Multidisciplinary working, evidence, treatment, and decision-making in medicine

A. Huda
{"title":"Multidisciplinary working, evidence, treatment, and decision-making in medicine","authors":"A. Huda","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198807254.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients have many needs and not all can be met using the medical model, hence the necessity of multiple therapeutic models and multidisciplinary working. Doctors’ sapiental role relies on evidence from research which can vary in quality. Quantitative and qualitative research are both useful. Randomized controlled trials with blinded assessments are the best method of assessing treatment effectiveness. Objectives of treatment should be jointly decided between doctor and patient and are often not simply about cure. Mechanisms of action of intervention do not always reverse disease progress but may involve other processes such as indirect compensation. Medication has many complex effects, both therapeutic and adverse. The medical model allows doctors to see many patients and work in emergency situations including providing overnight cover. This is because after the initial assessment, further assessments can be brief and if medication is used it is usually taken outside consultations. This ability to see many patients at all hours means mental health services will often include doctors using the medical model.","PeriodicalId":106646,"journal":{"name":"The Medical Model in Mental Health","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical Model in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198807254.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients have many needs and not all can be met using the medical model, hence the necessity of multiple therapeutic models and multidisciplinary working. Doctors’ sapiental role relies on evidence from research which can vary in quality. Quantitative and qualitative research are both useful. Randomized controlled trials with blinded assessments are the best method of assessing treatment effectiveness. Objectives of treatment should be jointly decided between doctor and patient and are often not simply about cure. Mechanisms of action of intervention do not always reverse disease progress but may involve other processes such as indirect compensation. Medication has many complex effects, both therapeutic and adverse. The medical model allows doctors to see many patients and work in emergency situations including providing overnight cover. This is because after the initial assessment, further assessments can be brief and if medication is used it is usually taken outside consultations. This ability to see many patients at all hours means mental health services will often include doctors using the medical model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学中的多学科工作、证据、治疗和决策
患者有许多需求,并不是所有的需求都可以通过医学模式得到满足,因此需要多种治疗模式和多学科合作。医生的智力作用依赖于来自研究的证据,这些证据的质量参差不齐。定量和定性研究都是有用的。随机对照试验与盲法评估是评估治疗效果的最佳方法。治疗的目标应该由医生和病人共同决定,而不仅仅是治愈。干预的作用机制并不总是逆转疾病进展,但可能涉及其他过程,如间接补偿。药物有许多复杂的作用,既有治疗作用,也有不良作用。这种医疗模式允许医生看很多病人,并在紧急情况下工作,包括提供过夜服务。这是因为在初步评估之后,进一步的评估可能是简短的,如果使用药物,通常是在外部咨询。这种能够在任何时间看到许多病人的能力意味着心理健康服务将经常包括使用医学模式的医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical utility of diagnosis The clinical picture, creating diagnostic constructs, and causation The role of diagnosis in medical practice and society Variability of clinical picture Multidisciplinary working, evidence, treatment, and decision-making in medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1