Conceptual Structures of QurʔĀnic SaʔAla ‘Ask’: An Analysis from Cognitive Linguistics

Hebm Gaballa
{"title":"Conceptual Structures of QurʔĀnic SaʔAla ‘Ask’: An Analysis from Cognitive Linguistics","authors":"Hebm Gaballa","doi":"10.4314/%U.V23I1.%C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project attempts to provide one cognitive, that is, schematic, network of all occurrences of the Qurʔānic saʔala \"ask.\" The theoretical framework to argue for the proposed network is dual: to argue for a number of pragmatic functions that seem to underlie the choice of saʔala; and to make a strong case that these pragmatic functions motivate cognitive interpretation. The paper, which initially examines distinct interpretations of Qurʔānic saʔala that ensue from a contextual analysis of its occurrences, reveals these pragmatic functions: ṭalab \"request,\" ʔistifsār \"enquiry,\" muħāsaba \"interrogation,\" ʔistifzāz \"aggravation,\" ʔiṭmiʔnān \"concern about well-being,\" tawbīx \"reproach,\" tabkīt \"rebuke,\" taqrīr \"attestation\" and duʕāʔ \"prayer.\" Based on this pragmatic and other related syntactic evidence, it argues that \"ask\" cognitively frames, not two, but three central types of cognitively-based construal: information-seeking \"ask,\" performative \"ask\" and interrogating \"ask.\" The paper proposes some conceptual structures trigger some various utilizations of Qurʔānic \"ask;\" and argues that they all interlink into one schematic network that enables readers, translators and interpreters of the Holy Qurʔān to account, in a natural manner, for the verb's execution of these pragmatic functions. Finally, the findings and their theoretical implications are outlined. Keywords : Arabic linguistics, cognitive semantics, linguistic pragmatics & Qurʔānic interpretation & translation","PeriodicalId":411071,"journal":{"name":"Marang: Journal of Language and Literature","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marang: Journal of Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/%U.V23I1.%C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This project attempts to provide one cognitive, that is, schematic, network of all occurrences of the Qurʔānic saʔala "ask." The theoretical framework to argue for the proposed network is dual: to argue for a number of pragmatic functions that seem to underlie the choice of saʔala; and to make a strong case that these pragmatic functions motivate cognitive interpretation. The paper, which initially examines distinct interpretations of Qurʔānic saʔala that ensue from a contextual analysis of its occurrences, reveals these pragmatic functions: ṭalab "request," ʔistifsār "enquiry," muħāsaba "interrogation," ʔistifzāz "aggravation," ʔiṭmiʔnān "concern about well-being," tawbīx "reproach," tabkīt "rebuke," taqrīr "attestation" and duʕāʔ "prayer." Based on this pragmatic and other related syntactic evidence, it argues that "ask" cognitively frames, not two, but three central types of cognitively-based construal: information-seeking "ask," performative "ask" and interrogating "ask." The paper proposes some conceptual structures trigger some various utilizations of Qurʔānic "ask;" and argues that they all interlink into one schematic network that enables readers, translators and interpreters of the Holy Qurʔān to account, in a natural manner, for the verb's execution of these pragmatic functions. Finally, the findings and their theoretical implications are outlined. Keywords : Arabic linguistics, cognitive semantics, linguistic pragmatics & Qurʔānic interpretation & translation
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从认知语言学角度分析“问”的概念结构Ānic
这个项目试图提供一个认知,也就是,古兰经的所有出现的示意图,网络ānic sa阿拉“问”。支持这一网络的理论框架是双重的:一是支持一些语用功能,这些功能似乎是选择sa / ala的基础;并证明这些语用功能激发了认知解释。本文首先考察了对古兰经的不同解释,这些解释源于对其出现的语境分析,揭示了这些语用功能:ṭalab“请求”,“istifsār”询问,“muħāsaba”审讯,“istifzāz”愤怒,“iṭmi“nān”关心福祉,“tawb x”责备,“tabk t”责备,“taqr r”证明”和“du uh ā eh”祈祷。基于这种语用学和其他相关的句法证据,它认为“问”的认知框架,不是两种,而是三种核心类型的基于认知的解释:信息寻求的“问”,行为的“问”和询问的“问”。本文提出了一些概念结构触发了古兰经的一些不同的用途ānic“问”,并认为它们都相互联系成一个示意图网络,使读者,翻译和解释神圣的古兰经ān的译者,以一种自然的方式来解释动词执行这些语用功能。最后,概述了研究结果及其理论意义。关键词:阿拉伯语语言学;认知语义学;语言语用学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The 'drug' of deconstructive ambivalence in Thomas Middleton's Jacobean revenge tragedies Displacement of indigenous languages in families: A case study of some selected Nigerian families in Botswana Jackal the judge: An ecocentric approach to environmental education through African narrative performance The Postcolonial African Novel as a Metanarrative of the Myth of the Nation-State: The Case of James Ng’ombe’s Novels Accessing African History Through Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1