The Proportional Fee, Transaction Fee and Membership Fee

Linfeng Chen
{"title":"The Proportional Fee, Transaction Fee and Membership Fee","authors":"Linfeng Chen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3320939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are in general three types of fees used by platforms: the fixed membership fee, transaction fee and proportional fee. In real-life, all three fees are used by different platforms. Often, the fee charged by the market maker is a combination of the fixed, transaction and proportional fees. We try to offer a rationale for the usage of these fee structures. Compared with the transaction fee, the profit for the platform is higher under the proportional fee. If the consumption value is high enough, then the profit under the membership fee is the lowest. If the value is low enough, then the profit under the membership fee is the highest. If the value is in the middle, then the profit under the membership fee is in the middle as well. However, when we allow free entry of merchants, results are different. The profit of the card network could be lower under the proportional fee than the transaction fee with free entry of merchants. Equilibrium under the proportional fee and the membership fee is the same. Consumer surplus is lower under the transaction fee than the proportional fee and the membership fee. But social welfare could be higher under the transaction fee. We also consider regulation of the fee structure and the optimal fee.","PeriodicalId":275253,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research eJournal","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3320939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are in general three types of fees used by platforms: the fixed membership fee, transaction fee and proportional fee. In real-life, all three fees are used by different platforms. Often, the fee charged by the market maker is a combination of the fixed, transaction and proportional fees. We try to offer a rationale for the usage of these fee structures. Compared with the transaction fee, the profit for the platform is higher under the proportional fee. If the consumption value is high enough, then the profit under the membership fee is the lowest. If the value is low enough, then the profit under the membership fee is the highest. If the value is in the middle, then the profit under the membership fee is in the middle as well. However, when we allow free entry of merchants, results are different. The profit of the card network could be lower under the proportional fee than the transaction fee with free entry of merchants. Equilibrium under the proportional fee and the membership fee is the same. Consumer surplus is lower under the transaction fee than the proportional fee and the membership fee. But social welfare could be higher under the transaction fee. We also consider regulation of the fee structure and the optimal fee.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比例费、交易费和会员费
平台使用的费用一般有三种:固定会员费、交易费和比例费。在现实生活中,这三种收费都被不同的平台使用。通常,做市商收取的费用是固定费用、交易费用和比例费用的组合。我们试图为这些收费结构的使用提供一个基本原理。与交易费相比,在比例收费下,平台的利润更高。如果消费价值足够高,那么会员费下的利润是最低的。如果价值足够低,那么会费下的利润是最高的。如果价值处于中间,那么会员费下的利润也处于中间。但是,当我们允许商家免费进入时,结果就不一样了。在按比例收费的情况下,信用卡网络的利润可能低于商家免费进入的交易费用。均衡下的比例费和会员费是一样的。交易费下的消费者剩余低于比例费和会员费。但在交易费下,社会福利可能会更高。我们还考虑了收费结构的调整和最优收费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Performance of Certainty-equivalent Pricing Optimal Policies for a Multi-Echelon Inventory Problem with Service Time Target and Expediting Robust Epidemiological Prediction and Optimization Strategic Alliances and Lending Relationships Role of Production Efficiency: Inventory Leanness and Financial Outcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1