Is sustainable certification's ability to combat greenwashing trustworthy?

A. Nygaard
{"title":"Is sustainable certification's ability to combat greenwashing trustworthy?","authors":"A. Nygaard","doi":"10.3389/frsus.2023.1188069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Certifications are widely recognized as important tools in addressing climate change, safeguarding human rights, and promoting environmentally sustainable practices. However, this critical review article draws attention to potential negative impacts associated with certifications. The purpose of this review is to highlight the risks and challenges associated with certifications despite their intended benefits. Methods The review draws on existing literature on certifications and their impacts, as well as empirical studies on the effectiveness of certifications in addressing climate change, safeguarding human rights, and promoting environmentally sustainable practices. Results The review finds that certifications can increase the perceived value of eco-friendly brands and consumer willingness to pay. However, the review also highlights the risks of greenwashing and free riding, which can undermine the intended benefits of certifications. Additionally, the institutional organization of certification systems may exhibit structural inertia, which may impede the integration of disruptive green technologies and market transitions. Discussion The potential negative impacts of certifications on addressing climate change, safeguarding human rights, and promoting environmentally sustainable practices should not be overlooked. It is essential to implement measures to mitigate the risks of eco-opportunism and to effectively combat greenwashing. The review suggests that certification systems should be designed to promote innovation and the adoption of new technologies, rather than being a barrier to change. Conclusion Certifications are important tools for addressing climate change, safeguarding human rights, and promoting environmentally sustainable practices. However, their potential negative impacts should be acknowledged and addressed. The review recommends implementing measures to mitigate the risks of eco-opportunism and to effectively combat greenwashing, while promoting innovation and the adoption of new technologies.","PeriodicalId":253319,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainability","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1188069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction Certifications are widely recognized as important tools in addressing climate change, safeguarding human rights, and promoting environmentally sustainable practices. However, this critical review article draws attention to potential negative impacts associated with certifications. The purpose of this review is to highlight the risks and challenges associated with certifications despite their intended benefits. Methods The review draws on existing literature on certifications and their impacts, as well as empirical studies on the effectiveness of certifications in addressing climate change, safeguarding human rights, and promoting environmentally sustainable practices. Results The review finds that certifications can increase the perceived value of eco-friendly brands and consumer willingness to pay. However, the review also highlights the risks of greenwashing and free riding, which can undermine the intended benefits of certifications. Additionally, the institutional organization of certification systems may exhibit structural inertia, which may impede the integration of disruptive green technologies and market transitions. Discussion The potential negative impacts of certifications on addressing climate change, safeguarding human rights, and promoting environmentally sustainable practices should not be overlooked. It is essential to implement measures to mitigate the risks of eco-opportunism and to effectively combat greenwashing. The review suggests that certification systems should be designed to promote innovation and the adoption of new technologies, rather than being a barrier to change. Conclusion Certifications are important tools for addressing climate change, safeguarding human rights, and promoting environmentally sustainable practices. However, their potential negative impacts should be acknowledged and addressed. The review recommends implementing measures to mitigate the risks of eco-opportunism and to effectively combat greenwashing, while promoting innovation and the adoption of new technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续认证对抗“漂绿”的能力值得信赖吗?
认证被广泛认为是应对气候变化、保障人权和促进环境可持续实践的重要工具。然而,这篇重要的评论文章提请注意与认证相关的潜在负面影响。本综述的目的是强调认证的风险和挑战,尽管它们有预期的好处。方法回顾现有的认证及其影响方面的文献,以及认证在应对气候变化、保障人权和促进环境可持续实践方面的有效性的实证研究。结果研究发现,认证可以提高环保品牌的感知价值和消费者的支付意愿。然而,该审查也强调了绿色清洗和搭便车的风险,这可能会破坏认证的预期好处。此外,认证系统的制度组织可能表现出结构性惯性,这可能阻碍破坏性绿色技术和市场转型的整合。认证在应对气候变化、保障人权和促进环境可持续实践方面的潜在负面影响不应被忽视。必须采取措施减轻生态机会主义的风险,并有效地打击“漂绿”。该审查建议,认证制度的设计应该促进创新和采用新技术,而不是成为变革的障碍。认证是应对气候变化、保障人权和促进环境可持续实践的重要工具。然而,它们潜在的负面影响应该得到承认和解决。该审查建议实施措施,以减轻生态机会主义的风险,并有效地打击“漂绿”,同时促进创新和采用新技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Campus sustainability at Rhodes University, South Africa: perceptions, awareness level, and potential interventions PET and polyolefin plastics supply chains in Michigan: present and future systems analysis of environmental and socio-economic impacts COP28 and the global stocktake: a weak attempt to address climate change Strengthening resilience: decentralized decision-making and multi-criteria analysis in the energy-water-food nexus systems Tomato disease detection with lightweight recurrent and convolutional deep learning models for sustainable and smart agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1