抄袭意识和反抄袭软件显著影响了研究人员防止抄袭的行动。原创性/价值在孟加拉国,没有关于研究人员对剽窃及其相关问题的认识的报道。本研究的结果不但有助提高学生对抄袭的认识,亦有助大学当局制定相关政策,并采取必要的行动,打击高校的抄袭行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A partnership between the library and the digital humanities scholars: interview with Plamen Miltenoff Identifying research fronts in NLP applications in library and information science using meta-analysis approaches Open access initiatives in European countries: analysis of trends and policies Cyber security in university libraries and implication for library and information science education in Nigeria The Cologne Public Library as accelerator of digitisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1