Grammaticalization in progress

Kiri Lee, Y. Cho
{"title":"Grammaticalization in progress","authors":"Kiri Lee, Y. Cho","doi":"10.1075/alal.22001.lee","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Korean and Japanese are typical classifier languages that classify a noun based on the semantic type of its\n referent with a counter word when plurality is involved. Their plural marking appears to be optional when the noun denotes general\n plurality, but obligatory when a noun is marked by the semantic feature, [+specific] (Ioni, Ko\n & Wexler, 2004). In this study, we characterize the so-called ‘optional’ plurality in Korean and Japanese as the\n manifestation of the grammaticalization. Drawing on actual data, we demonstrate that the plural suffix is increasingly used as a\n neutral plural marker. The grammaticalization is more prevalent when the nouns are higher in the Animacy Hierarchy (e.g., Comrie, 1989), although there are differences in acceptability between Korean and\n Japanese. We attribute the differences to the language-specific uses of the plural suffix, namely, Japanese associative reading\n and Korean event-plural reading (Song, 1997).","PeriodicalId":322360,"journal":{"name":"Asian Languages and Linguistics","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Languages and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.22001.lee","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Korean and Japanese are typical classifier languages that classify a noun based on the semantic type of its referent with a counter word when plurality is involved. Their plural marking appears to be optional when the noun denotes general plurality, but obligatory when a noun is marked by the semantic feature, [+specific] (Ioni, Ko & Wexler, 2004). In this study, we characterize the so-called ‘optional’ plurality in Korean and Japanese as the manifestation of the grammaticalization. Drawing on actual data, we demonstrate that the plural suffix is increasingly used as a neutral plural marker. The grammaticalization is more prevalent when the nouns are higher in the Animacy Hierarchy (e.g., Comrie, 1989), although there are differences in acceptability between Korean and Japanese. We attribute the differences to the language-specific uses of the plural suffix, namely, Japanese associative reading and Korean event-plural reading (Song, 1997).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正在进行的语法化
韩语和日语是典型的分类语言,在涉及复数的情况下,根据指代物的语义类型和对应词对名词进行分类。当名词表示一般复数时,他们的复数标记似乎是可选的,但当一个名词被语义特征标记时,[+specific]是强制性的(Ioni, Ko & Wexler, 2004)。在本研究中,我们将韩语和日语中所谓的“可选择的”多元性描述为语法化的表现。根据实际数据,我们证明了复数后缀越来越多地被用作中性复数标记。尽管韩语和日语在可接受性上存在差异,但当名词在Animacy Hierarchy中处于较高位置时,语法化更为普遍(例如,Comrie, 1989)。我们将这种差异归因于对复数后缀的特定语言使用,即日语的联想阅读和韩语的事件复数阅读(Song, 1997)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern Uyghur evidentials in interrogative sentences The semantic constraint on gapping in Mandarin Chinese The syntax of reconstruction in English and Chinese Grammaticalization in progress What makes the blocking effect happen?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1