Brief considerations regarding decision no. 26/2021 of the constitutional court regarding the constitutionality of the provisions of the art. 4881 paragraph 2 of Code of criminal procedure

Ioana Narcisa Anițulesei
{"title":"Brief considerations regarding decision no. 26/2021 of the constitutional court regarding the constitutionality of the provisions of the art. 4881 paragraph 2 of Code of criminal procedure","authors":"Ioana Narcisa Anițulesei","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, the author analyzes the provisions of art. 4881 of the Code of \nCriminal Procedure which, until now, have been the subject of multiple exceptions \nof unconstitutionality examined by the Constitutional Court. \n Mainly, the study focuses on the considerations set out in Decision no. 26/2021 \npronounced by Constitutional Court in which was statued the constitutionality of \nthe provisions of art. 4881 paragraph 2 and 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. \n In his approach, the author makes additional arguments in support of the \nunconstitutionality of the rule by reference to national and European provisions \nenshrining the principle of equality of citizens before the law.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, the author analyzes the provisions of art. 4881 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which, until now, have been the subject of multiple exceptions of unconstitutionality examined by the Constitutional Court. Mainly, the study focuses on the considerations set out in Decision no. 26/2021 pronounced by Constitutional Court in which was statued the constitutionality of the provisions of art. 4881 paragraph 2 and 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In his approach, the author makes additional arguments in support of the unconstitutionality of the rule by reference to national and European provisions enshrining the principle of equality of citizens before the law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于第1号决定的简要考虑。宪法法院第26/2021号关于本条规定是否合宪性的决议。4881刑事诉讼法第2款
在本研究中,作者分析了艺术的规定。《刑事诉讼法》第4881条的规定,到目前为止,这些规定一直是宪法法院审查的多个违宪例外的主题。这项研究主要集中于第11号决定所载的考虑。第26/2021号宪法法院宣布,其中规定了第2条规定的合宪性。4881《刑事诉讼法》第2和第3款。发件人在其方法中还提出了其他论据,以引用国家和欧洲规定的公民在法律面前平等的原则,来支持这一规定是违宪的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on constitutionalism and the state of emergency Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic from the Brazilian Supreme Court and Romanian Constitutional Court Establishing an International Court against Terorism Questions prejudicielles a la Cour de Justice de l'Union Europeene: l'experience de la Cour Constitutionelle de Belgique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1