On Approaches to the Formation of a Regional System of Scientific and Technical Expertise

G. Shepelev, I. Ganieva, Gennady Martinyuk
{"title":"On Approaches to the Formation of a Regional System of Scientific and Technical Expertise","authors":"G. Shepelev, I. Ganieva, Gennady Martinyuk","doi":"10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The general approaches to expertise in the evaluation of scientific and technical projects at the regional level are considered. The regulatory framework for the organization of expertise at the federal, sectoral and regional levels is considered. The normative and methodological documents on the organization of expertise in large organizations that perform large amounts of work on the examination of scientific and technical projects, the experience of organizing expert activities in such organizations are considered. The experience of organizing expert activities in a number of regions has been reviewed. The approaches to the organization of expertise of scientific and technical projects at the regional level are formulated – the specifics of such expertise associated with a limited number of experts in the region, the breadth of the subject matter to be examined, and a relatively small total number of examinations, increasing the unit costs of organizing expert activities in the region, are considered. Approaches are proposed to ensure the high quality of expertise with limited resources for its organization: the appointment of one of the scientific organizations as the organizer of the examination, the creation and maintenance of a database of experts involved in the examination of regional projects, the development of methodological recommendations for the organization of expertise, taking into account regional specifics.","PeriodicalId":433804,"journal":{"name":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The general approaches to expertise in the evaluation of scientific and technical projects at the regional level are considered. The regulatory framework for the organization of expertise at the federal, sectoral and regional levels is considered. The normative and methodological documents on the organization of expertise in large organizations that perform large amounts of work on the examination of scientific and technical projects, the experience of organizing expert activities in such organizations are considered. The experience of organizing expert activities in a number of regions has been reviewed. The approaches to the organization of expertise of scientific and technical projects at the regional level are formulated – the specifics of such expertise associated with a limited number of experts in the region, the breadth of the subject matter to be examined, and a relatively small total number of examinations, increasing the unit costs of organizing expert activities in the region, are considered. Approaches are proposed to ensure the high quality of expertise with limited resources for its organization: the appointment of one of the scientific organizations as the organizer of the examination, the creation and maintenance of a database of experts involved in the examination of regional projects, the development of methodological recommendations for the organization of expertise, taking into account regional specifics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域科技专业知识体系形成途径研究
审议了在区域一级评价科学和技术项目时获得专门知识的一般办法。审议了在联邦、部门和区域各级组织专门知识的管理框架。审议了在从事大量科学和技术项目审查工作的大型组织中组织专门知识的规范性和方法学文件,以及在这些组织中组织专家活动的经验。审查了在若干区域组织专家活动的经验。拟定了在区域一级组织科学和技术项目专门知识的办法- -考虑到这种专门知识与区域内有限数量的专家有关的具体情况、待审查主题的广度和审查总数相对较少,从而增加了在区域内组织专家活动的单位费用。提出了在组织资源有限的情况下确保高质量的专门知识的办法:任命一个科学组织作为审查的组织者,建立和维持一个参与审查区域项目的专家数据库,在考虑到区域具体情况的情况下拟订组织专门知识的方法建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Separation of Scientific Activity and the State-owned Corporate Form of Science Management in Contemporary Russia. Part 1 Jurisprudence for the Development of Science: Ideas that Should Not Be Forgotten (To the 100th Anniversary of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the RF) The State Policy of the USSR in Relation to the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in the Second Half of the 20th Century. The Organizational and Legal Aspect Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Russian Economy: A Practitioner’s View Digitalization of Public Administration and Economy: Terminological Clarity as a Factor of Success of Digital Development. Review of the Textbook “Digital State and Economy” Edited by S. E. Prokofiev, O. V. Panina and K. V. Kharchenko
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1